TCLA Vacation Scheme Applications Discussion Thread 2024-25

suhana

Distinguished Member
Mar 17, 2024
64
32
Hi @Amma Usman @Ram Sabaratnam @Andrei Radu

had a quick query about situational interviews. just an example question below

You are working on a piece of work assigned to you by your supervisor. A partner on another matter assigns you with another piece of work. The work is complex and the partner is unavailable, while your supervisor is in a client meeting. It becomes clear that you won't be able to complete both within the deadlines, what do you do?

in this scenario, how do you suggest we approach answers in interviews? usually the first point approach would be to ask your supervisor for advice, but since that is not possible here, what is your advice to assess the deadlines and priority of the work ourselves when someone senior is unavailable? is it better to ask someone on the same deal, maybe a senior associate about the nature of the deadline and if its pressing?
 
  • ℹ️
Reactions: Chris Brown and lou1707

Andrei Radu

Legendary Member
Staff member
Future Trainee
Gold Member
Premium Member
Sep 9, 2024
769
1,435
This may have been asked already but... I have an in-person AC interview coming up and I believe that there will be (at a minimum) two fee-earners interviewing me. When one of them asks me a question, and I have to respond, should I look at both interviewers back-and-forth when responding? Or should I only focus on the person that’s asked me?

Alternatively, does it depend on the question/who is writing notes on my answers lol💀

@Jessica Booker @Amma Usman
To add to Amma's great response, I think you should try to engage with both, but focus more on the person who is not taking the notes, as that is the person who you will likely be able to hold more eye contact with. Also, at least in my experience, it tends to be a partner/counsel leading the interview with questions and an associate taking the notes. Since the impression you make on the partner will likely influence your progression chances more, you want to concentrate on creating the best rapport with them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: seaweed.bond

Andrei Radu

Legendary Member
Staff member
Future Trainee
Gold Member
Premium Member
Sep 9, 2024
769
1,435
Hi @Amma Usman @Ram Sabaratnam @Andrei Radu

had a quick query about situational interviews. just an example question below

You are working on a piece of work assigned to you by your supervisor. A partner on another matter assigns you with another piece of work. The work is complex and the partner is unavailable, while your supervisor is in a client meeting. It becomes clear that you won't be able to complete both within the deadlines, what do you do?

in this scenario, how do you suggest we approach answers in interviews? usually the first point approach would be to ask your supervisor for advice, but since that is not possible here, what is your advice to assess the deadlines and priority of the work ourselves when someone senior is unavailable? is it better to ask someone on the same deal, maybe a senior associate about the nature of the deadline and if its pressing?
In managing this situation, I think you should show your capacity for a multi-faceted consideration of multiple relevant considerations. Conceptually (though not necessarily in terms of actually expressing the points this way) I would split the factors into two categories: substantive and procedural considerations.

Regarding substantive considerations, I will list bellow a non-exhaustive list of aspects you should consider in deciding which piece of work to do:
  • How strict are the two deadlines? Is it easier to push back one more than the other?
  • How important is delivering the work product for servicing the entire matter - ie is any of the tasks essential to the progression of the workstreams?
  • How important is the timely completion of the entire matter? If one is for an transformational deal for a core client while one is for an isolated corporate governance review matter, this should play a role in your decision-making.
  • How likely is it that someone else will be able to complete each of the tasks, supposing you choose the other one?
As for procedural considerations:
  • Involve an associate in the decision making process, ideally someone who is working on the matter that the partner is on. Firstly, this will likely be necessary to learn the information you need to make a judgement on the substantive merits on doing one task or the other (as the prompt stipulates you do not know much about the new matter). Secondly, since you are a trainee and are thus unsure how you should go about weighing the different factors and making your decision, their input will be very useful.
  • However, prima facie, you prioritize the work you have already committed to doing: if the merits of doing one task or the other are roughly similar, you should probably choose to do the first one. You have already committed to it and created an expectations in this regard, but you have not yet responded to the partner request.
  • Whichever option you end up choosing, do your best to find someone else to do the other tasks instead of you - the associate you contact might help you with the work or help you find someone else who is available to help (as associates tend to know people's availability a lot more than trainees do); alternatively, you can contact other trainees yourself to ask for assistance.
  • Finally, although both are unavailable at the moment, make sure to inform both the supervisor and partner of the situation and how you have managed it as soon as possible.
 


Write your reply...

About Us

The Corporate Law Academy (TCLA) was founded in 2018 because we wanted to improve the legal journey. We wanted more transparency and better training. We wanted to form a community of aspiring lawyers who care about becoming the best version of themselves.

Newsletter

Discover the most relevant business news, access our law firm analysis, and receive our best advice for aspiring lawyers.