Anyone heard back from King & Spalding?
No, not yet!Anyone heard back from King & Spalding?
Thank you for your encouraging words.I believe it‘s always worth applying regardless of the stats. If they have a direct TC portal still open, then they are more likely than not going to offer at least a few slots via that. You never know unless you give it a shot…![]()
Generally they don’t take that long. It was a week for me. This was back in 2019, however.Anyone know how long slaughters take to reply following DTC interview?
So sorry to hear this - how long roughly did it take to hear after you took the test ?Hogan Lovells pfo post-WG
The vac schemers have now all had their offers/PFO’s so I was hoping DTC might hear something this week but alas…does anybody what ever happened to goodwin post VI for the direct TC? its been more than 2 months now
True but you only need one. W&C do give out direct TCs. A LinkedIn connection got W&C DTC. Plus W&C have many TCs generally. Always worth a shot I think.The only thing that was holding me back in applying for the DTC was the low chance of success for W&C Direct TCs applications, I am aware that most TCs go out to successful vac schemers. 😅
Just about that LinkedIn connection with the DTC, did they have prior vac schemes/paralegal experience?True but you only need one. W&C do give out direct TCs. A LinkedIn connection got W&C DTC. Plus W&C have many TCs generally. Always worth a shot I think.
Thanks for the encouraging words! I will apply and give it my best go!!! (Fingers crossed)True but you only need one. W&C do give out direct TCs. A LinkedIn connection got W&C DTC. Plus W&C have many TCs generally. Always worth a shot I think.
They had two law work experiences.Just about that LinkedIn connection with the DTC, did they have prior vac schemes/paralegal experience?
Adding on to this, I know someone personally who got the W&C dtc with no prior legal work experience and a non-law degree, so it’s defo worth a shot.They had two law work experiences.
Hi @billyonthespeeddial If you can think of a plausible way to feature it into an email (perhaps informing them of unavailability for future dates?) I think you should do it. My view has always been that having a firm know about other VS offers can significantly increase your progression chances (I will quote a post where I anaysed this topic in more depth) and does not come with any substantial downside. One of my friends who had actually been waitlisted post-AC was offered a VS not long after informing the firm of VS offers elsewhere.@Jessica Booker @Andrei Radu any thoughts on emailing grad rec to flag my upcoming vacation scheme at a similar firm where their application form specifically asked for future vacancies (but I've already sent it?)? ty
I would. Besides this definitely being valuable legal work experience, having a VS offer is a very impressive achievement that will immediately distinguish you from the majority of other applicants. Essentially, I believe it has the effect of instantly communicating to graduate recruitment that you were deemed to be a top 98-99% percentile candidate by a peer firm. This will invariably have an important impact in both (i) boosting up your candidate profile; and (ii) making graduate recruiters look at your application through different eyes, and thus making it more likely they will rate other aspects of it higher as well.
Even if they wanted to assess the rest of it independently and objectively, there is a lot of research in social psychology indicating that knowledge of peer opinions has a prevailing impact on one's evaluative judgements. This is particularly impactful in situations presenting a high degree of ambiguity and discretion, and I would argue the decision of whether to classify an application as a whole (so, one involving the multi-faceted assessment of a lot of factors) as "good, but not quite impressive enough" or "great, impressive enough to progress" has exactly those features.
As such, my view is that you would be doing yourself a disservice in not including the upcoming scheme. However, you can try to reduce the risk of it seeming like you put it there merely for purposes of impressing by adding in the description section (i) a short summary as to why you had applied for this firm and what your general applications strategy has been; and/or (ii) the seats you will do in the scheme and the work you expect to complete; and how that will be relevant for the development of your skills.
Fantastic, thank you very much!Hi @billyonthespeeddial If you can think of a plausible way to feature it into an email (perhaps informing them of unavailability for future dates?) I think you should do it. My view has always been that having a firm know about other VS offers can significantly increase your progression chances (I will quote a post where I anaysed this topic in more depth) and does not come with any substantial downside. One of my friends who had actually been waitlisted post-AC was offered a VS not long after informing the firm of VS offers elsewhere.
Thanks a lot!Hey there,
Just checked their website and saw they recruit 12-15 trainees each year, which is great. I have attached their GR website for more info -
Training Contract | Trainee Lawyers | Penningtons Manches Cooper
We introduce trainees to challenging cases and recognise the value of real responsibility and direct client contact with experienced solicitors are always ready to give support when needed.www.penningtonslaw.com
Will you be told in advance the name of the partners that are going to interview you?Generally they don’t take that long. It was a week for me. This was back in 2019, however.