• WIN: Lunch with Willkie Trainees!
    15 Oct 2025 5:00 pm – 6:00 pm (UK) Zoom (registration required)
    Put your knowledge of Willkie Farr & Gallagher to the test in this interactive quiz session. The winner will enjoy lunch with Willkie trainees!
    Register on Zoom →

TCLA Vacation Scheme Applications Discussion Thread 2025-26

TortillaTC

Esteemed Member
May 10, 2025
99
65
Hi! @Abbie Whitlock I attended Willkie's application writing event yesterday, and their grad rec said that we shouldn't talk about skills developed in the WE sections but mere results/achievements in each WE, and she recommended the CAR structure (context; action; result) => is it okay to mix action+result together, since writing about them separately seems a bit odd? e.g. "I drafted x document (action), that helped y.. (result)" instead of putting the result in the next paragraph?

Also: she advised against describing skills in WE entries but their open day application form doesn't have a separate skills Q - would it be a really bad idea to talk about relevant skills in WE after all? she pointed out that candidates sometimes connect experiences with unrealistic skills (e.g. working at McDonalds won't give you commercial awareness) but what about actually valid skills eg. Juggling an internship with my studies developed my time management skills that will help me manage conflicting deadlines as a trainee?
 
Last edited:
Reactions: Abbie Whitlock

Abbie Whitlock

Administrator
Staff member
Gold Member
Premium Member
Sep 11, 2025
186
152
Hi @Abbie Whitlock , I have a question on the DLA Piper Vac Scheme Application question 2. The question is : Select one article from the DLA Piper Insights page on a client sector that interests you. How does it align with your personal and professional ambitions? (Max 200 words.)

There is a podcast episode within the Insights Page on a topic I find really interesting. Would this count as an article for the purpose of this question? Or would you suggest that I find another written article instead?
Hey!

That’s a great question! While the podcast seems really interesting, I’d recommend choosing a written article for this question - just to be on the safe side. Since DLA Piper specifically asks you to select an article, they’re probably expecting a direct reference to a written piece from their Insights Page that you can analyse and link clearly to your ambitions.

Using a written article could make it easier to structure your answer and demonstrate your ability to engage with DLA Piper’s insights in a clear and thoughtful way. However, you could potentially draw inspiration from the podcast when choosing an article on a similar topic, so your genuine interest comes through :)
 

msclm

Star Member
  • Oct 22, 2024
    25
    44
    Apologies if this is a dumb question, but this is my first actual application cycle and I was wondering why firms issue rejections and then don’t progress people soon after? I’ve noticed so far that people have been rejected from HSF and macfarlanes but they haven’t released any assessment centres yet? Is this normal?
     

    Abbie Whitlock

    Administrator
    Staff member
    Gold Member
    Premium Member
    Sep 11, 2025
    186
    152
    Hi! @Abbie Whitlock I attended Willkie's application writing event yesterday, and their grad rec said that we shouldn't talk about skills developed in the WE sections but mere results/achievements in each WE, and she recommended the CAR structure (context; action; result) => is it okay to mix action+result together, since writing about them separately seems a bit odd? e.g. "I drafted x document (action), that helped y.. (result)" instead of putting the result in the next paragraph?

    Also: she advised against describing skills in WE entries but their open day application form doesn't have a separate skills Q - would it be a really bad idea to talk about relevant skills in WE after all? she pointed out that candidates sometimes connect experiences with unrealistic skills (e.g. working at McDonalds won't give you commercial awareness) but what about actually valid skills eg. Juggling an internship with my studies developed my time management skills that will help me manage conflicting deadlines as a trainee?
    Hello!

    On your first question: I think it’s totally fine to combine the action and result into one sentence or short paragraph, especially in a short work experience section where space is limited. Something along the lines of ‘I drafted X document, which was later used in Y’ is clear and efficient, and shows the impact whilst making the most of the space.

    In relation to including skills, I’d say that this is definitely firm dependent. I would follow the advice that the Willkie graduate recruitment outlined for their application (as that will reflect what they are looking for). Some firms will prefer a very factual, CV-style approach whereas others are more open to candidates discussing key skills. The key is to keep it relevant and realistic, such as your example about juggling an internship and studies to show time management - that is a solid, credible link.

    I would say that as a general rule of thumb (unless otherwise stated), I would link key transferable skills if they are relevant, but try to not overdo it. Firms will want to see that you know what skills trainees need and that you can demonstrate how you have them, but I wouldn’t try and force a connection that isn’t there.

    I hope that helps! :)
     
    • Like
    Reactions: TortillaTC

    TortillaTC

    Esteemed Member
    May 10, 2025
    99
    65
    Hello!

    On your first question: I think it’s totally fine to combine the action and result into one sentence or short paragraph, especially in a short work experience section where space is limited. Something along the lines of ‘I drafted X document, which was later used in Y’ is clear and efficient, and shows the impact whilst making the most of the space.

    In relation to including skills, I’d say that this is definitely firm dependent. I would follow the advice that the Willkie graduate recruitment outlined for their application (as that will reflect what they are looking for). Some firms will prefer a very factual, CV-style approach whereas others are more open to candidates discussing key skills. The key is to keep it relevant and realistic, such as your example about juggling an internship and studies to show time management - that is a solid, credible link.

    I would say that as a general rule of thumb (unless otherwise stated), I would link key transferable skills if they are relevant, but try to not overdo it. Firms will want to see that you know what skills trainees need and that you can demonstrate how you have them, but I wouldn’t try and force a connection that isn’t there.

    I hope that helps! :)
    Thank you so much, very helpful!!
     
    • 🤝
    Reactions: Abbie Whitlock

    About Us

    The Corporate Law Academy (TCLA) was founded in 2018 because we wanted to improve the legal journey. We wanted more transparency and better training. We wanted to form a community of aspiring lawyers who care about becoming the best version of themselves.

    Newsletter

    Discover the most relevant business news, access our law firm analysis, and receive our best advice for aspiring lawyers.