Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forum Home
Law Firms
Wiki
Events
Deadlines
Members
Leaderboards
Apply to Paul, Weiss
Premium Database
Hey Guest,
Have an interview coming up?
We’ve opened new mock interview slots this week.
Book here
TCLA Premium:
Now half price (£30/month). Applications, interviews, commercial awareness + 700+ examples.
Join →
Forum Home
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
Applications Discussion
TCLA Vacation Scheme Applications Discussion Thread 2025-26
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Abbie Whitlock" data-source="post: 249978" data-attributes="member: 42112"><p>Hey!</p><p></p><p>I would say that it really comes down to who you are writing to and what the exercise is testing. In most written exercises in an AC, if you are advising a client, it is usually better to prioritise writing in clear and plain English (i.e. what the clause does and why it matters commercially), rather than heavily referencing clause numbers. The assessors will often be looking at your ability to translate legal drafting into clear practical advice for clients.</p><p></p><p>However, I don't think there is anything wrong with briefly anchoring your point to the agreement were helpful (e.g. referring to the "termination clause") or being more precise if you are writing for someone internally.</p><p></p><p>I'd say a good balance is to explain the effect (+ any risks) in straightforward terms first, and then refer to the clause if it adds any clarity or helps identify it <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Abbie Whitlock, post: 249978, member: 42112"] Hey! I would say that it really comes down to who you are writing to and what the exercise is testing. In most written exercises in an AC, if you are advising a client, it is usually better to prioritise writing in clear and plain English (i.e. what the clause does and why it matters commercially), rather than heavily referencing clause numbers. The assessors will often be looking at your ability to translate legal drafting into clear practical advice for clients. However, I don't think there is anything wrong with briefly anchoring your point to the agreement were helpful (e.g. referring to the "termination clause") or being more precise if you are writing for someone internally. I'd say a good balance is to explain the effect (+ any risks) in straightforward terms first, and then refer to the clause if it adds any clarity or helps identify it :) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Our company is called, "The Corporate ___ Academy". What is the missing word here?
Post reply
Forum Home
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
Applications Discussion
TCLA Vacation Scheme Applications Discussion Thread 2025-26
Top
Bottom
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…