• TCLA Premium: Now half price (£30/month). Applications, interviews, commercial awareness + 700+ examples.
    Join →

TCLA Vacation Scheme Applications Discussion Thread 2026-27

Please excuse the copy-and-paste (last year's vac scheme thread is now closed) but I have a follow-up question to this:

I am fortunate to have been offered a training contract and have 4 weeks to respond with my decision. However, in 5 weeks' time, I have an interview for a vacation scheme with a firm that I feel would be a better fit, and the vacation scheme wouldn't start until a few weeks after that. So this firm's training contract offers could be about 3 months away. So I don't feel that asking for such a long extension to my TC decision deadline is viable.

I understand it is pretty common to renege on training contract acceptances - if I were to be offered the vacation scheme and it led to a TC at the other firm, in this case, I would not have received any money from the initial firm, and I wouldn't have strung them along for that long.

My question is about the upcoming vacation scheme interview. When they ask, how did your vacation scheme at firm X go? Naturally, it's good to say it went well and led to me being offered a TC from that firm. Makes you look like a competitive candidate. But what do you say when they ask how you plan to respond to the offer? Saying I've accepted it, but I will breach the contract and renege if I get an offer from your firm, doesn't sound great, does it? Or would they not care? Nor does lying and saying I've declined it, or lying and making out I've negotiated an unrealistic and unbelievably long period to accept/decline the TC offer... Any tips appreciated, thanks!

In my upcoming vac scheme interview, if I am asked specifically what the outcome of my vac scheme with firm X was, I will obviously say the truth: I was offered a training contract.

However, if I am just asked generally how my vac scheme at firm X went, do you think I should volunteer that I have been offered a training contract? Benefit is it makes you look like a strong candidate; the negatives are potentially opening up questions around decision timelines, and that some firms don't allow (or don't like) people with training contracts to do vac schemes. Could disclosing my training contract actually harm my chances of getting the vac scheme?

Thanks!

@Jaysen @Abbie Whitlock
 
Please excuse the copy-and-paste (last year's vac scheme thread is now closed) but I have a follow-up question to this:



In my upcoming vac scheme interview, if I am asked specifically what the outcome of my vac scheme with firm X was, I will obviously say the truth: I was offered a training contract.

However, if I am just asked generally how my vac scheme at firm X went, do you think I should volunteer that I have been offered a training contract? Benefit is it makes you look like a strong candidate; the negatives are potentially opening up questions around decision timelines, and that some firms don't allow (or don't like) people with training contracts to do vac schemes. Could disclosing my training contract actually harm my chances of getting the vac scheme?

Thanks!

@Jaysen @Abbie Whitlock
It's a great question. Personally, I'd lean towards mentioning it. I think the benefits of showing how strong a candidate you are outweighs the risks of further questions.
 
Hi Jaysen and Abbie, I hope you are both well!! I am trying to figure out what firms are realistically in my reach and that I should be applying to in the next app cycle and was just wondering if I would actually be considered a strong candidate for MG/US firms (i have j finished second year and i am non-law)

academically i am slightly weaker, i got a strong set of gcses from 9-7, a levels i got AAB + A* in EPQ at a levels and i am at a top 10 university and have averaged 65 overall in both my first and second year.
in terms of exp i have worked at a regional firm, gone to 10+ insight days, done an insight week in IB and will also be working for 2 weeks at a law firm this summer and ofc involved in my uni law society and held part-time jobs and volunteering etc

i feel as though my academics hold me back slightly and wonder if it is still worth it to apply to us firms? any guidance/words of wisdom on this would be hugely appreciated.

thank you so much!!

@Abbie Whitlock @Jaysen
 
  • ✅
Reactions: Abbie Whitlock
Hi Jaysen and Abbie, I hope you are both well!! I am trying to figure out what firms are realistically in my reach and that I should be applying to in the next app cycle and was just wondering if I would actually be considered a strong candidate for MG/US firms (i have j finished second year and i am non-law)

academically i am slightly weaker, i got a strong set of gcses from 9-7, a levels i got AAB + A* in EPQ and i am at a top 10 university and have averaged 65 overall in both my first and second year.
in terms of exp i have worked at a regional firm, gone to 10+ insight days, done an insight week in IB and will also be working for 2 weeks at a law firm this summer and ofc involved in my uni law society and held part-time jobs and volunteering etc

i feel as though my academics hold me back slightly and wonder if it is still worth it to apply to us firms? any guidance/words of wisdom on this would be hugely appreciated.

thank you so much!!

@Abbie Whitlock @Jaysen
Yes you are a strong candidate for both!

The main thing US/MC firms look at are consistent 2:1s and, ideally, mid to high 2:1s and firsts. A 65 in your first and second year is great. GCSEs and A Levels don't matter much for most firms.

I'm generalising a little here e.g. there will be a few US firms that will care about this, but it's unclear who these are, and I wouldn't rule yourself out for this reason.

The main thing now is meeting firms, writing great applications, and passing the online tests!
 
Yes you are a strong candidate for both!

The main thing US/MC firms look at are consistent 2:1s and, ideally, mid to high 2:1s and firsts. A 65 in your first and second year is great. GCSEs and A Levels don't matter much for most firms.

I'm generalising a little here e.g. there will be a few US firms that will care about this, but it's unclear who these are, and I wouldn't rule yourself out for this reason.

The main thing now is meeting firms, writing great applications, and passing the online tests!
thank you so much for the quick response Jaysen this is super helpful!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jaysen
Hi @Abbie Whitlock @Jaysen, I have a competency interview coming up. I know that usually they want candidates to follow a STAR format, but I was wondering if this should be followed strictly or if it's important not to come across as pre-rehearsed or too rigid and show personality. Any advice would be greatly appreciated!!
Yes, I wouldn't follow STAR too strictly.

STAR works well at the beginning because it encourages candidates to elaborate on their answers. For example, where a candidate may have first answered a question about a time they worked in a team by jumping straight into an example, STAR forces them to explain the role, what they did, and how their actions led to an outcome. This is useful because you are more likely to answer the question in a way that shows what you did well, while making the context clear to the listener.

The downside of STAR, though, is that it can make your answers sound formulaic, especially where some examples don't fit into a box. For example, a few candidates in a row might start with 'A time I demonstrated teamwork was when I had X role in Y society. My task was to manage the finances...'. This can stop you from making interesting points that you would otherwise make.

I quite like CAR for this reason. I'm going to give some Context, Action and Result, but I have a little more flexibility as to how to get there.
 
Hi Jaysen and Abbie, I hope you are both well!! I am trying to figure out what firms are realistically in my reach and that I should be applying to in the next app cycle and was just wondering if I would actually be considered a strong candidate for MG/US firms (i have j finished second year and i am non-law)

academically i am slightly weaker, i got a strong set of gcses from 9-7, a levels i got AAB + A* in EPQ at a levels and i am at a top 10 university and have averaged 65 overall in both my first and second year.
in terms of exp i have worked at a regional firm, gone to 10+ insight days, done an insight week in IB and will also be working for 2 weeks at a law firm this summer and ofc involved in my uni law society and held part-time jobs and volunteering etc

i feel as though my academics hold me back slightly and wonder if it is still worth it to apply to us firms? any guidance/words of wisdom on this would be hugely appreciated.

thank you so much!!

@Abbie Whitlock @Jaysen
Hey!

I am doing well, thank you - I hope you are too!

I would say that your academics sound relatively strong! For context, I had similar GCSE and A-Level grades to you and attended a non-Russell Group university that I don't think would even be considered top 50 nationally. Despite that, I still received AC/interview invites from MC/US firms such as Clifford Chance and Paul Weiss.

You also have a significant amount of relevant experience already, particularly for someone who has just finished their second year (+ far more than I had at that stage!), which will definitely strengthen your applications.

I'd absolutely say it is worth applying to US firms if they genuinely interest you. While there are some firms that place a particularly strong emphasis on academics (as Jaysen mentioned), at the majority of firms your application answers, commercial awareness, work experience, and performance in online assessments and interviews will often have a much bigger impact on whether you progress.

At this stage, I really wouldn't rule yourself out based on your grades. Let the firms make that decision rather than doing it for them, as I think you'll be surprised! If you are interested in a firm and can put together a strong application, I think it is well worth applying.

Best of luck for the next cycle! :)
 
Hey!

I am doing well, thank you - I hope you are too!

I would say that your academics sound relatively strong! For context, I had similar GCSE and A-Level grades to you and attended a non-Russell Group university that I don't think would even be considered top 50 nationally. Despite that, I still received AC/interview invites from MC/US firms such as Clifford Chance and Paul Weiss.

You also have a significant amount of relevant experience already, particularly for someone who has just finished their second year (+ far more than I had at that stage!), which will definitely strengthen your applications.

I'd absolutely say it is worth applying to US firms if they genuinely interest you. While there are some firms that place a particularly strong emphasis on academics (as Jaysen mentioned), at the majority of firms your application answers, commercial awareness, work experience, and performance in online assessments and interviews will often have a much bigger impact on whether you progress.

At this stage, I really wouldn't rule yourself out based on your grades. Let the firms make that decision rather than doing it for them, as I think you'll be surprised! If you are interested in a firm and can put together a strong application, I think it is well worth applying.

Best of luck for the next cycle! :)
thank you very much Abbie!
 
  • Love
Reactions: Abbie Whitlock
When requesting an extension to a training contract decision window (I've been given 4 weeks), what's generally considered acceptable? In my case, I'd need an 8-week extension. Do you think that's ok, worth asking, or is it pushing it?

And is it acceptable to simply say you are waiting to hear back from a couple of firms?
 
Last edited:
  • ✅
Reactions: Abbie Whitlock
Hi again,

Another question.

I have an AC with Bevan Brittan and was informed yesterday that it'll involve a group excercise.

How can I prepare for this? I expect it'll test commercial awareness (not confirmed) but it's something I can say is my strong suit. I have until next week.
 
  • ✅
Reactions: Abbie Whitlock
Hi all, I have a vacation scheme next week that I am extremely excited and grateful for. However, I am pretty nervous as expected! I was wondering if anyone had any tips? And if there is anything that I can do to prepare?

It would be my first time in the corporate law environment, and obviously I want to come across as professional but of course natural too. Thank you all! And good luck for your schemes and applications :)
 
  • ✅
Reactions: Abbie Whitlock
When requesting an extension to a training contract decision window (I've been given 4 weeks), what's generally considered acceptable? In my case, I'd need an 8-week extension. Do you think that's ok, worth asking, or is it pushing it?

And is it acceptable to simply say you are waiting to hear back from a couple of firms?
Hey!

Congratulations on the TC offer!

I’d definitely ask! Being upfront about the fact that you are waiting on decisions from other firms is pretty normal in these TC processes and graduate recruitment teams are generally aware that candidates will be juggling multiple application processes at different firms.

An additional 8 weeks is on the longer side, so I wouldn’t necessarily assume it’ll be approved as I’m sure it differs from firm to firm. However, I don’t think it is an unreasonable thing to request if that is what you genuinely need - they may agree, they may offer a shorter extension, or they may stick to the original deadline.

Either way, I’d rather ask than make a decision before having all the information. There is usually very little downside to a polite request like this, and at least you will know either way :)
 
I've received my rejection from Lee & Thompson.

They do not provide feedback after in-person interviews, which makes it tricky to know how to adapt for next time. I was very happy with the way things went. It might be because other candidates had more typical legal experience (I've never been a paralegal, legal assistant, etc.), but that's only a guess.

With no VS, at least I get an extra week of revision for SQE 1 this summer. Every cloud...
 
I recently attended a law firm for a vacation scheme experience at a magic circle firm, and I have found it really interesting. I found the culture here is a bit more challenging and if I'm honest a bit jarring, it's completely at odds with other experiences I've had and my supervisor didn't seem to like me/gel/ seemed bored of me - which is fine.

I have other VS to look forward to but I'm just wondering, what advice do you have on navigating how to get a supervisor to like you!!! As they're the ones who are giving feedback to get the offer in the firms I'm going to !!
 
  • ✅
Reactions: Abbie Whitlock
Hi again,

Another question.

I have an AC with Bevan Brittan and was informed yesterday that it'll involve a group excercise.

How can I prepare for this? I expect it'll test commercial awareness (not confirmed) but it's something I can say is my strong suit. I have until next week.
Hey!

I have written a few posts on my general advice for group exercises before, which I will quote below - I hope they are useful in your preparation! Just shout if you have any further questions, and best of luck with the AC!! :)

Hi @LegallyBrunette_ !

Huge congratulations on being invited to AC - what a fantastic achievement!

In the AC that I completed for my TC, I had to complete both a group exercise and a case study interview, so I can understand wanting to do all you can to prepare in advance. I can share what worked best for me!

Group Exercise
  • In the group exercise, they are typically looking at how you work with others, not just what you contribute. Be collaborative, listen actively, and build on other people's points.
  • Aim to contribute regularly but avoid dominating - asking others for their views on a topic can show leadership without being overbearing. I would always aim to not be the loudest or the quietest in the room, although I know finding this balance can be quite tricky!
  • Keep the group focused on the task! I would always try and keep track of your progress and summarise the key decisions made as you go along.
  • If you have to select an idea, don't worry if yours isn't chosen. What matters is how you respond and whether you support the group's direction.

Case Study Interview
  • You'll usually be given a business / legal scenario with background documents. I would start by reading quickly to understand the big picture, and then go back to confirm the smaller details.
  • Structure your response clearly - identify the client's goals, outline the key issues, and suggest practical next steps.
  • They won't expect you to know black-letter law. Focus on logic, prioritisation, and showing that you can think commercially.
  • Talk the interviewer through your thought process - even if you get stuck or seem confused, they can see how you reason.
  • If given a contract to assess, make a note of the exceptions and calculations in the contract. You might be asked how your stance would change if X event occurred, and it's useful to be mindful of when it might fall under any exceptions.
I would also brush up on Jones Day's structure (e.g. their non-rotational training system and international work) just in case it comes up. They're assessing potential, not perfection - so as long as you stay calm and do your best, you'll be fine.

At the end of the day, they want to see the real you - someone who can think clearly, work well with others, and stay composed under pressure. If you go in with a collaborative mindset and a clear structure for approaching problems, you'll put yourself in a strong position.

Best of luck - you've already done the hard part by getting to this stage! :)

Hey!

Congratulations on receiving the AC invite!! I've collated some general advice from a few of my previous forum posts which will hopefully offer some guidance - just shout if you have any follow-up questions.

Motivational Interview

When preparing for the motivational interview, I'd encourage you to have a think about the following beforehand:
  • Be clear on why a US firm (e.g. lean teams, responsibility early on, client exposure, etc.)
  • Then narrow it down to why this US firm - practice strengths, the type of deals that they work on, the office culture, and any recent matters that interested you
  • Expect follow-up questions that test the depth of your knowledge on the firm / work (e.g. why corporation litigation vs disputes, why the London office, etc.)
  • Be prepared to back up your motivations with examples from your past experiences - for example, if you discuss wanting to have a lot of responsibility early on, you can strengthen your answer by discussing a past experience where you found that you enjoyed this aspect.
Overall, I'd try to create a narrative that links your interests to the firm and its work, as well as your long-term career goals.


Written Exercise
  • Practice timed writing - pick a 30-45 minute slot, read a short business or news article, and summarise the key points in a structured 1-2 page memo with a clear conclusion summarising your findings.
  • Work on prioritisation - pick an article with a lot of information, and practice picking out the 3-4 most important issues rather than trying to summarise and include everything.
  • Use a clear structure - this was the main thing that I implemented that helped me score higher on written assessments! Follow a clear structure in your answer, and practice what this would be for each type of document.
  • Check clarity - after writing (potentially one of the above), ask yourself if someone with no context to the facts could follow along with the information and your reasoning.
  • Proofread under pressure - I would get used to quickly checking grammar and flow, as this is really important in a written exercise! I sometimes struggled with this, as the pressure made me skip parts of my writing, but I found that literally following along with a pen or your finger can make sure you don't miss anything.
  • Review sample case studies - I would have a look online and see if there are any free resources that you can have a go at. A true lifesaver during my last cycle was this forum post by Jacob Miller, and I would definitely give it a read!

The main thing that assisted me in written exercises is following a clear structure! I would go through and read all of the materials first, and then go back to pick out the key details. You should be looking for key issues, areas that you will require more information, and anything that you think is important for the client to know.

I would then follow a clear structure in your answer. There are a few different types of documents that they could test you on - e.g. an email, memo, report, note, etc. I would have a look beforehand at the formatting of each, and have a go at writing them! If you are writing a letter / email to a client, make sure that you aren't including technical terms and writing in way that is easy for them to understand.

I would also try and find ways to showcase that you have the skills that they are looking for in trainees. For example, in one of my previous ACs I was asked to write an email to a supervisor. In this email, I outlined my arguments and recommendation, but I ended it by offering to draft the email / document for the client (e.g. proactivity). This will be dependant on each exercise, but if you can incorporate this in some way, I think it's a great way of standing out!

I've also previously created a post on client emails as a written exercise format - I have linked that here as well!


Group Exercise
  • In the group exercise, they are typically looking at how you work with others, not just what you contribute. Be collaborative, listen actively, and build on other people's points.
  • Aim to contribute regularly but avoid dominating - asking others for their views on a topic can show leadership without being overbearing. I would always aim to not be the loudest or the quietest in the room, although I know finding this balance can be quite tricky!
  • Keep the group focused on the task! I would always try and keep track of your progress and summarise the key decisions made as you go along.
  • If you have to select an idea, don't worry if yours isn't chosen. What matters is how you respond and whether you support the group's direction.

I hope that helps - wishing you the best of luck with the AC, and I'm sure you'll do great!! :)
 
  • Love
Reactions: Garak

About Us

The Corporate Law Academy (TCLA) was founded in 2018 because we wanted to improve the legal journey. We wanted more transparency and better training. We wanted to form a community of aspiring lawyers who care about becoming the best version of themselves.

Get Our 2026 Vacation Scheme Guide

Nail your vacation scheme applications this year with our latest guide, with sample answers to law firm questions.