Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Law Firm Directory
Apply to Paul, Weiss
Forums
Law Firm Events
Law Firm Deadlines
TCLA TV
Members
Leaderboards
Premium Database
Premium Chat
Commercial Awareness
Future Trainee Advice
Forums
Aspiring Lawyers - Interviews & Vacation Schemes
Commercial Awareness Discussion
The M&A Case Study Experiment - Part 1
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="TCLA_Student" data-source="post: 129746" data-attributes="member: 27197"><p>Q1:</p><p>Leon Alexander and Maria May, the company's co-founders, have vast expertise running gaming servers, which is one of the main factors driving Digion's interest in purchasing Immersive. According to Elena Alyson, CEO of Digion, Immersive was also very well-liked by game developers. In order to grow its own company and enhance its distributed simulation software products for video games and corporate applications, Digion may be thinking of purchasing Immersive.</p><p></p><p>Q2:</p><p>Advise to include a non-solicitation provision in the prerequisites. The provision, which functions as a restrictive covenant, forbids Immersive and its personnel, including Tristan, from approaching Digion personnel about employment. It is important to negotiate the clause's scope and duration carefully.</p><p></p><p>Q3:</p><p>Lists the conditions under which the purchase is to occur are listed in Clause 5. However, as stated in Section 1.2, it is simply illustrative and not legally enforceable. Therefore, fulfilling these requirements does not ensure the acquisition.</p><p></p><p>Q4:</p><p>If I were the acting lawyer for the Seller, I would set a financial cap on the obligations and warranties. In other words, if the events or assertions of existing fact protected by the indemnities or guarantees, respectively, occur, I would cap the amount that the Seller may be obliged to reimburse the Buyer for. I would also impose time restrictions on the terms, such that the buyer would no longer be able to utilise the indemnities or guarantees to pursue damages claims after a certain amount of time had passed after the acquisition. From the standpoint of controlling the risks, it is crucial to safeguard the Seller's interests in the manner described above.</p><p></p><p>Q5:</p><p>Given that Digion's headquarters are in London, it would be advantageous for them if the English court has exclusive jurisdiction. This may be as a result of familiarity with the relevant laws and reliance on a legal firm's or in-house counsel's reliable knowledge. Additionally, it would increase process convenience and offer legal clarity.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="TCLA_Student, post: 129746, member: 27197"] Q1: Leon Alexander and Maria May, the company's co-founders, have vast expertise running gaming servers, which is one of the main factors driving Digion's interest in purchasing Immersive. According to Elena Alyson, CEO of Digion, Immersive was also very well-liked by game developers. In order to grow its own company and enhance its distributed simulation software products for video games and corporate applications, Digion may be thinking of purchasing Immersive. Q2: Advise to include a non-solicitation provision in the prerequisites. The provision, which functions as a restrictive covenant, forbids Immersive and its personnel, including Tristan, from approaching Digion personnel about employment. It is important to negotiate the clause's scope and duration carefully. Q3: Lists the conditions under which the purchase is to occur are listed in Clause 5. However, as stated in Section 1.2, it is simply illustrative and not legally enforceable. Therefore, fulfilling these requirements does not ensure the acquisition. Q4: If I were the acting lawyer for the Seller, I would set a financial cap on the obligations and warranties. In other words, if the events or assertions of existing fact protected by the indemnities or guarantees, respectively, occur, I would cap the amount that the Seller may be obliged to reimburse the Buyer for. I would also impose time restrictions on the terms, such that the buyer would no longer be able to utilise the indemnities or guarantees to pursue damages claims after a certain amount of time had passed after the acquisition. From the standpoint of controlling the risks, it is crucial to safeguard the Seller's interests in the manner described above. Q5: Given that Digion's headquarters are in London, it would be advantageous for them if the English court has exclusive jurisdiction. This may be as a result of familiarity with the relevant laws and reliance on a legal firm's or in-house counsel's reliable knowledge. Additionally, it would increase process convenience and offer legal clarity. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Our company is called, "The Corporate ___ Academy". What is the missing word here?
Post reply
Forums
Aspiring Lawyers - Interviews & Vacation Schemes
Commercial Awareness Discussion
The M&A Case Study Experiment - Part 1
Top
Bottom
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
