I’m about to be one of them 😂😂😂You’re gna have a stampede of people rushing to msg you for “insights” into Goodwin’s VI now like:
![]()
That is actually really reassuring, I do not like VIs at all! If you don't mind me asking, are there any commercial questions? I am prepping those just in case. Thanks in advance!the goodwin VI is really not that bad tbh. it's fairly standard motivational/competency questions you should prep anyway
Did you apply for the winter one or spring?White & Case AC!
Also, Linklaters said they filled places for the winter scheme but offered an AC for the spring scheme instead.
Other firms with Watson Glaser/Critical Thinking Test (Apps still open):does anyone have a list of firms that dont use amberjack? or the Taylor wessing/eversheds type test? im getting tired of these... I almost miss the Watson Glaser.
OC's test was designed to cook aspiring solicitors full of energy and dreams.Other firms with Watson Glaser/Critical Thinking Test (Apps still open):
Milbank
Cooley
Cleary Gottlieb
Addleshaw Goddard
I've made a list for Amberjack before on this thread, worth check it out.
Other firms use Cappfin and SHL (Ashurst, Osborne Clarke, etc). The rest are quite direct either with written exercise or interview.
White & Case VI was absolutely criminal. I prepped so well and had no idea that the prep time was like 15 seconds lol, it completely threw me off. I spent like half of the response time for one of the questions just reading the question because I didn't even get a chance to fully register it lol“Insights” are a cover up for asking for the vi questions lowkey but I could be wrong.
I’ve given insights and been fully ignored no thank you or anything as it was not the questions themselves.
Like 9 times out of 10 if the application does not have any motivational questions obviously the vi will.
Most of these vi’s are the same just worded differently. Only vi I think is ludicrous is bakers. As well as W&C and Kirkland for 15 secs prep. Also Reed smith for asking 3 sub questions in 1 question.
That being said I don’t mind a cheeky trade!
I dont understand why firms dont make whether they are rolling or not clear enough...
I’d say many do make it clear it’s just that they don’t follow their own process and it makes it super confusing. Stating your rolling then then waiting until after the deadline or the opposite.I dont understand why firms dont make whether they are rolling or not clear enough...
I want to just add on say that Milbank's WG is a stage 2 assessment.Other firms with Watson Glaser/Critical Thinking Test (Apps still open):
Milbank
Cooley
Cleary Gottlieb
Addleshaw Goddard
I've made a list for Amberjack before on this thread, worth check it out.
Other firms use Cappfin and SHL (Ashurst, Osborne Clarke, etc). The rest are quite direct either with written exercise or interview.
Most time-generous US law firm VI:White & Case VI was absolutely criminal. I prepped so well and had no idea that the prep time was like 15 seconds lol, it completely threw me off. I spent like half of the response time for one of the questions just reading the question because I didn't even get a chance to fully register it lol
Was definitely the hardest one I have sat so far! That stupid interactive test needs to be put in the binOC's test was designed to cook aspiring solicitors full of energy and dreams.
Gives them more time to make shitty, poorly timed tiktoksThat’d be extra work for grad rec and they prefer to keep things rly ambiguous. They probs read these forums and see our daily crash-outs over whether they’re rolling or non-rolling and be like:
![]()