• Hey Guest, Have an interview coming up? We’ve opened new mock interview slots this week. Book here
  • TCLA Premium: Now half price (£30/month). Applications, interviews, commercial awareness + 700+ examples.
    Join →

TCLA Vacation Scheme Applications Discussion Thread 2025-26

wait so ive gotten this email for very PFO amberjack email ive gotten- Unfortunately, at this stage in the recruitment process, we are unable to provide feedback. We wish you every success in your future career in law and thank you sincerely for your interest in XYZ

so does that mean i passed the benchmark for the VI and not the amberjack>
@Donuttime I'm not entirely sure and I hope I'm not confusing any of you, but where VI's or online assessments are used, typically the process for grad rec looks like this:

1. Application is checked for minimum criteria/mitigating circumstances
2. If the minimum criteria is met, the applicant is invited to the next stage which is the VI/online assessment OR it is an automatic invite upon application submission and stage 1 will be considered in stage 4
3. If you fail the test, you are notified that you weren't successful before the application is carried on to screening BUT if you pass the test, your application is progressed and they should notify you, but there isn't really a need to as they're screening you anyway
4. Application is now being manually reviewed - this is where your answers/cover letters etc are checked.

At stage 4, if you're not successful, then you'll be sent the generic PFO. So, I assume if you didn't get a specific email stating that you didn't meet the benchmark, then you probably did but you fell short in the actual application for whatever reason - however, I can't say for sure. This is just how I would assume it went.

This process may look different dependent on the firm, but the above is pretty much the standard.

Confused Thinking GIF
 
  • ℹ️
Reactions: Bottega_Veneta
Lowkey went into this cycle with this approach (applied to five and thought I would stop there because I researched them for months) and then got rejected by my two favourite firms at the start of November. I was like:

Shocked Cynthia Erivo GIF


Now I'm applicationmaxxing hahaha let's make it 25🤪🤪🤪

Me at an Open Day as a TC Elder saying “Yeah, like over the years I’ve heard quality over quantity. Like people get TCs with 4 applications.”

Little did I know… the cycle has had a revamp 😍😍

IMG_5789.jpeg
 
“Unfortunately, at this stage in the recruitment process, we are unable to provide feedback.”

But I thought all our VIs were manually reviewed, and if we didn’t meet the Amberjack, then isn’t that just a “You didn’t meet the benchmark”? LOL ANYWAYS

Confused Thinking GIF
Given how much time applicants AND grad rec put into this process, they should be able to tell candidates which criteria made the application unsatisfactory (“you failed amberjack” “grades too low” “poorly structured answer”). Unless it’s arbitrary, which I’m sure it usually is :D
 
Last edited by a moderator:
@spongebob for these sort of questions, they're usually checking two things:

1. If you've applied to firms that are similar to them
2. How dedicated you are to their firm in particular

The reason being, if you apply to firms that aren't necessarily this firms competitors, it could signal that your interest in their offering isn't particularly strong enough and you may leave upon qualification. Instead, they want to see that they are your top choice (as you said) so there is no risk of wasting investment here.

The way to approach is therefore, focus in on 2-3 firms that are very similar that you have applied for. Either similar is international reach, practice area strength, think back to your reasons for applying to this firm and try to get them to align with that (even if it is very minimal). They may want to know why it is you applied for them, so be sure to keep your interest in law consistent here. As for setting them as the top contender, I'd hope they don't ask directly (that feels a little gauche) but even if they do/don't - you should still naturally end with this, by honing in on what makes them better or why they interest you more. It helps to be as specific as possible here, so if talking about a case they worked on, or the types of clients the engage with helps then reference that. Their services/client base will differ slightly.
Thank you so much Afraz this is greatly useful and appreciated!
 
  • Love
Reactions: Afraz Akhtar
This has always hugely pissed me off. Given how much time applicants AND grad rec put into this process, they should be able to tell candidates which criteria made the application unsatisfactory (“you failed amberjack” “grades too low” “poorly structured answer”). Unless it’s arbitrary, which I’m sure it usually is :D
I spoke to a partner and senior associate at A&O and they said that a large part of getting through the application stage is luck.
 

About Us

The Corporate Law Academy (TCLA) was founded in 2018 because we wanted to improve the legal journey. We wanted more transparency and better training. We wanted to form a community of aspiring lawyers who care about becoming the best version of themselves.

Get Our 2026 Vacation Scheme Guide

Nail your vacation scheme applications this year with our latest guide, with sample answers to law firm questions.