Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forum Home
Law Firms
Wiki
Events
Deadlines
Members
Leaderboards
Apply to Paul, Weiss
Premium Database
TCLA Premium:
Now half price (£30/month). Applications, interviews, commercial awareness + 700+ examples.
Join →
Forum Home
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
Applications Discussion
TCLA Vacation Scheme Applications Discussion Thread 2025-26
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Abbie Whitlock" data-source="post: 245199" data-attributes="member: 42112"><p>Hey!</p><p></p><p>Congratulations on receiving the assessment centre invite, that is fantastic news!!</p><p></p><p>Of course, happy to share my main thoughts after my experience with the Farrer & Co AC last cycle <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p><strong>Written Exercise</strong></p><p></p><p>The main thing I would make sure to do is to have an understanding of the types of structures and document types that could come up. I would look up things such as attendance notes, memos, client emails, letters, and reports, and make a note of what elements you need to include and structure it in that way. </p><p></p><p>I also made use of headings and subheadings, and a mix of bullet points and prose, and I think that it made it easier to read and follow. Additionally, make sure you are clear on what practice area Farrers has - in my task, the hypothetical scenario included advising on certain areas of law and it was important to know whether Farrers actually advised on them.</p><p></p><p>Other than that, I honestly think just give it your best shot and you'll do well! During my first few ACs, I used to panic when under timed conditions, but I found that using a clear structure helped as it meant that I could tackle each bit at a time.</p><p></p><p>I have also written some more general written exercise posts that are largely based on my own experiences with them (including Farrers) - I have quoted them below.</p><p></p><p><strong>Group Task</strong></p><p></p><p>This type of exercise is usually much more about how you work with others rather than dominating the conversation. I would aim to contribute early, listen actively, bring quieter people in (if appropriate!), and help the group stay on track by keeping an eye on the time and making notes of agreed points. If you are debating views with another person or team, show that you have listed to the other side by addressing their argument directly and adapt your response from there, rather than defaulting to rehearsed points.</p><p></p><p>If there is a disagreement in the team, I would acknowledge the different views but ultimately try to move the group towards a decision. I also would try not to panic if you feel something goes slightly wrong - in my AC, I fell victim to being labelled the 'quiet person that needed to be brought into the conversation', but I still ended up with an offer! Additionally, aim to contribute where you can and facilitate the team working well together above saying as many points as you can - in my AC, 3 out of 4 of my group members ended up with a VS offer, so I think ensuring that you work well as a team and supporting each other through the exercise can really help! </p><p></p><p>I hope that provides some pointers - it can be hard to prepare in advance for both of these exercises, but having an idea of what to expect can be useful! Best of luck with the AC, I'm sure you'll do great! <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Abbie Whitlock, post: 245199, member: 42112"] Hey! Congratulations on receiving the assessment centre invite, that is fantastic news!! Of course, happy to share my main thoughts after my experience with the Farrer & Co AC last cycle :) [B]Written Exercise[/B] The main thing I would make sure to do is to have an understanding of the types of structures and document types that could come up. I would look up things such as attendance notes, memos, client emails, letters, and reports, and make a note of what elements you need to include and structure it in that way. I also made use of headings and subheadings, and a mix of bullet points and prose, and I think that it made it easier to read and follow. Additionally, make sure you are clear on what practice area Farrers has - in my task, the hypothetical scenario included advising on certain areas of law and it was important to know whether Farrers actually advised on them. Other than that, I honestly think just give it your best shot and you'll do well! During my first few ACs, I used to panic when under timed conditions, but I found that using a clear structure helped as it meant that I could tackle each bit at a time. I have also written some more general written exercise posts that are largely based on my own experiences with them (including Farrers) - I have quoted them below. [B]Group Task[/B] This type of exercise is usually much more about how you work with others rather than dominating the conversation. I would aim to contribute early, listen actively, bring quieter people in (if appropriate!), and help the group stay on track by keeping an eye on the time and making notes of agreed points. If you are debating views with another person or team, show that you have listed to the other side by addressing their argument directly and adapt your response from there, rather than defaulting to rehearsed points. If there is a disagreement in the team, I would acknowledge the different views but ultimately try to move the group towards a decision. I also would try not to panic if you feel something goes slightly wrong - in my AC, I fell victim to being labelled the 'quiet person that needed to be brought into the conversation', but I still ended up with an offer! Additionally, aim to contribute where you can and facilitate the team working well together above saying as many points as you can - in my AC, 3 out of 4 of my group members ended up with a VS offer, so I think ensuring that you work well as a team and supporting each other through the exercise can really help! I hope that provides some pointers - it can be hard to prepare in advance for both of these exercises, but having an idea of what to expect can be useful! Best of luck with the AC, I'm sure you'll do great! :) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Our company is called, "The Corporate ___ Academy". What is the missing word here?
Post reply
Forum Home
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
Applications Discussion
TCLA Vacation Scheme Applications Discussion Thread 2025-26
Top
Bottom
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…