Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forum Home
Law Firms
Wiki
Events
Deadlines
Members
Leaderboards
Apply to Paul, Weiss
Premium Database
Hey Guest,
Have an interview coming up?
We’ve opened new mock interview slots this week.
Book here
TCLA Premium:
Now half price (£30/month). Applications, interviews, commercial awareness + 700+ examples.
Join →
Forum Home
Welcome To TCLA!
Introduce Yourself Here!
Wee Intro
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Abbie Whitlock" data-source="post: 217446" data-attributes="member: 42112"><p>That's a really great question - and you're definitely not alone in feeling a bit torn between the two! I had the same dilemma when I was applying, as I knew I learnt the most when I had on-the-job-training, but I was more comfortable with the formal training. I think most of us thrive with a mix of both, and the balance often depends on the environment and the people you are learning from.</p><p></p><p>From your past experiences, it sounds like you're adaptable and can take a lot from either style. The Citizens Advice experience shows that you can rise to the challenge when thrown in the deep end, and your hobbies show that you also enjoy having space to step back and absorb structured knowledge. Both are extremely valuable traits in law - sometimes you'll need to dive right in and learn on your feet, other times it'll be about understanding the frameworks and applying them carefully.</p><p></p><p>Instead of seeing it as choosing one over the other, you might think about what balance helps you grow the most. Some firms lean heavily on structured programmes, whilst others focus on learning by doing and giving early responsibility (and a lot of firms will have a mix of both!). It might help to reflect on which approach you feel most comfortable with and where you tend to learn best, and then use that guide when comparing firms.</p><p></p><p>Talking to trainees or associates during open days or networking events is a great way to get a feel for what the training actually looks like in practice. Even looking at how firms describe their training contracts (e.g. "formal seat rotations" vs "early responsibility on client work") can give you a sense of their approach.</p><p></p><p>That fact that you are reflecting on your learning style is the important part, and it'll make it much easier to spot the environments where you'll thrive! <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Abbie Whitlock, post: 217446, member: 42112"] That's a really great question - and you're definitely not alone in feeling a bit torn between the two! I had the same dilemma when I was applying, as I knew I learnt the most when I had on-the-job-training, but I was more comfortable with the formal training. I think most of us thrive with a mix of both, and the balance often depends on the environment and the people you are learning from. From your past experiences, it sounds like you're adaptable and can take a lot from either style. The Citizens Advice experience shows that you can rise to the challenge when thrown in the deep end, and your hobbies show that you also enjoy having space to step back and absorb structured knowledge. Both are extremely valuable traits in law - sometimes you'll need to dive right in and learn on your feet, other times it'll be about understanding the frameworks and applying them carefully. Instead of seeing it as choosing one over the other, you might think about what balance helps you grow the most. Some firms lean heavily on structured programmes, whilst others focus on learning by doing and giving early responsibility (and a lot of firms will have a mix of both!). It might help to reflect on which approach you feel most comfortable with and where you tend to learn best, and then use that guide when comparing firms. Talking to trainees or associates during open days or networking events is a great way to get a feel for what the training actually looks like in practice. Even looking at how firms describe their training contracts (e.g. "formal seat rotations" vs "early responsibility on client work") can give you a sense of their approach. That fact that you are reflecting on your learning style is the important part, and it'll make it much easier to spot the environments where you'll thrive! :) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Our company is called, "The Corporate ___ Academy". What is the missing word here?
Post reply
Forum Home
Welcome To TCLA!
Introduce Yourself Here!
Wee Intro
Top
Bottom
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…