I don't think so...tbh the firm is pretty gatekeeped i literally don't know how to tailor my app...they don't attend any events either lol
I don't think so...tbh the firm is pretty gatekeeped i literally don't know how to tailor my app...they don't attend any events either lol
I did my VI on Wednesday and haven’t heard back yet. I can’t see that anyone in the forum has heard back yetHas anyone heard from White & Case post-VI (For VIs completed on Thursday)?
DLA Piper said they’re non-rolling at their open day however I got an email just now saying that I had passed the test benchmark and that applications are reviewed on a rolling basis??
They’ll be reviewing our applications and sending out invites for phone interviews.Do you know what the next stage is?
Did they also review applications before sending the WG?They’ll be reviewing our applications and sending out invites for phone interviews.
Sorry to hear. When did you apply if you don't mind me asking? And you reckon you did well in the vid interviews?Simmons PFOexcelled in numerical and verbal and got 7,9,4 in success areas
Ah I'm sorry - I'm expecting mine imminently - when did you do your test?Simmons PFOexcelled in numerical and verbal and got 7,9,4 in success areas
When I got the email including the test link I was told I had “successfully advanced to the next stage” so I’d assume soDid they also review applications before sending the WG?
Thanks so much!Hello!
You're absolutely right that there's some overlap between the cover letter and the two subsequent questions - it can feel a bit repetitive at first glance! The trick is to think of the cover letter as the big picture narrative that ties everything together, while the other two questions let you to into depth on specific points.
One way to approach it could be:
I would think of the cover letter as the overview that shows your entire profile as a candidate, and the two follow-up questions as supporting sections that provide more evidence and reasoning behind the themes you have introduced. Some overlap is fine (and you will want to look consistent across your application), but I would avoid copy-pasting sentences between sections.
- Cover Letter: Treat this as your overall introduction and pitch. I would summarise who you are, your motivation for law in broad terms, and why Orrick stands out to you - but keep it concise and integrated between each section. You don't need to unpack every detail here, just enough to create a coherent, personal story and show enthusiasm!
- "Why commercial law?" question: Use this to explore your motivations in more detail - you could refer to specific experiences, influences, or reflections that made you decide to pursue a career in commercial law. This is a chance to go deeper into the why, not just the what.
- "Why Orrick" question: This is an opportunity to show real research and insight into the firm. Focus on showing your interest in the firm, and what genuinely differentiates Orrick - it's clients, international reach, innovation, culture, training structure, etc. Tie in your previous experiences and skill set to why this makes you a good fit for the firm, and how it's unique features make it the right place for you to train.
I hope that helps!![]()
Hey, I did it on 27/10Ah I'm sorry - I'm expecting mine imminently - when did you do your test?
Hey, I applied on the 25th I’m pretty sure, and I think my answers were good but I perhaps came across too nervous.Sorry to hear. When did you apply if you don't mind me asking? And you reckon you did well in the vid interviews?
Simmons PFOexcelled in numerical and verbal and got 7,9,4 in success areas