I appreciate that, as it is the case with any other law firm. But, after 4 years of applications and one vac scheme I do feel like I have honed the first round question stage to the best of my abilities. It's just a shame that despite of what I feel was a genuinely strong application, strong wex, and an event attended by them, this wasn't enough alongside 17 in the arctic shores!
I thought my answer was so good when I wrote it but reading it again, I did not tailor the sector question properly so you are right in that.
There is space for mitigating circumstances - with the vantage system, it's always in the contextual information section, where you answer the soci-economic questions toward the bottom.Just submitted my Goodwin application - so many questions and I didnt see a section to put in any mitigating circumstances either which was annoying!
Also after all that proof reading I somehow managed to write my a level subjects wrong and wrote history twice instead of maths and historyIs it something I should contact them about because I know this makes me look silly and has probably ruined my chances
It's probably a no from any die-hard Liverpool supporters.
I progressed with Sidley, and have a mid 2:1 (with a few 2:2 modules) with no mitigating circumstances. I would say as long as you meet the requirements, they will look at your application holistically.
