omg just got invited to stage 2!no you have to pass stage 1
omg just got invited to stage 2!no you have to pass stage 1
Not Andrei, but I was looking into the impact of changing capital requirements previously (re Basel 3.1 Regs) and the key thing is that it means banks can take on more risky assets i.e. they have more room to trade riskier debt, structured debt/assets etc which can lead to more LevFin, M&A etc as rightly pointed out. Generally speaking, it will boost transactional and financing activity and all the subsequent impacts from that. I can't speak to sector-specific stuff but I hope that helps.Hi @Andrei Radu Was hoping to hear your perspective.
Right now, I'm trying to write about the UK's recent relaxing of the capital rules for banks.
I'm struggling though to get deep into the analysis outside of the obvious increase in dealmaking. (I.e PE/ M&A transactions rely on a lot of leverage. Now that banks have more capital to invest with, these two areas will likely boom).
How can I then flesh this out/ have more commercial depth?
Is it fair to say that certain practice areas will benefit more/ less? Will drug research/ life sciences see additional increases in activity because of how capital intensive this area is?
Alternatively, is this perhaps not the best topic to use for a commercial issue application answer? I just wanted to hear your opinion, since I remember you saying how your answer was on a similarly broad commercial topic like how low interest rates affect deals.
Mine just updated to that straight after they emailed I passed to TI so I wouldn’t read too much into thatGuys I just saw this on my portal for DLA piper: ‘Thank you for working with us during our recruitment process. We are enjoying getting to know you’.
What does this mean? I wonder if this is a pfo in disguise
Woah, I haven’t got a TI invite email at all, does this mean I got a TI invite?Mine just updated to that straight after they emailed I passed to TI so I wouldn’t read too much into that
Hello!Has anyone got a Reed Smith AC recently? I’ve been waiting for a month now post test, wondering if I should just assume PFO 😭
Hi!Anybody know what I should expect with strength-based interviews for a law firm? Thanks!
Do you have any tips for the HSFK test? I've been told that it's kinda arbitraryThree - and I passed.
Good luck!
I was under the impression that most people would hear back within a month, so that's really reassuring to hear. Thanks so much for replyingHello!
I wouldn't assume a rejection based on the timeframe - I waited over a month in between completing my Reed Smith online assessment and receiving an assessment centre invite! There are various factors that go in to when invites are sent out, and the application window is still open - for the time being, I would take no news as good news![]()
I just got a mail saying hit the benchmark that's iti got an email as soon as i did it
nov first week aroundwhen did you complete your wg if you don’t mind me asking?
How do you see 'moderate fit' and high fit? I have just gotten a mail saying you hit the benchmark nothing elseJust finished the HSFK test, got moderate fit in all and high fit for one. Praying I've passed the benchmark lol!
Mine still says "thank you for completing your assessments"... oofGuys I just saw this on my portal for DLA piper: ‘Thank you for working with us during our recruitment process. We are enjoying getting to know you’.
What does this mean? I wonder if this is a pfo in disguise
They probably updated mine by mistake haha, I haven’t received a TI invite, I’m really pessimistic tbhMine still says "thank you for completing your assessments"... oof
Thank you Andrei, this has been really helpful. In terms of why this firm? I was talking about a deal which I really liked and cannot find another one in the firm news that mirrors that. Would you recommend changing that still or using the same one but maybe updating it slightly with new legislation or my experiences? Thank you so much for taking the time to answer my questionYou can and definitely should keep some things similar, particularly main themes and motivations. Since you have previously progressed, graduate recruiters will likely expect less in terms of how much you will have changed your answers. That said, I would highly encourage you to at least change some things, even if it is only a change in terms of how you structure an answer and how you formulate a given substantive point - you want to avoid similarity checkers showing your answers as nearly identical to last year, as this is generally not a good look ( some recruiters say they interpret this as you not having enough motivation to try to seek to improve).