• Get Everything You Need to Secure a Training Contract
    Now half the price. Join TCLA Premium for £30/month and get step-by-step application support, daily commercial awareness practice, and 700+ successful examples of past applications and interview experiences. Plus so much more.
    Join Premium →
  • Office Hours with BCLP (Live Q&A)
    29 Oct 2025 5:30 pm – 6:30 pm (UK) Hosted on TCLA TV
    Join Isabel Elsey, Legal Recruitment Manager at BCLP, for a live Q&A session. Get details on secondments, innovation, growth areas, and everything else you’ve wanted to ask about life at BCLP!

    📺 Join Event

TCLA Vacation Scheme Applications Discussion Thread 2025-26

apap

Star Member
Gold Member
Premium Member
Feb 3, 2025
42
32
not sure !! none of it had timed elements but not sure if they take time into consideration! pretty sure it took me longer than half an hour and i’m usually quite quick on tests - it’s just bc there’s a mix of sjt and numerical questions which took me a while and then the untimed vi
Untimed VI sounds like a double edged sword. How did you find the VI? Predictable?
 

johnsmith

Legendary Member
Oct 2, 2025
133
147
Anyone done Taylor Wessing's first stage assessment? How did you find it?
Up there with the toughest due to the way the time limit is structured - definitely check out their hub!

Untimed VI sounds like a double edged sword. How did you find the VI? Predictable?
The unlimited prep was good - I employed @Abbie Whitlock's method of recording before, and I definitely felt I gave stronger answers as a result.
 
  • 🏆
Reactions: Abbie Whitlock

c.t.tc

Distinguished Member
  • Jun 10, 2025
    66
    58
    that's good to know! thank you! also, first the email says we have 10 calendar days then if you scroll down it says 5 day deadline. think i should just complete it today to avoid confusion as today is the fifth day since the invitation. firms harking on about attention to detail but don't practice what they preach ahh
    I emailed them to ask and they confirmed we have the 10 days :)
     
    • Love
    Reactions: lawyersum

    c.t.tc

    Distinguished Member
  • Jun 10, 2025
    66
    58
    Up there with the toughest due to the way the time limit is structured - definitely check out their hub!


    The unlimited prep was good - I employed @Abbie Whitlock's method of recording before, and I definitely felt I gave stronger answers as a result.
    I can't seem to find where the recording method was posted - is there any way you could repost it please? I would be super grateful!
     

    johnsmith

    Legendary Member
    Oct 2, 2025
    133
    147
    Hey!

    Sure, happy to share how I approached the VI!

    In general for video interviews, it's really important to make sure that you are fully answering the question and that any examples that you use actually fit with the question. I used to have a tendency to want to use my strongest example and try and fit it to the question, however, the graduate recruitment team can usually tell and it'll look better to use an example that fits best (even if it is a less 'substantive' experience)

    Another main thing I did was practice - it can be very weird to talk to a computer screen, so it really helped me to have a go at answering the most common interview questions in the mirror (even if it felt a little silly!). I had a tendency to ramble in my video interviews, so knowing roughly how long it would take me to cover my main topics was really helpful.

    Make sure you also utilise your prep time, as this is really useful to have a clear idea of what you are going to say before you start recording - Reed Smith actually recommend you use the prep time instead of jumping straight into the questions! I would avoid writing a script as this can sound robotic and could reflect badly on your overall performance, but I stuck a post-it note with all the key points I wanted to discuss and used that when practising (and in the recording).

    There's a video in the TCLA Law Firm Directory that I watched before my VI that I found was super helpful - I'll link it here. I'd definitely give that a watch, as Rik gives some great advice on what they are looking for and how to approach each aspect of the assessment.

    Overall, just answer truthfully and be yourself. I think there's a tendency to think you have to come across as super composed and scripted for a video interview, but this isn't necessarily how you would behave in an actual interview. Take a moment to relax before recording, and try and come across as approachable and friendly - show them your personality and what your strengths are!

    I hope that assists :)
    @c.t.tc this was what I meant! 👌
     

    Abbie Whitlock

    Administrator
    Staff member
    Gold Member
    Premium Member
    Sep 11, 2025
    303
    253
    That would be great @Abbie Whitlock. Thank you so muchhh!!!!!!
    Of course, no problem at all!!

    Since client emails are such a common format in written exercises, it's definitely worth getting comfortable with how to approach them! A few things that I kept in mind when preparing:

    Understand the Purpose and Audience

    Before you start writing, clarify who you are writing to (e.g. a client, supervisor, or a colleague) and what information they need from you. The tone, level of formality, and structure will vary depending on whether it's an internal email or an email to an external client.

    For example, if you are emailing a client, you want to ensure that they are able to understand any legal principles that you are outlining in your email. As such, it's important to make sure you write it in layman's terms and don't just recite the information given in the materials. However, if you are emailing a supervisor, I would focus on highlighting the most important pieces of information as you are effectively trying to save them time in going through the materials themselves. I would always aim to write in a professional way, and frame it like you would an actual email - such as a subject line and a closing sentence.

    Use a Clear and Logical Structure

    The main thing that I changed when approaching written exercises was making sure that I had a clear and logical structure. A good client email should be easy to follow. A simple structure could look like:

    1. Opening: A brief, polite greeting and context for why you're writing (and what you'll be discussing in the email). If you're emailing a supervisor, it might be useful to include a short summary of your findings at the top (i.e. an early conclusion), and then go into more detail below.
    2. Main Body: Summarise the key points or advice clearly and concisely, using short paragraphs. It might be appropriate to use headings and subtitles, especially if there is a lot of information. The goal is to make sure that the client can follow along, and that it isn't just a massive wall of text that is difficult to read.
    3. Closing: End with next steps, an offer of assistance, or a polite sign-off (e.g. "Please let me know if you'd like to discuss further"). These elements distinguish an email exercise from a general report or memo, and shows that you are following the brief exactly! If you are emailing a supervisor, I would try to show some proactivity in the closing parts - such as offering to write a first draft of a document or client email.

    Keep your tone professional and approachable

    I would aim for clear, confident language without being overly formal (but still professional). This can be tricky, but phrases such as "I'd recommend..." or "It may be helpful..." strike a nice balance. Avoid overly technical language or long-winded phrasing - simplicity often conveys professionalism! As stated above, I would definitely avoid legal jargon if you are writing to a client, unless you are certain that a client would understand it.

    Also remember that tone can shift slightly depending on the client's relationship with the firm. If you are told this information, a longstanding client might suit a warmer tone, whilst a first-time contact may call for a more formal approach. However, if in doubt, I would always go for a more formal approach - especially in a professional context!

    Be precise and client-focused

    Remember the purpose for why you are actually writing to the client, and tailor your response to the client's actual issue. I would avoid copying large chunks of background information from the brief (as the client will already have this information!) - instead, demonstrate understanding of their issue by reframing the key points in your own words and applying them directly to the client's situation. Make sure to keep your advice practical - clients care more about what they should do next than about the legal theory behind it. You might find it useful to use signposting phrases such as "In summary..." or "Based on the information provided..." to make your reasoning easy to follow. If there are uncertainties, I would make sure to address them but be reassuring - e.g. "Further details would be needed to confirm this position, but at this stage...".

    Check for clarity and tone at the end

    Before your time runs out, take a moment to review your email. I always found it helpful to read it aloud (if possible) or follow along with my finger - this helps you catch sentences that are too long, unclear, or sound abrupt. Look for opportunities to simplify, and if a sentence takes more than one breath to read, it's probably too long! Make sure your sign-off fits the context (things such as "Kind regards" or "Best wishes" usually work best). The graduate recruitment team / assessors will be looking for professionalism in formatting and presentation - consistent spacing, clear paragraphing, and correct spelling and grammar will all make a strong impression.

    As a practical tip to practice: You could start by taking short case studies and draft sample emails that summarise your advice in 200-300 words. This helps you get used to organising your thoughts quickly and writing in a professional, accessible way.

    I hope that helps!
     

    jaisrihere

    Star Member
    Oct 4, 2025
    25
    14
    Hey!

    Try not to worry too much - three days for a single application isn't unusual at all! A good-quality application can take quite a bit of time, especially if you're tailoring your answers and revising them to ensure their clear and consistent.

    It's actually a really great sign that you're putting in the effort - most strong applications aren't done in one sitting. Over time, you'll probably get faster as you reuse parts of past applications and refine your approach / writing technique.

    If you're feeling exhausted (and it definitely is a tiring process!), try breaking the process into smaller stages (research, drafting, proofreading) and spread them over a few days. This helps make the application process feel more manageable.

    You're definitely not doing it "wrong" - it just takes practice to find your own rhythm :)
    Thanks a lot for the insights Abbie 🙂♥️
     
    • 🤝
    Reactions: Abbie Whitlock

    Amgrad

    Distinguished Member
    Oct 2, 2025
    55
    82
    Hi!!

    I just practiced with AI Video Interview Coach at TCLA, but never got 5/5 in any aspects, mostly got 2 or 3, and their feedback is too general and wondering if there is an example of videos when someone got 5/5.

    I am so struggling due to fillers and articulation which always reduce my points.

    I am wondering about the human assessment by the grad rec, do they care about them as well or prefer innate speech and authenticity than scripted and memorised answers?
     

    About Us

    The Corporate Law Academy (TCLA) was founded in 2018 because we wanted to improve the legal journey. We wanted more transparency and better training. We wanted to form a community of aspiring lawyers who care about becoming the best version of themselves.

    Newsletter

    Discover the most relevant business news, access our law firm analysis, and receive our best advice for aspiring lawyers.