Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forum Home
Law Firms
Wiki
Events
Deadlines
Members
Leaderboards
Apply to Paul, Weiss
Premium Database
Hey Guest,
Have an interview coming up?
We’ve opened new mock interview slots this week.
Book here
TCLA Premium:
Now half price (£30/month). Applications, interviews, commercial awareness + 700+ examples.
Join →
Forum Home
Aspiring Lawyers - Interviews & Vacation Schemes
Commercial Awareness Discussion
The M&A Case Study Experiment - Part 1
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="rc1tby" data-source="post: 129268" data-attributes="member: 18643"><p>1) Reasons for purchase: Aquiring expetise (co-founders of Immersive), expanding market (access to EU), limiting threat from competitor (both in competing products and staff poaching), Improving own position within market (Immersive technology popular with developers).</p><p></p><p>2) Firstly, I would remind Elena that she knows this is happening, which means her staff have informed HR rather than entertaining the offers, this is a good sign. Secondly, I would advise her to look at her current employment contracts, do they include a non-compete/confidentiality clause. </p><p></p><p>Depending on how hostile a purchase this is, it may be possible to speak with Immersive and have them enfore a non-compete/confidentiality clause on the VP. If this is not possible then extend the clause 7.3 to include agents of the company.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="rc1tby, post: 129268, member: 18643"] 1) Reasons for purchase: Aquiring expetise (co-founders of Immersive), expanding market (access to EU), limiting threat from competitor (both in competing products and staff poaching), Improving own position within market (Immersive technology popular with developers). 2) Firstly, I would remind Elena that she knows this is happening, which means her staff have informed HR rather than entertaining the offers, this is a good sign. Secondly, I would advise her to look at her current employment contracts, do they include a non-compete/confidentiality clause. Depending on how hostile a purchase this is, it may be possible to speak with Immersive and have them enfore a non-compete/confidentiality clause on the VP. If this is not possible then extend the clause 7.3 to include agents of the company. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Our company is called, "The Corporate ___ Academy". What is the missing word here?
Post reply
Forum Home
Aspiring Lawyers - Interviews & Vacation Schemes
Commercial Awareness Discussion
The M&A Case Study Experiment - Part 1
Top
Bottom
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…