Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Law Firm Directory
Apply to Paul, Weiss
Forums
Law Firm Events
Law Firm Deadlines
TCLA TV
Members
Leaderboards
Premium Database
Premium Chat
Commercial Awareness
Future Trainee Advice
🚨 Reed Smith has just announced its Direct Training Contract route!
The deadline is
20th June
.
👉
Read Becca's announcement post here
📝
Apply directly here
Forums
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
General Discussion
us firms
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jessica Booker" data-source="post: 88876" data-attributes="member: 2672"><p>One factor to consider is that there are many more people in MC firms in London than there are US firms, which may factor in to the reporting aspects. There is probably around 10,000 people working in MC firms in London alone, and where London offices tend to be much smaller for the US firms, you just won’t get as many incidences as there is probably fewer people. For instance, there is about 100 lawyers including partners at Wilkie’s office in London, it will be over 1,000 for a MC firm.</p><p></p><p>I know of stories, especially the high profile ones in the legal press, but I personally never experienced any issues within any of the MC firms I worked in. Having had conversations with many of my female friends I worked with on this, it seems like neither did they. I also know a whole host of women who wouldn’t have put up with it if it did happen to them. And if anything things have got better since I have left.</p><p></p><p>However, it does happens, but then it will happen in many organisations unfortunately - you could have the best firm culture in the world and yet it could be brought down by one individual.</p><p></p><p>My personal view is that it isn’t “extremely common” though - but that unfortunately there are incidences. I think firms are getting better at supporting people at calling out these incidences though, and in putting in measures to reduce/remove them too. Things have moved on significantly in terms of inclusion (and by that I don’t just mean for women) in my time and overwhelmingly in a positive direction.</p><p></p><p>I definitely wouldn’t assume all MC firms are the same though. Even if we do say for the sake of this conversation that the three you have mentioned all have a toxic sexist culture, then there are two that don’t and that you are potentially missing out on, and all because of them being labelled an MC firm. I’d personally advise not to label up firms in this way - some US firms will be much closer in culture than another MC firm.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jessica Booker, post: 88876, member: 2672"] One factor to consider is that there are many more people in MC firms in London than there are US firms, which may factor in to the reporting aspects. There is probably around 10,000 people working in MC firms in London alone, and where London offices tend to be much smaller for the US firms, you just won’t get as many incidences as there is probably fewer people. For instance, there is about 100 lawyers including partners at Wilkie’s office in London, it will be over 1,000 for a MC firm. I know of stories, especially the high profile ones in the legal press, but I personally never experienced any issues within any of the MC firms I worked in. Having had conversations with many of my female friends I worked with on this, it seems like neither did they. I also know a whole host of women who wouldn’t have put up with it if it did happen to them. And if anything things have got better since I have left. However, it does happens, but then it will happen in many organisations unfortunately - you could have the best firm culture in the world and yet it could be brought down by one individual. My personal view is that it isn’t “extremely common” though - but that unfortunately there are incidences. I think firms are getting better at supporting people at calling out these incidences though, and in putting in measures to reduce/remove them too. Things have moved on significantly in terms of inclusion (and by that I don’t just mean for women) in my time and overwhelmingly in a positive direction. I definitely wouldn’t assume all MC firms are the same though. Even if we do say for the sake of this conversation that the three you have mentioned all have a toxic sexist culture, then there are two that don’t and that you are potentially missing out on, and all because of them being labelled an MC firm. I’d personally advise not to label up firms in this way - some US firms will be much closer in culture than another MC firm. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Our company is called, "The Corporate ___ Academy". What is the missing word here?
Post reply
Forums
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
General Discussion
us firms
Top
Bottom
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…