Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Law Firm Directory
Apply to Paul, Weiss
Forums
Law Firm Events
Law Firm Deadlines
TCLA TV
Members
Leaderboards
Premium Database
Premium Chat
Commercial Awareness
Future Trainee Advice
🚨 Reed Smith has just announced its Direct Training Contract route!
The deadline is
20th June
.
👉
Read Becca's announcement post here
📝
Apply directly here
Forums
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
Applications Discussion
Ask A Graduate Recruiter Anything!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="H48" data-source="post: 39471" data-attributes="member: 8093"><p>Hi Jessica, </p><p></p><p>I'm currently working on an application to Anderson Strathern, and I'm unsure how to tackle a few of the questions. They appear to have two different "why us/why you" questions, with one reading "<strong>Why have you chosen to apply to Anderson Strathern? (100 words)" </strong>and the other reading <strong>"<strong>What contribution do you think you would make to Anderson Strathern if appointed? In your response, please consider potential business generation, innovation and entrepreneurial input (200 words)." </strong></strong></p><p><strong><strong></strong></strong></p><p>What approach would you recommend taking to each question? I was thinking along the lines of not making the first question too personal, and 'saving' my personal skills/attributes/experience which make me a good fit for the firm for the second question. However, if I don't link the first question back to my own skills and attributes, could I risk 'deal dropping' and sounding as if I've just regurgitated the firm's website? </p><p></p><p>Thanks in advance for your help!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="H48, post: 39471, member: 8093"] Hi Jessica, I'm currently working on an application to Anderson Strathern, and I'm unsure how to tackle a few of the questions. They appear to have two different "why us/why you" questions, with one reading "[B]Why have you chosen to apply to Anderson Strathern? (100 words)" [/B]and the other reading [B]"[B]What contribution do you think you would make to Anderson Strathern if appointed? In your response, please consider potential business generation, innovation and entrepreneurial input (200 words)." [/B][/B] What approach would you recommend taking to each question? I was thinking along the lines of not making the first question too personal, and 'saving' my personal skills/attributes/experience which make me a good fit for the firm for the second question. However, if I don't link the first question back to my own skills and attributes, could I risk 'deal dropping' and sounding as if I've just regurgitated the firm's website? Thanks in advance for your help! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Our company is called, "The Corporate ___ Academy". What is the missing word here?
Post reply
Forums
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
Applications Discussion
Ask A Graduate Recruiter Anything!
Top
Bottom
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…