Thank you, needed this small win rnI got substantially lower than that and I progressed. Great job.
I got 6674 and high applied verbal.
Thank you, needed this small win rnI got substantially lower than that and I progressed. Great job.
I got 6674 and high applied verbal.
Just do this instead I’m sure the partners would be happy to join in too to lighten the mood:Hi guys, have an odd questions. Where do you guys usually place your hands in an interview? Google says on the table but I feel like that would make me look like a d***head![]()
will try this and let yall know if they join in or notJust do this instead I’m sure the partners would be happy to join in too to lighten the mood:
![]()
![]()
Above my head like a suspect.Hi guys, have an odd questions. Where do you guys usually place your hands in an interview? Google says on the table but I feel like that would make me look like a d***head![]()
No…is the bakers OA automatic? i applied summer and havent heard back since
And that’s on TCLA LLP #CommunityI feel like this is the most entertaining this thread has ever been and oddly enough it makes it more motivating lol
![]()
i lvoe mark leewill try this and let yall know if they join in or not
I usually mix the chronological approach with a PEEL structure. I have a series of events that led me into commercial law. It’s easier for me that way!For the interview answer to 'why commercial law', do you guys tend to take a chronological approach or a PEEL structure?
same. me too.i lvoe mark lee
hey!! how long before the ac did you get the invite?I went to a Latham AC recently - most people were there for spring but there were 1 or 2 people being assessed for summer
@Blueberry26 I think for these sort of questions, it's best to adopt a PEEL approach, so that you can make your initial point, explain your reasoning behind it, and try to highlight where that explanation comes from e.g. studies, experiences, extracurriculars etc. Chronological approaches however tend to perform better in more generic questions, which don't necessarily aim to assess something such as "tell me a little bit about you" - for these, you want to give them a little wrap up of your journey so far.For the interview answer to 'why commercial law', do you guys tend to take a chronological approach or a PEEL structure?
A related question, but I really struggle with “tell us a bit more about yourself questions. Namely because I do not know what they’re trying to assess (a specific skill) so in the past I’ve attempted to say “I am a person that excels in X skill and Y skill” but I’m wondering how best to approach those kinda questions?@Blueberry26 I think for these sort of questions, it's best to adopt a PEEL approach, so that you can make your initial point, explain your reasoning behind it, and try to highlight where that explanation comes from e.g. studies, experiences, extracurriculars etc. Chronological approaches however tend to perform better in more generic questions, which don't necessarily aim to assess something such as "tell me a little bit about you" - for these, you want to give them a little wrap up of your journey so far.