Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forum Home
Law Firms
Wiki
Events
Deadlines
Members
Leaderboards
Apply to Paul, Weiss
Premium Database
TCLA Premium:
Now half price (£30/month). Applications, interviews, commercial awareness + 700+ examples.
Join →
Forum Home
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
Applications Discussion
TCLA Vacation Scheme Applications Discussion Thread 2025-26
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Abbie Whitlock" data-source="post: 248172" data-attributes="member: 42112"><p>Hi!</p><p></p><p>I would say that either option is perfectly acceptable, as long as you can display clear commercial reasoning as to why that client would be a good strategic fit for the firm.</p><p></p><p>It is absolutely fine if the firm has worked with the company before, even a few years ago, and could even potentially strengthen your answer. For example, you could say that the firm already understands the client's business, there is an existing relationship, and there may be opportunities to expand into new practice areas or jurisdictions.</p><p></p><p>Equally, suggesting a completely new client is also a good option, provided that you justify it clearly (e.g. growth into a specific sector, alignment with the firm's strengths, strong pipeline of work, etc.).</p><p></p><p>What matters most is that you:</p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Explain why the client fits the firm's sector or practice area strengths</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Identify the type of work that the firm could win with the client</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Show awareness of the commercial opportunities and risks that arise from each client</li> </ul><p>Therefore, your reasoning is often far more important than the client that you choose. I hope that helps! <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Abbie Whitlock, post: 248172, member: 42112"] Hi! I would say that either option is perfectly acceptable, as long as you can display clear commercial reasoning as to why that client would be a good strategic fit for the firm. It is absolutely fine if the firm has worked with the company before, even a few years ago, and could even potentially strengthen your answer. For example, you could say that the firm already understands the client's business, there is an existing relationship, and there may be opportunities to expand into new practice areas or jurisdictions. Equally, suggesting a completely new client is also a good option, provided that you justify it clearly (e.g. growth into a specific sector, alignment with the firm's strengths, strong pipeline of work, etc.). What matters most is that you: [LIST] [*]Explain why the client fits the firm's sector or practice area strengths [*]Identify the type of work that the firm could win with the client [*]Show awareness of the commercial opportunities and risks that arise from each client [/LIST] Therefore, your reasoning is often far more important than the client that you choose. I hope that helps! :) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Our company is called, "The Corporate ___ Academy". What is the missing word here?
Post reply
Forum Home
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
Applications Discussion
TCLA Vacation Scheme Applications Discussion Thread 2025-26
Top
Bottom
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…