- Sep 7, 2024
- 1,275
- 1,482
I got pfo from all the firms in the application stage. Though I have some direct TC applications pending review, I am wondering how to improve the four applications I have left to submit (and for winter VS in the worst-case scenario).
I have written about my academic interests and work experience in litigation, investigations, and corporate crime relating to the firm's reputation in these practices and available seats. I included a few lines demonstrating my interests in regulatory compliance, investment funds, and banking and finance (I studied these topics in the modules of my LLM in Banking and Finance at RG uni and worked with regulatory compliance and banking during an internship in a regtech).
How to balance the interests in contentious in the applications?
Should I strategically focus on my interests in transactional seats (banking and finance, investment funds) and forget about litigation during the application process to enhance my chances?
@Jessica Booker @Andrei Radu @Amma Usman do you have any insights? I tried to follow the application guide, but unsuccessfully.
I am sorry to hear about the PFOs. Writing applications is like a muscle that constantly needs flexing. I assure you that despite those PFOs, you would have improved your writing skills - and that’s the most important thing beyond those rejection emails.
Another thing is that if you genuinely aren’t interested in the contentious practices as much, then that’s fine. It just requires you to apply to more transactional-focused law firms, since showcasing that link would be easier given your broader interests and experiences. That said, early on in your career I don’t recommend throwing away exploring that side too (this is me talking beyond the application stage). When the time comes, you can choose to do more rotations in transactional law, but at least one in a contentious seat. I have spoken to many lawyers who have mentioned that their qualification options shocked them. However, it all boils down to personal preference on your part.
Back to the topic of discussion. If you’re comfortable, you could post your answers to why law and why X firm on the forum, and I could review them and provide feedback.