If anyone wants to chat about the OC AC pls message me xx #nervous x
Congratulations 🎉 please could you confirm if you also received the Clyde survey email that went out today?Osborne Clarke virtual AC and Clyde & Co Virtual AC invite 2 minutes apart!!!!!!
Congrats!! when did you complete the VI for Clyde & Co?Osborne Clarke virtual AC and Clyde & Co Virtual AC invite 2 minutes apart!!!!!!
Hey I have the virtual ac too but havent got the email, did u book a time for monday? all ive got is a login I dont have the password toHas anyone just had an email from OC changing the task from a case study to a ‘commercial interview’? Eeekkk
Haven’t received a login yet but I booked mine for the 5th!Hey I have the virtual ac too but havent got the email, did u book a time for monday? all ive got is a login I dont have the password to
Do you know if they’re sending acs in batches? I also applied to spring 😓Thank you! It's London Spring Vac Scheme
Absolutely not imo. They are still reviewing applications, there is bound to be more than one round of ACs. Probably they sent the email not to worry people seeing that others were getting ACs.looks like Clyde and co pfo then if people are getting ac? Seems a bit contradictory to the aforementioned email
DWF GAMIFIED ASSESSMENT:Yes, but invited to the dwf “gamified” assessment but no clue how to tackle it.
Hopefully they’re still going through the apps! I’ll let you know if I ever hear back hahahsame I fully give up with AG, fourth time applying as well
Hi!Does anybody have any advice for how to prepare for a case study at an interview? It’s my first time doing one at an AC and I’m really unsure of what sort of things I should know and what to expect! Any advice would be appreciated![]()
Hi!
Huge congratulations on receiving the AC invite for Reed Smith!!
Whilst I can't share any specifics, I'm happy to share some general tips for case studies, motivational interviews, and proof reading exercises! Across all of the exercises, I would say that structure and clarity are really key. The assessors are usually less focused on you having the "perfect" answer and more on how you approach the task, prioritise issues, and explain your reasoning as you go along.
For the case study, I would absolutely make good use of the preparation time. What helped me was to read through all of the documents first to get a sense of the overall scenario, and then go back over it to familiarise myself with the finer details. If there is anything that is unclear or confusing, I would try to work it out during the prep time so that, if it comes up in the interview discussion, you are able to explain your understanding confidently (or at least explain your thought process in working it out if you are still not 100% sure!). One piece of advice that my mentor gave me that I found really helpful was to become comfortable with what contracts actually look like in practice - i.e. understanding common clauses, what they mean, and the effect they can have (and whether they are favourable / less favourable to your client). I would also try not to overcomplicate it - this is something I really struggled with at first, but if the answer feels like it is relatively straightforward, I would go with your gut! If the interviewers / assessors require more information, they might be able to ask follow-up questions that you can then address.
For the motivational interview, I would make sure that you have researched the firm (which I'm sure you have!) and can clearly articulate why Reed Smith specifically. Think about how your experiences and interests align with the firm's distinctive features (e.g. its sector focus or initiatives like the Professional SQE Placement Year). For example, I linked my previous vacation scheme experience at a firm with shipping expertise to Reed Smith's expertise in the area, as I could explain how my interest in the area had developed and why Reed Smith's practice stood out to me (compared to the other firm). As with any interview, it also helps to prepare a few thoughtful questions to ask at the end - although if any questions naturally arise due to things discussed in the interview, I'd always encourage you to ask those! Importantly (and I know this is the most annoying advice ever), be yourself! They're assessing your fit to the firm as much as motivation and experience, so I'd try to be friendly and match the atmosphere in the room as this really does go a long way.
For the proofreading exercise, I would encourage you to work slowly and methodically. One practical tip that I found helpful was to use your finger to guide yourself through the text and make note of anything that stands out. While I didn't personally do a proofreading exercise at my Reed Smith AC, I have done similar ones elsewhere and always looked for things such as defined terms (and whether they're capitalised consistently), spelling / grammar, and whether dates and deadlines match throughout the document. These are things that you might not necessarily think to check in a proofreading exercise, but are always important in the legal context!
Above all - stay calm, be structured, and try to explain your thinking clearly wherever you can. It sounds silly to say, but I did really enjoy my Reed Smith AC and I felt that the partners and graduate recruitment team wanted me to do well, rather than trying to catch me out.
I'm sure that you will smash it, and best of luck!![]()
Hey!Hi, does anyone have any insight as to whether or not Direct TC ACs differ from Vac Scheme ACs? Would it be more difficult/rigorous or the same?