Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Law Firm Directory
Apply to Paul, Weiss
Forums
Law Firm Events
Law Firm Deadlines
TCLA TV
Members
Leaderboards
Premium Database
Premium Chat
Commercial Awareness
Future Trainee Advice
Forums
Aspiring Lawyers - Interviews & Vacation Schemes
Commercial Awareness Discussion
Uber drivers are workers, not self employed - UK Supreme Court
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dheepa" data-source="post: 64804" data-attributes="member: 1572"><p>On your first point, I think it's interesting to contrast this with Uber's position in the US. </p><p></p><p>Late last year Uber was able to get around a the 2019 California state assembly law on classifying gig economy workers as employees through a referendum. Voters essentially voted in favour of a middle ground where Uber would provide things like healthcare subsidies and accident insurance. The end cost of this has already been passed down to consumers but it was significantly less than what would have been the case if the workers had to be given full employment protection. While the UK judgement is evidently not something that can be worked around in this way, it will be interesting to see what kind of strategies Uber adopts to ensure that prices remain competitive despite the additional costs. </p><p></p><p>If I'm not mistaken JustEat has recently started offering minimum wage/pension contributions/sick pay to some of its workers. The drawback to this is that they are doing this through an outsourcing agency which while cuts costs for them, raises concerns on how well drivers rights are being protected anyway. I think there's a high chance Uber could try to adopt a similar model to comply with the judgement.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dheepa, post: 64804, member: 1572"] On your first point, I think it's interesting to contrast this with Uber's position in the US. Late last year Uber was able to get around a the 2019 California state assembly law on classifying gig economy workers as employees through a referendum. Voters essentially voted in favour of a middle ground where Uber would provide things like healthcare subsidies and accident insurance. The end cost of this has already been passed down to consumers but it was significantly less than what would have been the case if the workers had to be given full employment protection. While the UK judgement is evidently not something that can be worked around in this way, it will be interesting to see what kind of strategies Uber adopts to ensure that prices remain competitive despite the additional costs. If I'm not mistaken JustEat has recently started offering minimum wage/pension contributions/sick pay to some of its workers. The drawback to this is that they are doing this through an outsourcing agency which while cuts costs for them, raises concerns on how well drivers rights are being protected anyway. I think there's a high chance Uber could try to adopt a similar model to comply with the judgement. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Our company is called, "The Corporate ___ Academy". What is the missing word here?
Post reply
Forums
Aspiring Lawyers - Interviews & Vacation Schemes
Commercial Awareness Discussion
Uber drivers are workers, not self employed - UK Supreme Court
Top
Bottom
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…