Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Law Firm Directory
Apply to Paul, Weiss
Forums
Law Firm Events
Law Firm Deadlines
TCLA TV
Members
Leaderboards
Premium Database
Premium Chat
Commercial Awareness
Future Trainee Advice
Forums
Aspiring Lawyers - Interviews & Vacation Schemes
Commercial Awareness Discussion
The M&A Case Study Experiment - Part 1
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="lawyering" data-source="post: 129560" data-attributes="member: 8434"><p>Q5:</p><p></p><p>First, the choice of English law may be based on the fact Digion is familiar with this body of law due to being headquartered in London. </p><p></p><p>Second, similar to New York law, English law provides a market standard that spans across many countries, especially English-speaking ones. English law is also known to be business-friendly; for example, it prioritises freedom of contract and so English judges often take a more hands-off approach in favour of party autonomy. </p><p></p><p>Finally, since the SPA is based on Digion’s terms (5.3 “...the initial draft of which will be prepared by the Buyer's advisers”) it’s likely any ambiguities in Digion’s terms may be questioned if any post-acquisition disputes arise. Therefore, a single, exclusive jurisdiction chosen beforehand is helpful for Digion as they can have more certainty as to how their terms will be interpreted i.e., in accordance with English law. Judicial precedent is not only extensive due to the long history of Chancery law, but the common law doctrine in England means English judges are more consistent and predictable in their approach compared with other jurisdictions.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="lawyering, post: 129560, member: 8434"] Q5: First, the choice of English law may be based on the fact Digion is familiar with this body of law due to being headquartered in London. Second, similar to New York law, English law provides a market standard that spans across many countries, especially English-speaking ones. English law is also known to be business-friendly; for example, it prioritises freedom of contract and so English judges often take a more hands-off approach in favour of party autonomy. Finally, since the SPA is based on Digion’s terms (5.3 “...the initial draft of which will be prepared by the Buyer's advisers”) it’s likely any ambiguities in Digion’s terms may be questioned if any post-acquisition disputes arise. Therefore, a single, exclusive jurisdiction chosen beforehand is helpful for Digion as they can have more certainty as to how their terms will be interpreted i.e., in accordance with English law. Judicial precedent is not only extensive due to the long history of Chancery law, but the common law doctrine in England means English judges are more consistent and predictable in their approach compared with other jurisdictions. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Our company is called, "The Corporate ___ Academy". What is the missing word here?
Post reply
Forums
Aspiring Lawyers - Interviews & Vacation Schemes
Commercial Awareness Discussion
The M&A Case Study Experiment - Part 1
Top
Bottom
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…