Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Law Firm Events
Law Firm Deadlines
TCLA TV
Members
Leaderboards
Premium Database
Premium Chat
Commercial Awareness
Future Trainee Advice
Forums
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
Applications Discussion
Baker McKenzie
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="LS12" data-source="post: 28813" data-attributes="member: 5714"><p>I think the point is the email is open for interpretation, how you’ve read it you may see no likelihood that those who haven’t heard will be invited to an AC. That being said, when they said we would hear by Monday, on Monday many people were saying they were refreshing their emails (myself included) and that was okay.</p><p></p><p>the difference is that some people have heard (congratulations to those people!!). But a member said that in the past they’ve offered ACs in batches. Whilst it may also be a bank holiday weekend, we really don’t know if the emails are automated or how the firm has decided to respond.</p><p></p><p>It may seem pragmatic to you to continue with the next application, but every person on this forum is in a different headspace. </p><p></p><p>I really just think, to keep this space as positive and constructive as intended, we shouldn’t be telling people they have been rejected unless they really have had the rejection email, no matter how likely it seems to you!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="LS12, post: 28813, member: 5714"] I think the point is the email is open for interpretation, how you’ve read it you may see no likelihood that those who haven’t heard will be invited to an AC. That being said, when they said we would hear by Monday, on Monday many people were saying they were refreshing their emails (myself included) and that was okay. the difference is that some people have heard (congratulations to those people!!). But a member said that in the past they’ve offered ACs in batches. Whilst it may also be a bank holiday weekend, we really don’t know if the emails are automated or how the firm has decided to respond. It may seem pragmatic to you to continue with the next application, but every person on this forum is in a different headspace. I really just think, to keep this space as positive and constructive as intended, we shouldn’t be telling people they have been rejected unless they really have had the rejection email, no matter how likely it seems to you! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Our company is called, "The Corporate ___ Academy". What is the missing word here?
Post reply
Forums
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
Applications Discussion
Baker McKenzie
Top
Bottom
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…