This isn’t true, they look at your application holistically. It even says at the end of the video that your responses will now be manually reviewed.It’s automatic. And they don’t read your Application unless you pass.
This isn’t true, they look at your application holistically. It even says at the end of the video that your responses will now be manually reviewed.It’s automatic. And they don’t read your Application unless you pass.
"Good morning,
Thank you for your interest in A&O Shearman.
We would like to inform you that the Summer Vacation Scheme is open exclusively to penultimate-year university students. As you have already graduated, your application does not meet the eligibility criteria for this programme.
However, we are pleased to let you know that we have transferred your application to the appropriate Direct Training Contract route."😇 Get confused for the eligibility but still apply to VS... At least knowing that they are looking on apps now...
15th Sept submitted, 22th done the testWhen did u submit ur app
Hello!Is it worth applying to A&O with an overall 2.2 (russell group)? I have mitigating circumstances but I do not want to raise my expectations without understanding how the firm assesses applications. I have progressed with several US firms and a few UK firms (including Freshfields, possibly because I work there). This is my first time applying to A&O so I am unsure whether the firm takes a fully holistic approach and if my experience can offset weaker grades. Any advice will be much appreciated!
Hi!is it deep if I apply to Covington despite not having done any of their previous schemes or having met them? I really want to apply, I feel like I have done so much research on the firm and could give really solid answers but I just don't know if it is worth it if I haven't interacted with them and the chances are that many applicants probably have? Having a similar problem with hogan lovells :/
Hi @Andrei Radu @Amma Usman,
I’m re-applying to Gibson Dunn this cycle after reaching the AC last year and would really appreciate your advice.
I’ve re-written my “why commercial law” paragraph and fully refreshed my first “why Gibson Dunn” paragraph.
My question is about my two other reasons for wanting to join the firm: the disputes/transactions balance, and the training philosophy. My reasoning on those hasn’t changed — so is it acceptable to keep those broadly the same this year, or is that still too risky even if I lightly rephrase?
Separately, my final “why me” paragraph is currently focused on my university research achievement and my society leadership roles (I graduated two years ago). Should I keep the research award and add a recent achievement to show progression — or would you replace it entirely?
Would really appreciate your thoughts. I thought last year’s application was strong and I’d like to keep elements of it this year if I can.
Long dashes existed long before ChatGPT 😭Just make sure you don't use Chat GPT when writing app and these long dashes as you'll get rejected immediately![]()
They look at your application answers after taking the test. You don't get passed to the next stage yet just because you passed the test. You would have to pass their internal benchmark and then they review it in line with what you have said in your application as well. Everyone gets the test invite. I attended a program where Grad rec spoke to us. They said they send out their invites manually, that's why it doesn't come automatically, but it doesn't mean they read all apps before sending out the VI invite. It's just like Gibson Dunn and HSF, you get the tests but your application won't be reviewed unless you pass their internal benchmark. They also said they are rolling but they won't progress people to written exercise until after the deadline. Why exactly would I mislead anyone on here? The point of automatic tests are to help them filter applications out.This isn’t true, they look at your application holistically. It even says at the end of the video that your responses will now be manually reviewed.