Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Law Firm Directory
Apply to Paul, Weiss
Forums
Law Firm Events
Law Firm Deadlines
TCLA TV
Members
Leaderboards
Premium Database
Premium Chat
Commercial Awareness
Future Trainee Advice
🚨 Reed Smith has just announced its Direct Training Contract route!
The deadline is
20th June
.
👉
Read Becca's announcement post here
📝
Apply directly here
Forums
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
Applications Discussion
Ask A Graduate Recruiter Anything!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Matt_96" data-source="post: 58032" data-attributes="member: 1260"><p>Hi Jessica,</p><p></p><p>I understand from looking at the Reed Smith thread that I will probably be sent the following research question to answer, which looks pretty challenging, and I have a few questions about how to approach it:</p><p></p><p><u><strong>'Taking into account the firm's core values and drawing on any examples you have from your experiences, would you feel confident enough to challenge your colleagues if they were carrying out a process incorrectly?'</strong></u></p><p></p><p>Firstly, do you think that the way this is phrased means that I should be doing multiple small examples rather than one big example? I don't know how long the word limit is yet, but in all of RS's other questions, it is 250 words. </p><p></p><p>Secondly, what is a good way of going about putting a firm's values into an answer? Should I spell each value out and how I demonstrated it explicitly? Or should I try and aim to do so more implicitly just with my examples?</p><p></p><p>Really curious to hear your thoughts on this.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Matt_96, post: 58032, member: 1260"] Hi Jessica, I understand from looking at the Reed Smith thread that I will probably be sent the following research question to answer, which looks pretty challenging, and I have a few questions about how to approach it: [U][B]'Taking into account the firm's core values and drawing on any examples you have from your experiences, would you feel confident enough to challenge your colleagues if they were carrying out a process incorrectly?'[/B][/U] Firstly, do you think that the way this is phrased means that I should be doing multiple small examples rather than one big example? I don't know how long the word limit is yet, but in all of RS's other questions, it is 250 words. Secondly, what is a good way of going about putting a firm's values into an answer? Should I spell each value out and how I demonstrated it explicitly? Or should I try and aim to do so more implicitly just with my examples? Really curious to hear your thoughts on this. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Our company is called, "The Corporate ___ Academy". What is the missing word here?
Post reply
Forums
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
Applications Discussion
Ask A Graduate Recruiter Anything!
Top
Bottom
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…