Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Law Firm Events
Law Firm Deadlines
TCLA TV
Members
Leaderboards
Premium Database
Premium Chat
Commercial Awareness
Future Trainee Advice
Forums
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
Applications Discussion
Allen & Overy app - 2018/19
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jessica Booker" data-source="post: 17743" data-attributes="member: 2672"><p>yes - they are making against the same criteria. </p><p></p><p>What your suggesting is very unlikely to happen. It’s not a case of liking an application (or not) - it’s about whether a standard is met. </p><p></p><p>Yes, there is some level of subjectivity in there (unfortunately there has to be when you are talking about people reviewing content about people) but generally application reviewing standards are purposely kept consistent and tight for various reasons.</p><p></p><p>About 90% of applications are pretty easy to make a decision on one way or another. If you are not doing the screening on your own (some smaller teams it is just one person doing it), with the 10% remaining, you often get someone else to check your thoughts. I’ve doubled marked thousands of applications through the years, either by training up new people or to double check people’s thinking, and typically it’s a very consistent process even before that check happens.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jessica Booker, post: 17743, member: 2672"] yes - they are making against the same criteria. What your suggesting is very unlikely to happen. It’s not a case of liking an application (or not) - it’s about whether a standard is met. Yes, there is some level of subjectivity in there (unfortunately there has to be when you are talking about people reviewing content about people) but generally application reviewing standards are purposely kept consistent and tight for various reasons. About 90% of applications are pretty easy to make a decision on one way or another. If you are not doing the screening on your own (some smaller teams it is just one person doing it), with the 10% remaining, you often get someone else to check your thoughts. I’ve doubled marked thousands of applications through the years, either by training up new people or to double check people’s thinking, and typically it’s a very consistent process even before that check happens. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Our company is called, "The Corporate ___ Academy". What is the missing word here?
Post reply
Forums
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
Applications Discussion
Allen & Overy app - 2018/19
Top
Bottom
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…