Congrats! Do you mind me asking when you received a response please? And whether this is for the spring or summer as I am still waiting for a response for spring![]()
In the same boat, no response for 90! days lol
Congrats! Do you mind me asking when you received a response please? And whether this is for the spring or summer as I am still waiting for a response for spring![]()
I think what you're saying has merit, but just to input it's also blind luck to an extent. For example, I don't think there is necessarily rhyme or reason to most SJTs for example (every firm will prioritise values, and the sliding scales really make no practical sense most of the time) other than being a tool to get rid of a % of applicants at random, knowing that even if they get rid of loads of competent candidates they will still statistically have more than enough left in the pool.My unprovable conspiracy theory is there is a lot of unconscious bias and prejudice in recruitment till this day. An overwhelming majority of people who progress with US/MC/SC firms come from a very particular demographic that makes up such a tiny proportion of the population.
If these firms said they will only hire XYZ type of candidates it would result in discrimination suits cos its breaching protected characteristics. Like having an ethnic name, being from a certain area or going to a ‘low-ranking uni’, if firms explicitly said we we don’t want this = bad for PR.
Oddly enough, two of the firms I have been able to progress with didn’t seem to use any contextual recruitment tools (or at least I can’t remember if I entered the data). Other firms which seem to do a lot of parading around social mobility had outright rejected me (same exact credentials on paper).
So my idea is firms avoid offering feedback cos they’d end up digging their own holes admitting they rejected candidates for arbitrary and unfair reasons. Surely being transparent about what it is you’re after from candidates (e.g., Cleary) will rly make this process much more transparent.
From what I remember when applying to the placement you also apply to the DTC ? would need to be confirmed thoughFor Shoosmiths, can you apply to both the direct TC and the discover placement in the same cycle? Will that negatively affect my chances?
I am soo sorry you have noticed that! That is terrible and a firm should not penalise a candidate for having MC.Can someone
i think i agree with all of what you said actually! i've realised i'm being progressed less when i explain my MC vs when i just let my low 2.1 be a low 2.1.
I think they say when you apply for the discover placement they are already considering you for a TC so to just submit one app, and the placement can result in an AC for the TC but not sure if that is helpful!For Shoosmiths, can you apply to both the direct TC and the discover placement in the same cycle? Will that negatively affect my chances?
Do you think that means, if I get rejected from the placement, I can still make an application to the direct tc?From what I remember when applying to the placement you also apply to the DTC ? would need to be confirmed though
Ah thanks. I was just wondering, if I don’t get the placement, can I still make an application for the direct TC?I think they say when you apply for the discover placement they are already considering you for a TC so to just submit one app, and the placement can result in an AC for the TC but not sure if that is helpful!
In my experience i always perform worse in virtual ones compared to in-person ones. I think having a real person in front of you instead of it being done on Teams makes a big difference, at least for me.for people who have experience with virtual ACs, how was your experience compared to an in-person AC?
Ah thanks. I was just wondering, if I don’t get the placement, can I still make an application for the direct TC?
I don't think so, they say you only need to make one application and generally firms don't let you apply to both in one cycleAh thanks. I was just wondering, if I don’t get the placement, can I still make an application for the direct TC?
for people who have experience with virtual ACs, how was your experience compared to an in-person AC?
I second this. in person is 10x better. You can make more of an impression. It feels authentic rather than them ticking of questions. You can connect with other candidates in the process which is nice. You also get food lolIn my experience i always perform worse in virtual ones compared to in-person ones. I think having a real person in front of you instead of it being done on Teams makes a big difference, at least for me.