• Get Everything You Need to Secure a Training Contract
    Now half the price. Join TCLA Premium for £30/month and get step-by-step application support, daily commercial awareness practice, and 700+ successful examples of past applications and interview experiences. Plus so much more.
    Join Premium →
  • Office Hours with BCLP (Live Q&A)
    17 December 2025 5:30 pm – 6:30 pm (UK) Hosted on TCLA TV
    Join Isabel Elsey, Legal Recruitment Manager at BCLP, for a live Q&A session. Get details on secondments, innovation, growth areas, and everything else you’ve wanted to ask about life at BCLP!

    📺 View Event →

TCLA Vacation Scheme Applications Discussion Thread 2025-26

yk1906

Legendary Member
Aug 26, 2024
450
473
Skadden PFO! My Top 1 Firm is gone, for me it hurts more than P,W or CC I keep following skadden on LinkedIn and now need to be unfollowed, bye my heart breaker 💔

My 4th rejection of VS/TC app after P,W, CC, and Gowling!!! 4 NOs among 18 apps, am I screwed?

This is so randooom why do firms keep me on wait-list while some progressed me without me to expect as I didn't go to their open day or events and not placed them on my dream firms

I guess I need to delete my ranked/list of my top firms :'( just shot more apps
I’m so sorry! :( I am doing the numbers game this year just to check where I stand more globally… So if you have enough time, it might be a good approach
 
  • 🤝
Reactions: Amgrad

johnsmith

Legendary Member
  • Oct 2, 2025
    315
    428
    Skadden PFO! My Top 1 Firm is gone, for me it hurts more than P,W or CC I keep following skadden on LinkedIn and now need to be unfollowed, bye my heart breaker 💔

    My 4th rejection of VS/TC app after P,W, CC, and Gowling!!! 4 NOs among 18 apps, am I screwed?

    This is so randooom why do firms keep me on wait-list while some progressed me without me to expect as I didn't go to their open day or events and not placed them on my dream firms

    I guess I need to delete my ranked/list of my top firms :'( just shot more apps
    It’s ok I’ve had like 15 🤣 but honestly you'll still find a great home to train at and you can always move later once qualified.

    Edit: it's actually 17!
     
    Last edited:

    BobThebIlly

    Legendary Member
    Premium Member
    Dec 6, 2024
    130
    203
    Guys can anyone PLEASE shed some light on what to expect for Weils SJT and VI

    Is the SJT similar to lathams? How many VI qs are there and are the questions mostly motivational/competence rather than commercial?

    I’ve never sat a VI before so I’m bricking it and am clinging onto this small glimmer of hope with dear life
     
    • Like
    Reactions: yk1906

    yk1906

    Legendary Member
    Aug 26, 2024
    450
    473
    Guys can anyone PLEASE shed some light on what to expect for Weils SJT and VI

    Is the SJT similar to lathams? How many VI qs are there and are the questions mostly motivational/competence rather than commercial?

    I’ve never sat a VI before so I’m bricking it and am clinging onto this small glimmer of hope with dear life
    I haven’t done it yet (received an invite yesterday), BUT I do believe VIs are going to be heavily motivational, due to lack of such questions in the application. Also, I am going to prep “why me?”
     

    Amgrad

    Legendary Member
    Oct 2, 2025
    280
    291
    It’s ok I’ve had like 15 🤣 but honestly you'll still find a great home to train at and you can always move later once qualified.
    I was hoping like getting a one AC before Xmas, but it seems impossible now 😮‍💨. I am aiming to apply 24 firms by end of this month and got an AC mid of Jan. Otherwise, will apply more from 36 to 54 if don't get an AC before Ramadan 😭
     

    Amgrad

    Legendary Member
    Oct 2, 2025
    280
    291
    Good morning all,

    I take a glance at the forum here and there nowadays and it’s so nice to see how supportive everyone’s being!

    Time for my quarterly (or monthly??!) update:

    PFOs so far:

    Reed Smith post app
    Taylor Wessing post SJT
    • HSF Kramer even after passing SJT
    Skadden post app (today) 😭
    NRF post VI but I’ve reapplied for summer lmao
    • Paul, Weiss post app
    Hogan Lovells post 1st test
    • Covington post app
    Willkie post VI
    Bird & Bird post VI
    CMS post WG
    • WFW post app

    Waiting to hear back from:
    Clyde & Co VI (pleaseeee give me an AC 😭😭😭)
    • Goodwin post app
    Cooley post app
    • Mishcon post chat interview
    Withers post SJT (assuming PFO)
    • Hill Dickinson post app
    Stephenson Harwood post app
    Travers Smith post app
    NRF post Arctic Shores (recycled my score lmao please gimme another VI)
    Ropes & Gray post app
    • Farrer & Co post app (got to 1st stage interview for DTC last year, hopefully I progress)
    HFW post app

    Will do Womble Bond Dickinson and other DTC apps from next month… 😭😭 planning my wedding is a delight compared to this and that’s saying something !!!
    Hey I hope my advice on DM for Clyde VI would get you to AC. Good luck!!! I'm planning to apply 6 of your submitted apps by end of Jan!
     
    • Like
    • 🏆
    Reactions: nbjani and SamiyaJ

    elle woods

    Legendary Member
  • Dec 4, 2025
    274
    470
    Skadden PFO! My Top 1 Firm is gone, for me it hurts more than P,W or CC I keep following skadden on LinkedIn and now need to be unfollowed, bye my heart breaker 💔

    My 4th rejection of VS/TC app after P,W, CC, and Gowling!!! 4 NOs among 18 apps, am I screwed?

    This is so randooom why do firms keep me on wait-list while some progressed me without me to expect as I didn't go to their open day or events and not placed them on my dream firms

    I guess I need to delete my ranked/list of my top firms :'( just shot more apps
    I don’t think you’re screwed!! 4 is actually not bad at all in the grand scheme of things, usually the ratio out of 15ish apps (according to my friend and experience) is typically you might progress to next stages on only half of them if you’re lucky (ofc it depends on lots of factors too tho like the competitiveness of the firms you’re applying to etc)

    I’ve applied to 16 I think and have gotten PFOs or will definitely be getting a PFO (ghosted after first test) by like 7 - and others are still pending, but I know the likelihood is that there will be some PFOs in the rest too.

    So don’t worry! - best of luck!
     
    Last edited:

    adh3

    Active Member
    Premium Member
    Oct 14, 2025
    10
    31
    Yeah, I understood this in the end.

    I think what ruffled my feathers was actually the other person implying tailoring apps doesn't matter if you have the right credentials. I think the correlation between the posts probably got the better of me there.
    OK, I can see that you're referring to me. But, that's not really the point I was trying to make.

    What I was trying to say, is that tailoring your answers (and getting them reviewed) will only take you so far. There are other aspects of your application which are equally, if not more, important. And, from my observations, applicants who are stronger all-rounders tend to get further despite obvious flaws in their application answers.

    If I could show you what my friend wrote without identifying myself, I would. For a bit more context, his applications simply mentioned PE being a firm's strength, and then he copy/pasted an explanation about why he (given his experience) would thrive at that firm.

    The most important takeaway here (for me) was that the age-old advice from graduate recruitment, that your answer must be "unique" (in the sense of not being applicable to another firm), is clearly untrue by looking at his answers. For each of them, you could have plugged in the name of another small-intake US firm specialising in PE and it would have been equally as valid.
     
    • 🤝
    Reactions: BealMcAlly

    BealMcAlly

    Esteemed Member
    Gold Member
    Premium Member
    Feb 3, 2025
    98
    90
    OK, I can see that you're referring to me. But, that's not really the point I was trying to make.

    What I was trying to say, is that tailoring your answers (and getting them reviewed) will only take you so far. There are other aspects of your application which are equally, if not more, important. And, from my observations, applicants who are stronger all-rounders tend to get further despite obvious flaws in their application answers.

    If I could show you what my friend wrote without identifying myself, I would. For a bit more context, his applications simply mentioned PE being a firm's strength, and then he copy/pasted an explanation about why he (given his experience) would thrive at that firm.

    The most important takeaway here (for me) was that the age-old advice from graduate recruitment, that your answer must be "unique" (in the sense of not being applicable to another firm), is clearly untrue by looking at his answers. For each of them, you could have plugged in the name of another small-intake US firm specialising in PE and it would have been equally as valid.
    Thank you for clarifying.


    I think what you said here also shows what sorts of firms care about what. US firms are known to care about credentials a lot, hence their really high entry requirements to begin with. Maybe your friend just looked really good on paper that they did not care. Great for your friend, sucks for everyone else trying really hard though.
     
    • Like
    Reactions: adh3

    About Us

    The Corporate Law Academy (TCLA) was founded in 2018 because we wanted to improve the legal journey. We wanted more transparency and better training. We wanted to form a community of aspiring lawyers who care about becoming the best version of themselves.

    Get Our 2026 Vacation Scheme Guide

    Nail your vacation scheme applications this year with our latest guide, with sample answers to law firm questions.