TCLA Vacation Scheme Applications Discussion Thread 2025-26

[applicant457]

you will find out tomorrow ! you get the results in a day I think, i did last year. my report was really bad and i sitll passed the benchmark

cool, thats reassuring thanks! so u also got 2 weak ?

 

[Dannie]

cool, thats reassuring thanks! so u also got 2 weak ?

i got like all weak lol

 

[Jaysen]

When will the links for the Willkie event in an hour be sent out?

I received my link after I registered so it’s likely it is somewhere in your inbox. Might be worthwhile checking the junk folder incase it’s there.​

I hope you found it useful!

 

[Andrei Radu]

@Abbie Whitlock @Andrei Radu Hi both, would you have advice on how to approach this question? Thanks!
What are the commercial advantages of Lewis Silkin's sector-focused approach, and how might it support the firm's growth in a competitive legal market (200 words).

A few commercial advantages of a sector-focused approach that come to mind are:

1. Ease of service: essentially, a sector-focused firm will deliver legal services in a way that is a lot easier for the client to use. Firstly, if a firm organizes teams more around sectors than practice areas, it looks and is a lot more similar to the client's business. Businesses perceive themselves as players in a certain industry and do not neatly separate their legal needs between the different workstreams of different practice areas. Thus, the legal service of sector-focused firms seems a lot more tailored to the client. Secondly, industry-focused firms tend to have partners with significantly broader expertise. Hence, the firm can provide a 'one-point-of-contact' system to clients, which is easier to navigate administratively.
2. Strategic advice: the idea is that if you spend years and years working on matters in a single industry, by the time you become a more senior practitioner you will have almost as much technical expertise in the sector as the client themselves. Having this kind of deep insight and knowledge of the industry will not only mean that you can give better advice to clients on particular mandates, but it will also mean you will be in a better position to form a client-lawyer relationship which goes beyond that. This way, you will have a good chance of getting to know all the insides of the client's business and becoming their go-to strategic advisor. Thus, the client gets the benefit of exceptional business and legal advisory services simultaneously.
3. Industry reputation: if the firm generally does a lot of high-end work in a particular sector, it will become very reputable with businesses in that sector. The fact that firm will simply be a very well-known name definitely helps in terms of shaping advantageous negotiations dynamics with opposing counsel. A great example of this is Kirkland in the PE sphere. Simply because of the firm's reputation in this area, it is able to obtain advantageous terms for clients by insisting they are "market terms". Because nobody does as many deals as they do in PE, it is sometimes difficult for the other side's counsel to counteract Kirkland's claims.

 

[badmintonflyinginsect]

Can someone let me know ASAP that for Links VS app - the professional qualifications section is NOT for GSCEs/A-levels?

 

[Andrei Radu]

Hi guys,

I'm currently going through the Bird & Bird application form, and I had a few queries - if anyone has any tips, I'd be really grateful!

1. On the Work Experience section, candidates are asked:

"Please list any experience(s) where you feel you've developed your skills or knowledge, this could include paid or unpaid work, legal or non-legal internships, volunteering, societies/clubs, and attending events."

How detailed do you think candidates should be in this section - after all, it appears to cover not only work experience per se, but also a wide range of extra-curricular stuff (e.g. attending events). For instance, would it be relevant to talk about doing Bird & Bird's online Virtual Experience Programme? Moreover, do you think candidates would be expected to mention any work experience they've done (even, for instance, a short volunteering role at a local charity several years ago?). I'm quite anxious about failing to write down something which I ultimately should have written down; but at the same time, I'm aware that if I interpret Bird & Bird's definition of "work experience" too broadly, then I might end up writing down about so many events that it actually ends up having a detrimental effect on my application!

2. I took some time out of my degree due to unforeseen circumstances, and so although I took exams at the end of three academic years, it took me more than the usual three years to graduate from university. The problem is that the application form assumes that if, for instance, your degree lasted four years (i.e. there was four years between the start date and end date of your degree), then you received academic results for each of those four years - the form doesn't allow me to leave "Year 4" blank, and so I've had to resort to typing in "N/A" in the "module name" and "module grade" section. Does this sound okay?

3. The application form asks candidates to give their "Overall university average score/GPA". Is this literally just a case of adding up all of my module scores (as a percentage), then dividing them by the amount of modules I took? Or do I have to take weighting into account? To be honest, I'm not even entirely sure how my university grade are weighted - all I know are my marks for each module, the grade I received at the end of each year, and the final grade I was awarded!

4. The application form asks: "Why do you want to be a trainee solicitor at Bird & Bird?" - would it be valid to include some reasoning explaining why I am thinking of becoming a commercial solicitor (in other words, why I'd like to go into commercial law), or is best just to focus on "why Bird & Bird?"

Hi @pfoapplicant just to add to the great response from @wooliewoo I wanted say that based on the firm's prompt, you can definitely include a wide range of experiences that go beyond contract-based roles that would formally be classified as "work experiences". That said, as I see it, if you have attended many commercial law-related events, you should not make a separate entry for each of them and provide a detailed description. Instead, I would advise you to have one big "Careers events" entry, where you list the events you attended and also explain how these events/any particularly impactful event shaped your motivations. If you have completed multiple virtual experiences or short volunteering activities (or, really, any less substantial experiences that can be easily grouped together based on a set of common features), I would advise the same thing (although, of course, you can also draw connections to skills/abilities they've helped you develop).

As for your more general worry on including too many or two few of your experiences: I think you want to find a right balance and not overwhelm recruiters with dozens of long entries, but, at the same time, you want to add as much value to your application as possible by including many experiences that formed relevant skills. Sometimes, it is true that "less is more" in that if you have way too many long entries, your most impressive and substantive experiences may make less of an impact on a recruiter than they could have had if they had not been drowned in a sea of other information. As such, I would advise you not to feel like you have to include everything and anything that could possibly go in. That said, generally, people err more often by being under-inclusive rather than over-inclusive, and recruiters constantly try to emphasise that a very wide range of experiences can be included in the work experience section.

As such, I would say that as long as you do not have more than 7-8 entries, you should not worry about this issue; while if you have 8+ lengthier ones, you should start considering the overall value add of each new entry vs the cost of adding more information for a recruiter to get through.

 

[Jessica Pearson]

@Andrei Radu @Abbie Whitlock and anyone else, please, how do I approach answering this question: Describe a recent commercial news story that interested you and explain how it relates to Trowers & Hamlins (max 250 words). Does it have to be a deal the firm has worked on/been involved in? Also, how do I go about structuring it to make it as tailored as possible? I appreciate any tips!