Sorry to hear. When did you apply if you don't mind me asking? And you reckon you did well in the vid interviews?Simmons PFOexcelled in numerical and verbal and got 7,9,4 in success areas
Sorry to hear. When did you apply if you don't mind me asking? And you reckon you did well in the vid interviews?Simmons PFOexcelled in numerical and verbal and got 7,9,4 in success areas
Ah I'm sorry - I'm expecting mine imminently - when did you do your test?Simmons PFOexcelled in numerical and verbal and got 7,9,4 in success areas
When I got the email including the test link I was told I had “successfully advanced to the next stage” so I’d assume soDid they also review applications before sending the WG?
Thanks so much!Hello!
You're absolutely right that there's some overlap between the cover letter and the two subsequent questions - it can feel a bit repetitive at first glance! The trick is to think of the cover letter as the big picture narrative that ties everything together, while the other two questions let you to into depth on specific points.
One way to approach it could be:
I would think of the cover letter as the overview that shows your entire profile as a candidate, and the two follow-up questions as supporting sections that provide more evidence and reasoning behind the themes you have introduced. Some overlap is fine (and you will want to look consistent across your application), but I would avoid copy-pasting sentences between sections.
- Cover Letter: Treat this as your overall introduction and pitch. I would summarise who you are, your motivation for law in broad terms, and why Orrick stands out to you - but keep it concise and integrated between each section. You don't need to unpack every detail here, just enough to create a coherent, personal story and show enthusiasm!
 - "Why commercial law?" question: Use this to explore your motivations in more detail - you could refer to specific experiences, influences, or reflections that made you decide to pursue a career in commercial law. This is a chance to go deeper into the why, not just the what.
 - "Why Orrick" question: This is an opportunity to show real research and insight into the firm. Focus on showing your interest in the firm, and what genuinely differentiates Orrick - it's clients, international reach, innovation, culture, training structure, etc. Tie in your previous experiences and skill set to why this makes you a good fit for the firm, and how it's unique features make it the right place for you to train.
 
I hope that helps!![]()
Hey, I did it on 27/10Ah I'm sorry - I'm expecting mine imminently - when did you do your test?
Hey, I applied on the 25th I’m pretty sure, and I think my answers were good but I perhaps came across too nervous.Sorry to hear. When did you apply if you don't mind me asking? And you reckon you did well in the vid interviews?
Simmons PFOexcelled in numerical and verbal and got 7,9,4 in success areas
Thank you! It was for London, best of luck - might be a good sign!Sorry to hear this for you! 😔 was this for London or Bristol? I did mine 24th and not heard back yet!
any advice with moving VS - not because you are doing another one, but because of difficulty getting leave from your current role?
I did mine a few weeks ago so I don't fully remember but I believe there was one written question and two video interview questions. There unlimited prep time for everything. I believe there's one motivational question and the second one is possibly a competency question.Hi, for Pinsent Masons VI how many there are and what they are like? Just wanted to see how much time I should allocate. Also any other questions that require more time / prep like written responses? Thanks!
I'd just speak to grad rec on the phone. Human side of everyone comes across better that way 😀any advice with moving VS - not because you are doing another one, but because of difficulty getting leave from your current role?