• Get Everything You Need to Secure a Training Contract
    Now half the price. Join TCLA Premium for £30/month and get step-by-step application support, daily commercial awareness practice, and 700+ successful examples of past applications and interview experiences. Plus so much more.
    Join Premium →
  • What do Private Equity Lawyers Actually Do? (Ropes & Gray)
    Wednesday, 14 January 2026 6:00 pm – 7:00 pm (UK) Hosted on Zoom
    Discover the high-stakes world of private equity and see how lawyers power multi-million-pound deals behind the scenes.
    Register Here →

TCLA Vacation Scheme Applications Discussion Thread 2024-25

Status
Not open for further replies.

ke.nabbk26

Valued Member
  • Dec 19, 2022
    121
    111
    For the first question, while I do not have a lot of prior knowledge about the firm, I do believe Chambers and Legal 500 rankings are good indicators for a firm's practice area focus and strengths. Based on that, it seems like Winston & Strawn is not simply a litigation boutique, but that it covers a wider array of practices to service a wider client base. Looking at its Legal 500 rankings (as Chambers only ranks its finance department), we see the firm is recognized for:
    • Transactional: for finance, particularly bank lending; for corporate, particularly mid market corporate M&A and PE;
    • Disputes: general commercial litigation; particularly high rankings also in international arbitration and class action defence for product liability (the highest rankings of all its practices, which I think explains the firm's reputation for disputes)
    • Advisory: competition law; also its aviation and sports practices;
    For the second question my interpretation would partly depend on what other questions are asked in the application form. Nonetheless, all other things being equal, I would bring the scope down to something along the lines of 'What aspects of work/types of work/work environments motivate me to excel?'. Then, I would name and expand on two or three characteristics that I can link with an experience. Finally I would make a connection to the career of a commercial solicitor and try to explain how my motivations are aligned with it.

    Can I mention that one or more partners are consistently ranked, even if the firm's department is not ranked?

    I am researching a firm for the direct TC, and they have two partners ranked in practices I am interested in, but the departments are not ranked.
     

    Harvey Specter

    Legendary Member
    Jul 4, 2024
    940
    3,483
    Would it look really bad if I have a script with me when I give a presentation during interview
    If it’s a reasonable adjustment that you have requested I don’t see why it would look bad to the interviewer from their perspective. 🙂🙂

    I think it would be preferable if you wrote bullet points down though instead of reading off a script. That way you have a structure in mind and keep the presentation more conversational and flexible. This is more important because they could ask you certain questions while you are delivering the presentation.

    I think @Jessica Booker can give you a better answer than this one because idk for sure. 🙂🙂​
     
    Last edited:
    • Like
    Reactions: Toomanypfo

    lawstudent2

    Legendary Member
    Gold Member
    Premium Member
    Dec 9, 2024
    167
    151
    Heya @lawstudent2

    I think taking 3-4 minutes for the big questions (e.g. why law, why the firm, and why you) is absolutely fine. What’s most important is that the interviewer can follow and recall the main points of your answer, and this is where structure becomes essential. Summarising your key points briefly at the beginning and wrapping up with a conclusion at the end can really help the interviewer remember your answer.

    I’d also recommend practising with someone, whether a friend, mentor, or even recording yourself. Ask them to summarise your answer afterward to check whether your main points were clear and memorable. For these longer questions, make sure you're not cramming in too much detail and rushing through your answer to fit the 3-4 minute timeframe. Prioritise depth over breadth where possible.

    For other types of questions, aiming for 2-3 minutes with a clear structure should work well. If you feel like answering off the cuff will lead you to waffle, I'd recommend just taking a minute to think about the main points you want to hit. Overall, always focus on answering the question directly, and and keep in mind what you think will allow your interviewer to best recall the main points you've made.
    Thank you that's super helpful
     

    lawstudent2

    Legendary Member
    Gold Member
    Premium Member
    Dec 9, 2024
    167
    151
    I believe this depends on the length of the interview. For questions like “Why law?” or “Why this firm?”, you should aim to spend two to three minutes answering each in a thirty-minute interview. That’s enough time to make your points clearly without dragging on. If the interview is longer, such as an hour, you can take closer to three to four minutes to add a bit more detail.

    The key is to hit your main reasons quickly and confidently. Start with your strongest point first. For example, with “Why law?”, lead with what sparked your interest or what keeps you motivated. Then follow with something more personal or reflective to show depth. For “Why this firm?”, focus on specific things that set them apart, like their work in a particular sector, and link that back to your career goals.

    Practising how you deliver these answers is crucial. Your vocal tone and confidence in what you are saying will make all the difference. A strong start will help prevent interruptions and keep the conversation flowing naturally. Another thing is to not practice too heavily for such questions - and I appreciate this may sound contradictory to all I’ve said. Pre-prepped answers can always be caught, and you want these passions to sound natural. You should still know your main drivers from within though, and fall back on these during the interview.

    The idea is to balance being concise with showing that you’ve put thought into your answers.
    Thank you so much that's super helpful
     
    • Like
    Reactions: Amma Usman

    gazdgazd11

    Legendary Member
    Premium Member
    Feb 27, 2024
    197
    278
    Trust me, I am in exactly the same position. I completely understand the lack of consideration given to perspectives outside his own experience, bear in mind he qualified some time ago and with a TC straight from university. I don't think it's fair to assume everyone is able to self-fund, but if you can, it appears to be the way to go. My advice previously was based on the idea that this candidate had already undergone the very expensive process of GDL and multiple post graduate degrees on top of his undergrad.

    As for everyone who isn't necessarily as fortunate. Please go and have a look at the LLM SQE process. As far as I know, not only does it qualify for a postgraduate loan, but it goes up to nearly 13 grand that is inclusive of the booking fee for the exams. On top of that you are able to do it outside of London, allowing for a lower cost of living if you were to house share in Leeds like some people I know. This combined with the potential scholarship options from BPP might allow you to bridge the gap.
    fyi - I self funded the LPC and it didn’t get me anywhere (2 application cycles now). I know many people who got TCs without self funding so it’s really not a major barrier.
     
    Status
    Not open for further replies.

    About Us

    The Corporate Law Academy (TCLA) was founded in 2018 because we wanted to improve the legal journey. We wanted more transparency and better training. We wanted to form a community of aspiring lawyers who care about becoming the best version of themselves.

    Get Our 2026 Vacation Scheme Guide

    Nail your vacation scheme applications this year with our latest guide, with sample answers to law firm questions.