Hi All,
Just a quick reminder: from 1 April, we'll be taking our application reviews out of TCLA Premium and pricing them separately.
This will not apply to those who have purchased a three-month subscription already. They will still receive application reviews for the months they have...
Very impressive, well done!
It would also be great to get your perspective on how you feel the application process is a skill (which I completely agree with).
Kicking this back off again: congratulations to @Helena for securing a month of TCLA Premium Version 2.0! You may not know it, but we've definitely noticed your consistent effort in contributing to the forum - thank you for supporting other members!
Hi All,
We've been posting advice on LinkedIn and a few other places about how to approach your first assessment centre. Thought I'd put it all together here.
Written exercise:
Partner Interview:
Group exercise:
The next one I'll be doing is on case studies, be sure to follow our...
Hi all,
I've received a few messages about this, so just to clarify a few things:
We're looking to move existing members over to the classes page (it's easier to manage memberships over there). New subscriptions can now be bought at https://classes.thecorporatelawacademy.com/ rather than via...
Personally, I'd say it's referring to special requirements/mitigating circumstances/particular issues that you want to raise about your application (anomalous grades etc.), so you can just put "N/A" if it doesn't apply. That said, I have seen students use it to briefly mention an aspect of the...
Hi All,
As some of you will have seen, we have now released TCLA Premium Version 2.0.
TCLA Premium V2 provides high-level training and resources to help aspiring lawyers secure training contracts at elite commercial law firms. It specifically targets commercial awareness and interview...
With our beloved @Salma starting her training contract at CC, we're now looking for two forum moderators to join our team.
When we started our forum, we had no idea that we'd grow such a friendly and helpful community. It has been so nice to see students helping each other out and watch members...
Yep, turning down schemes does happen. It's obviously not best practice, but you shouldn't find yourself in any trouble unless you want to do a training contract at that firm in the future.
If you do prefer JD, I'd go for it (I'd just factor in their current inflexibility as factor against them).
Any chance to interview for a direct TC?
They would not consider your application at all next year? That's not standard practice, but JD is a firm that's very particular when it comes to motivation for applying to them.
I wouldn't necessarily say best, but yes, separating through practice areas is a good way to distinguish the firms. You can add broader points after that, especially if the other firms are also good in litigation.
If you've met the firm before, that's also a good way to distinguish it from...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.