• Reed Smith is live in the forum now
    AMA Live now
    Graduate Recruitment and SQE interns from Reed Smith are here to answer your questions.
    Join the live thread →
  • Willkie Live: How to Write a Successful Vacation Scheme Application
    7 Oct 2025 5:30pm (UK) Zoom (registration required)
    Learn exactly how to write a successful application to Willkie Farr & Gallagher, with live examples + Q&A with Gemma Baker.
    Register on Zoom →

TCLA Vacation Scheme Applications Discussion Thread 2025-26

Andrei Radu

Legendary Member
Staff member
Future Trainee
Gold Member
Premium Member
Sep 9, 2024
800
1,468
Does anyone have any tips on writing an Open Day application for Davis Polk?
I normally wouldn't ask but this question has tripped me up a bit as I'm not 100% sure if I can really find 500 words for an Open Day application without waffling.

My interests are very much in finding out about deal origination (US-sourced vs Europe-sourced), proportion of work in certain practice areas (I've seen a video where the previous Training Principal and current Head of Europe talked about their laser focus on corporate finance), exploring the culture in-person, the ratio of on-the-job vs formal training, and how all of these things intertwine. Not sure if I can/should try and personalise every point for an Open Day application either.
Hi @DavidJC I think what you should do in general for an Open Day application is to:
  1. Identify a Unique Selling Point of the firm (USP) you are interested in
  2. Explain why you are interested in the firm's USP, making reference and describing any relevant experiences and achievements
  3. Analyse the USP more in depth based on your research and then express a desire to learn more about said USP at the open day
For instance, say you express an interest in the firm's leading M&A practice. Firstly, you would want to explain why you are interested in this type of work by picking out which features of it attract you more than the features of other practices. At this stage, you should also describe (using a STAR structure) any relevant experience (and relevant need not mean solely an M&A-related role; it could be a negotiations competition, a prior firm event, a Forage Experience etc.).

Then, you should go on and explain the firm's USP in more detail based on your research. You could thus firstly discuss Davis Polk's global M&A practice, which consistently ranks in the top 10 firms by total M&A deal value it advises on and which has one of the highest average deal values in the world, suggesting the firm has a high deal value-lower deal volume model; you could then express an interest in learning more about how this model functions. Then, you could analyse Davis Polk's London practice in more detail, focusing on how it has a small headcount compared to similarly ranked rivals (it has a Chambers 4 ranking, similar to White & Case, a firm with a headcount roughly 6 times higher), suggesting it punches significantly above its weight in terms of high-end M&A work - and then, on this point you could look at some of the notable mandates the firm recently worked on. Next, you could mention how the firm is particularly active in the TMT and life sciences sectors and how its client base tends to be formed of institutional relationships rather than individual partner relationships. Further, you could go on to look at how efficient the firm's corporate practice is, as it has consistently boasted of some of the highest revenue per corporate partner and revenue per corporate lawyer figures in London, and then explore how this ties into the firm's general sky-high profitability (Davis Polk has the third highest PEP in London, only behind Kirkland and Quinn Emanuel).

All of these are just features that I think you can mention and elaborate on in your analysis to make it more persuasive and to also fill the word count - but none needs to necessarily be featured; this is simply something you should choose depending on how your answer shapes up. You should think about exploring similarly very specific features and sub features of the firm's other USPs, be they related to strategy and growth, other practices, or trainee programme. To get the relevant information, I would highly recommend you read the firm's TCLA Law Firm Profile here, which I have recently updated for the 2025/2026 application cycle.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jaysen

aspiringsolicitor2027

Active Member
Premium Member
Sep 19, 2024
10
15
Having spoken to recruiters about this, by "work" they generally understand a role involving a contract and payment, so I think internships and vacation schemes would be excluded from the experiences you can base your answer on here. That said, I do not think it would be an issue if you mentioned such experiences so long as this is a mere tangential mention that reinforces a broader point which is based on a non-work/study experience.
I see, thank you!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Andrei Radu

londonlawyer

Distinguished Member
Dec 17, 2024
52
49
I have a question, the answer to which might be obvious. For this question 'Akin’s London office works across a range of practice areas. Which area(s) interests you most, and why?', do I explain why a practice area in general interests me or why that practice area at Akin specifically interests me? I have already mentioned their Funds team in the why Akin question and was wondering whether the above question would be where I explain my interest in PE/funds by discussing open days and VS experience. Or do I expand on Akin's expertise in Funds?
 

Bhavana

Well-Known Member
Feb 8, 2025
21
52
I have a question, the answer to which might be obvious. For this question 'Akin’s London office works across a range of practice areas. Which area(s) interests you most, and why?', do I explain why a practice area in general interests me or why that practice area at Akin specifically interests me? I have already mentioned their Funds team in the why Akin question and was wondering whether the above question would be where I explain my interest in PE/funds by discussing open days and VS experience. Or do I expand on Akin's expertise in Funds?
I think you could discuss why a practice area interests you, and then discuss why Akin in particular would be an ideal firm to explore that area. You could discuss Funds again but just be cautious of repeating anything that you've already mentioned in the other question
 

About Us

The Corporate Law Academy (TCLA) was founded in 2018 because we wanted to improve the legal journey. We wanted more transparency and better training. We wanted to form a community of aspiring lawyers who care about becoming the best version of themselves.

Newsletter

Discover the most relevant business news, access our law firm analysis, and receive our best advice for aspiring lawyers.