Hi @FutureTraineeMaybe in my opinion, to do well for this type of question, it matters a lot more how you go about your research and analysis rather than the intrinsic value-add of the topic itself. That is why I would advise you to choose some of the topics where a line of analysis pertaining to impact to the firm's clients makes most intuitive sense to you and about which you think you would be genuinely interested to learn more about. This should naturally lead to you being (i) better informed about the topic, (ii) better able to present your thoughts about it clearly and persuasively; and (iiI) better able to answer follow-up questions and discuss the topic at length, should the partners decide they want to test you on that.Hi everyone!
When video interview/ app answers ask about recent developments that could affect clients, I want to make sure I’m focusing on the right kinds of news.
In your experience, what are the most relevant types of updates to draw on for these questions? For example, do you usually reference things like regulatory changes, shifts in interest rates, major geopolitical developments, new industry-specific regulations, or broader market/economic trends?
But more specifically: which current topics do you think are most value-adding to bring up in an interview?
I’d love to hear what you personally look out for or any go-to sources you use to stay prepared. Any insight would be much appreciated @Abbie Whitlock
@Andrei Radu
Thank you so much!
Same, still haven’t heard back. Probably means we passed the benchmark for the test and our apps are now being reviewed. Perhaps the earlier PFOs are from people who didn’t pass the benchmark. But honestly who knows lolHas anyone received Gibson PFO? I've seen few people progress to interview stage and offer, haven't been progressed but haven't received a PFO either, can they just put me out of my misery.
Thank you!!Hi @FutureTraineeMaybe in my opinion, to do well for this type of question, it matters a lot more how you go about your research and analysis rather than the intrinsic value-add of the topic itself. That is why I would advise you to choose some of the topics where a line of analysis pertaining to impact to the firm's clients makes most intuitive sense to you and about which you think you would be genuinely interested to learn more about. This should naturally lead to you being (i) better informed about the topic, (ii) better able to present your thoughts about it clearly and persuasively; and (iiI) better able to answer follow-up questions and discuss the topic at length, should the partners decide they want to test you on that.
As such, I do not think there is any category among the ones you listed that I would advise you to prioritise ahead of the others. What you should choose will depend on your own preferences, as discussed above, but also on the specific operations of the firm. Different firms will be impacted to a different extent by different developments - i.e. clients of a firm with a heavy tech focus will be significantly impacted by everything and anything going on related to AI, clients of firms with a heavy PE/capital markets focused will care a lot about changes in interest rates and broader economic sentiment, etc.
As for sources, some of the ones that were most useful for me are the following:
- FT News Briefing: as you will likely know, the best all around go-to short podcast to keep yourself updated to news
- BBC Business News and/or Bloomberg Europe: great for more in depth coverage of news, the BBC with more of a UK focus, while Bloomberg with a more financial markets-oriented focus
- Watson's Daily: great for in depth analysis of selected focus; teaches you how to go about commercial analysis
- The Global Legal Post, The Lawyer Podcast, Law, disrupted: great to learn how to connect broader commercial developments with law firms' as businesses + great to learn about how to compare firm's practices and operations
- The FT, The Guardian, BBC, Reuters, and just general Google searches: from time to time, I would use these to research a topic that I was particularly interested in.
Fingers crossed and hoping for the best.Same, still haven’t heard back. Probably means we passed the benchmark for the test and our apps are now being reviewed. Perhaps the earlier PFOs are from people who didn’t pass the benchmark. But honestly who knows lol
Hi @Ronaldo04 I would advise you to read my Competency Interviews Preparation Guide and follow the step-by-step preparation method I set out there; it is somewhat more comprehensive than you may need at this stage (as I wrote it primarily with final stage interviews in mind) so you no not necessarily need to practice answering that wide of a range of questions. Thus, I would focus on the getting really good at answering the most common types of interview questions such as the ones I will list bellow, as it is unlikely you will be asked something very different from that at this stage:Hey guys, I have a telephone interview with graduate recruitment coming up next week and I have never done one before. @Andrei Radu @Abbie Whitlock How should I go about preparing and what should I expect?
Thank you Abbie - you've been really helpful!Hey!
I think your plan sounds completely fine. The "number grade" box is just so they can see the numerical mark behind the classification, and firm's know that different universities use different marking systems.
If your uni marks out of 200, entering the raw mark (e.g. 140) is a sensible approach as you are also providing:
Normally, I would always just put the percentage in the number-grade box where possible, but if the form doesn't allow this, I think inputting the raw mark is the next best option (and completely fine!).
- The letter grade / classification, so they'll immediately understand the classification band, and
- Your transcript or CV which will explain the marking system, so they can then easily see that 140 corresponds to 70%
I hope that assists![]()
I got 4,4,6,9 dont think im progressing eitherI got 6,4,7,7 for the Weil SJT pillers. This is the worst I have ever received on an SJT. Has anyone received marks this low and progressed, or is it definitely a PFO with how terribly low I have scored?
WG on steroidsWhat is TW test?
Yea I'm curious about this as well, my amberjacks were 6/4/6/6Does anyone know the benchmark for the Amberjack with 4 pillars - I absolutely bombed it for the first time (I usually go well) and got 4,3,6,6. Does this mean that my VI wont even be looked at?
Yes and got mini heart attacks in the process too, thinking that it's a PFODid anyone get three emails from A&O about completing the online test and that their application is being reviewed and we will hear back after the deadline?
A critical thinking and verbal reasoning test.What is TW test?