Hi! Have you completed it? Was wondering what it is like?Just received the test link for Eversheds Sutherland, nervous!!
It’s a slightly more difficult but shorter version of WGHi! Have you completed it? Was wondering what it is like?
Hi Abby,Hello!
I would structure a strong 300-word answer to Ashurst's question by following a clear framework that shows: (1) you understand the firm, (2) you understand the sector, and (3) you can analyse future opportunities. A good structure could follow something along the lines of:
1. Opening (40-50 words)
Start by briefly stating the sector you've chosen (e.g. energy transition, digital economy, real estate, etc.). Show that you understand Ashurst's strategic focus and global position in the sector - this can involve discussing deals, published insights, or public statements from the firm.
2. Context of the sector (80-100 words)
Move on to explain what key facts or market trends are creating opportunities in that sector. For example:
You can support these points with news articles and current market insights, statistics, or trends - although there is no need to go into huge detail on the specifics!
- Regulatory reform
- Technological disruption
- The global push toward net zero
- Increased private capital deployment
- Geopolitical risk and supply chain restructuring
3. The biggest opportunity (100-120 words)
Identify one major opportunity and go into more detail on it - for example, digital assets regulation or demand for sustainable infrastructure funding.
Whichever opportunity you choose, explain why this is a priority, who the clients are, what problems they need solving, and how the opportunity is likely to evolve over time commercially and legally.
4. How Ashurst is positioned (40-60 words)
Finish your answer by linking the opportunity to Ashurst's specific strengths - for example:
To wrap up your answer, end with a confident line that shows how the firm can capitalise on this shift!
- Cross-border capabilities
- Strong regulatory advisory practice
- Financing and project development experience
I hope that helps, and best of luck with the application!![]()
you will find out tomorrow ! you get the results in a day I think, i did last year. my report was really bad and i sitll passed the benchmarkDoes anyone know what the HSFK test benchmark is? I got 2 moderate 2 weak and 1 good, and 1 technical expertise that said I was balanced and had both + and -. This was a ridiculous test
Hi! I have some thoughts / advice for your Qs, but please take it with a pinch of salt as I'm no expert lol.Hi guys,
I'm currently going through the Bird & Bird application form, and I had a few queries - if anyone has any tips, I'd be really grateful!
1. On the Work Experience section, candidates are asked:
"Please list any experience(s) where you feel you've developed your skills or knowledge, this could include paid or unpaid work, legal or non-legal internships, volunteering, societies/clubs, and attending events."
How detailed do you think candidates should be in this section - after all, it appears to cover not only work experience per se, but also a wide range of extra-curricular stuff (e.g. attending events). For instance, would it be relevant to talk about doing Bird & Bird's online Virtual Experience Programme? Moreover, do you think candidates would be expected to mention any work experience they've done (even, for instance, a short volunteering role at a local charity several years ago?). I'm quite anxious about failing to write down something which I ultimately should have written down; but at the same time, I'm aware that if I interpret Bird & Bird's definition of "work experience" too broadly, then I might end up writing down about so many events that it actually ends up having a detrimental effect on my application!
2. I took some time out of my degree due to unforeseen circumstances, and so although I took exams at the end of three academic years, it took me more than the usual three years to graduate from university. The problem is that the application form assumes that if, for instance, your degree lasted four years (i.e. there was four years between the start date and end date of your degree), then you received academic results for each of those four years - the form doesn't allow me to leave "Year 4" blank, and so I've had to resort to typing in "N/A" in the "module name" and "module grade" section. Does this sound okay?
3. The application form asks candidates to give their "Overall university average score/GPA". Is this literally just a case of adding up all of my module scores (as a percentage), then dividing them by the amount of modules I took? Or do I have to take weighting into account? To be honest, I'm not even entirely sure how my university grade are weighted - all I know are my marks for each module, the grade I received at the end of each year, and the final grade I was awarded!
4. The application form asks: "Why do you want to be a trainee solicitor at Bird & Bird?" - would it be valid to include some reasoning explaining why I am thinking of becoming a commercial solicitor (in other words, why I'd like to go into commercial law), or is best just to focus on "why Bird & Bird?"
cool, thats reassuring thanks! so u also got 2 weak ?you will find out tomorrow ! you get the results in a day I think, i did last year. my report was really bad and i sitll passed the benchmark
i got like all weak lolcool, thats reassuring thanks! so u also got 2 weak ?
When will the links for the Willkie event in an hour be sent out?
I received my link after I registered so it’s likely it is somewhere in your inbox. Might be worthwhile checking the junk folder incase it’s there.
A few commercial advantages of a sector-focused approach that come to mind are:@Abbie Whitlock @Andrei Radu Hi both, would you have advice on how to approach this question? Thanks!
What are the commercial advantages of Lewis Silkin's sector-focused approach, and how might it support the firm's growth in a competitive legal market (200 words).
Hi @pfoapplicant just to add to the great response from @wooliewoo I wanted say that based on the firm's prompt, you can definitely include a wide range of experiences that go beyond contract-based roles that would formally be classified as "work experiences". That said, as I see it, if you have attended many commercial law-related events, you should not make a separate entry for each of them and provide a detailed description. Instead, I would advise you to have one big "Careers events" entry, where you list the events you attended and also explain how these events/any particularly impactful event shaped your motivations. If you have completed multiple virtual experiences or short volunteering activities (or, really, any less substantial experiences that can be easily grouped together based on a set of common features), I would advise the same thing (although, of course, you can also draw connections to skills/abilities they've helped you develop).Hi guys,
I'm currently going through the Bird & Bird application form, and I had a few queries - if anyone has any tips, I'd be really grateful!
1. On the Work Experience section, candidates are asked:
"Please list any experience(s) where you feel you've developed your skills or knowledge, this could include paid or unpaid work, legal or non-legal internships, volunteering, societies/clubs, and attending events."
How detailed do you think candidates should be in this section - after all, it appears to cover not only work experience per se, but also a wide range of extra-curricular stuff (e.g. attending events). For instance, would it be relevant to talk about doing Bird & Bird's online Virtual Experience Programme? Moreover, do you think candidates would be expected to mention any work experience they've done (even, for instance, a short volunteering role at a local charity several years ago?). I'm quite anxious about failing to write down something which I ultimately should have written down; but at the same time, I'm aware that if I interpret Bird & Bird's definition of "work experience" too broadly, then I might end up writing down about so many events that it actually ends up having a detrimental effect on my application!
2. I took some time out of my degree due to unforeseen circumstances, and so although I took exams at the end of three academic years, it took me more than the usual three years to graduate from university. The problem is that the application form assumes that if, for instance, your degree lasted four years (i.e. there was four years between the start date and end date of your degree), then you received academic results for each of those four years - the form doesn't allow me to leave "Year 4" blank, and so I've had to resort to typing in "N/A" in the "module name" and "module grade" section. Does this sound okay?
3. The application form asks candidates to give their "Overall university average score/GPA". Is this literally just a case of adding up all of my module scores (as a percentage), then dividing them by the amount of modules I took? Or do I have to take weighting into account? To be honest, I'm not even entirely sure how my university grade are weighted - all I know are my marks for each module, the grade I received at the end of each year, and the final grade I was awarded!
4. The application form asks: "Why do you want to be a trainee solicitor at Bird & Bird?" - would it be valid to include some reasoning explaining why I am thinking of becoming a commercial solicitor (in other words, why I'd like to go into commercial law), or is best just to focus on "why Bird & Bird?"
Hello!Hi @Abbie Whitlock!
For RS, would talking about the SQE intern be discouraged in my reasons for why RS?
Hello!Are there any resources for practicing written exercises or case studies? thank you!