• Get Everything You Need to Secure a Training Contract
    Now half the price. Join TCLA Premium for £30/month and get step-by-step application support, daily commercial awareness practice, and 700+ successful examples of past applications and interview experiences. Plus so much more.
    Join Premium →
  • Office Hours with BCLP (Live Q&A)
    17 December 2025 5:30 pm – 6:30 pm (UK) Hosted on TCLA TV
    Join Isabel Elsey, Legal Recruitment Manager at BCLP, for a live Q&A session. Get details on secondments, innovation, growth areas, and everything else you’ve wanted to ask about life at BCLP!

    📺 View Event →

TCLA Vacation Scheme Applications Discussion Thread 2025-26

fayfayk

Standard Member
Dec 17, 2025
7
5
When does grad rec usually work over december and january? I'm sure it varies by firm but if anyone has any idea.

Is it usually an, off from this friday until 5th jan type of situation, or working every day except 24th-26th and the 1st.
Hey! I don't have an exact answer for you because (as you said) it honestly differs between different firms and even between different people on the grad recruitment team! From my experience in the past, I heard back between December 1-20, and then it was a quiet period until around January 10. But, again, I want to emphasise that it really depends on the firm/person.
 

elle woods

Legendary Member
  • Dec 4, 2025
    336
    541
    I know that the question about the partners wasn't directed at me, but I thought I could also give my opinion from my experience as this was something I was really worried about during my VS too.

    From my experience, I was introduced to most partners in each of my seats at the start of each seat, at which point some of them offered to have a discussion about their work themselves. For the ones that weren't in the office at this point/did not directly offer a discussion, I researched more about their niche and either approached them in the office or sent them an email asking for 10 minutes of their time, normally at the start of the day when they are not fully immersed in their work.

    I also made the most of trainees in each seat and their advice on how partners prefer to be communicated with. Some partners don't like being approached at their desks and some expect you to be introducing yourself personally at their desk, so if there are any trainees in your seat I recommend asking for their advice on how to approach the situation. Also if there are any informal breakout areas like a canteen or coffee room, make the most of these. I managed to catch a partner while he was on his coffee break and ask to discuss a case he was working on as it was in an area I was interested in, and this negated the awkwardness of approaching him at his desk.

    I'd also completely agree with the idea of closed mouths never get fed- I definitely wish I had been scared of potential rejection and asked more partners/team members in general to run me through the work they do!
    Thank you also for sharing your experience! That's actually so interesting to think about, and the trainee thing is such a good idea! I'll keep this in mind for my scheme, thank you!
     
    • 🏆
    Reactions: scoffee

    fayfayk

    Standard Member
    Dec 17, 2025
    7
    5
    Hiii, thanks for sharing your experience! Do you have any advice as to how to convert a vac?? And maybe what not to do, or any insight as to why people might not convert one? I’m super nervous for mine and not sure what to expect and how to act lol 😭

    I’m a little scared that my written work/ tasks won’t be up to standard, or if I will know how to even approach the task in general (I guess the best approach is to clarify with the supervisor, but still)

    I’ve done a one-week vac at a smaller firm but I wasn’t too nervous for it since it wasn’t convertible anyways and it was quite informal.

    But since this vac is one with a much larger firm and one I really want, I’m just extra jittery! Any advice would be appreciated!!
    Hey there!
    As someone who has converted a vac scheme I hope I can provide some insights that could help you.

    First of all, one thing to be mindful of is emotional intelligence around the office. Broken down, that means being proactive around the office, but knowing when not to interrupt. You'd be surprised how many vac schemers fail to do this and go into people's offices when they have a meeting, are busy doing a task, etc. Also, remain positive throughout the scheme! I've found that it becomes a culture when vac schemers are sitting together to complain about certain people in the office or tasks, but, its important what you say remains positive and that you refrain from taking part in these conversations.

    As for written work, honestly, do not stress. The fact that you made it into a vac scheme after several rounds of interviews/assessments means you have what it takes to complete the tasks. I've found that doing practice case studies a few days before the vac scheme starts really does help in terms of refreshing my memory. However, you should always remember they are not expecting you to know everything to do with law! They are more so looking at your ability to write in a clear way, see how you articulate your thoughts and observe if you do so in a commercially attune way. Also, don't be scared to ask questions!!! If you feel like you might be approaching something wrong, speak to your supervisor and clarify before you keep going so you avoid a situation where your work is not what the task asked for.

    Good luck and hope it all goes well for you.
     
    • Like
    Reactions: elle woods

    floral.tcla

    Legendary Member
    Premium Member
    Aug 15, 2024
    151
    181
    If the firm has really said not to bring in past examples then you're probably right in that they are mainly assessing how you approach the situation. I'm sure that there will be differences in the points that each person makes and how they tackle the questions based on their own lived experiences. HOWEVER, if everyone does end up making similar points, the firm will likely distinguish candidates based on energy, confidence, and structure. So for example:

    Did you make your points clearly and logically?
    Did you stutter?
    Did you sound passionate and excited?
    Was your delivery & pronounciation strong?
    Were you maintaning eye contact? (or camera contact I guess??)

    These are definitely what I would make sure to have perfected before the VI!
    cheers!
     

    fayfayk

    Standard Member
    Dec 17, 2025
    7
    5
    How would you go about answering why transactional law and not investment banking?
    Hey! As someone who has a masters in financial law, I got this question so much while interviewing for TCs.

    For me, I found that explaining that I enjoy deals and strategy, but not in a purely numbers-driven role, really helped. I also explained that while investment banking and transactional law both involve working on complex, high-value deals, transactional law is grounded in legal analysis and judgment rather than marketing, trading, or financial modelling like investment banking.

    In short, I explained that my contribution would come from legal reasoning and problem-solving which I personally find more interesting and fulfilling.

    Hope this helps!
     
    • Like
    Reactions: Amgrad
    Hi all just had my DLA interview. Don’t want to give too much away but I think it’s fair to say not to worry too much, all of the questions were fair enough, nothing to stump you. Just be clear with your motivations and self awareness.
    hi, when did you apply and hear back for the TI? also is it for the ldn office. I haven’t heard anything for a while so assuming a PFO lol
     

    fayfayk

    Standard Member
    Dec 17, 2025
    7
    5
    What should we expect, look out for during written exercises on M&A? What are key issues to flag and more minor details? Any tips on answering these questions?
    Hey! For M&A written exercises I've found the following to work, I'll answer your questions in order:

    1. Usually written exercises come in the form of a short case study where you're acting like a junior on an M&A deal. Most of the time, you'll be asked to read some kind of bundle (usually includes emails, heads of terms, extracts from contracts) and flag issues. Here, they are usually testing whether you can spot risks and explain things in an easy and sensible way, rather than if you know every law in detail. Expect a mix of: commercial context (why this deal is happening), legal red flags AND time pressure (they usually want to see how you work under pressure so will give you large amount of info, don't let this stress you out).

    2. I'd say the key issues to flag usually include a mix of:
    - why the buyer is acquiring the business (is it growth, is it strategy, etc.)
    - what could come in the way of the deal (regulatory approval, competition issues, financing)
    - major risks that are found in due diligence (litigation, key contracts, risk of insolvency)
    - anything that can affect the completion
    more minor issues usually include smaller contractual gaps, issues that are easily fixable but still worth noting (like if certain consent is needed, etc.)

    3. tips on answering: I've found that no matter how good you are at answering the question itself, its your structure and clarity that will ensure you do well. I'd also say tie everything back to the facts given don't try to make up any info. If you're unsure about something in the case study, flag it as something you'd ask the client to investigate further. ALSO, brush on your commercial awareness and read the news beforehand, this really helps with bringing everything together.

    All in all, I'd say show your thinking logically and commercially. Good luck!
     
    • Like
    Reactions: Harvey Specter

    Jennifer2003

    Esteemed Member
    Sep 17, 2025
    78
    66
    One of Covington's questions is: What aspects of Covington’s work, culture or approach stood out to you in your research, and why do they appeal to you personally? How do you see these aligning with the kind of solicitor you hope to become? (300). I'm not sure what sort of things to look for, or even how to discuss, their approach. What typical things would define a firm's approach, or what sort of thing are you expected to recognise?
     

    elle woods

    Legendary Member
  • Dec 4, 2025
    336
    541
    Hey there!
    As someone who has converted a vac scheme I hope I can provide some insights that could help you.

    First of all, one thing to be mindful of is emotional intelligence around the office. Broken down, that means being proactive around the office, but knowing when not to interrupt. You'd be surprised how many vac schemers fail to do this and go into people's offices when they have a meeting, are busy doing a task, etc. Also, remain positive throughout the scheme! I've found that it becomes a culture when vac schemers are sitting together to complain about certain people in the office or tasks, but, its important what you say remains positive and that you refrain from taking part in these conversations.

    As for written work, honestly, do not stress. The fact that you made it into a vac scheme after several rounds of interviews/assessments means you have what it takes to complete the tasks. I've found that doing practice case studies a few days before the vac scheme starts really does help in terms of refreshing my memory. However, you should always remember they are not expecting you to know everything to do with law! They are more so looking at your ability to write in a clear way, see how you articulate your thoughts and observe if you do so in a commercially attune way. Also, don't be scared to ask questions!!! If you feel like you might be approaching something wrong, speak to your supervisor and clarify before you keep going so you avoid a situation where your work is not what the task asked for.

    Good luck and hope it all goes well for you.
    Thank you so much! This is also super helpful!
     
    • Like
    Reactions: fayfayk

    About Us

    The Corporate Law Academy (TCLA) was founded in 2018 because we wanted to improve the legal journey. We wanted more transparency and better training. We wanted to form a community of aspiring lawyers who care about becoming the best version of themselves.

    Get Our 2026 Vacation Scheme Guide

    Nail your vacation scheme applications this year with our latest guide, with sample answers to law firm questions.