Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Home
Forum Home
Law Firm Directory
Apply to Paul, Weiss
Wiki
Law Firm Events
Law Firm Deadlines
TCLA TV
Members
Leaderboards
Premium Database
Premium Chat
Commercial Awareness
Future Trainee Advice
Reed Smith is live in the forum now
AMA
Live now
Graduate Recruitment and SQE interns from Reed Smith are here to answer your questions.
Join the live thread →
Willkie Live: How to Write a Successful Vacation Scheme Application
7 Oct 2025
5:30pm (UK)
Zoom (registration required)
Learn exactly how to write a successful application to Willkie Farr & Gallagher, with live examples + Q&A with
Gemma Baker
.
Register on Zoom →
Home
Forum Home
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
Applications Discussion
BCLP TC app question
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Alice G" data-source="post: 35666" data-attributes="member: 1160"><p>I agree with everything said above. With these questions at interview I’d say it’s good to take a moment to think through very carefully and come to a logical structure and a sort of step by step run down of what you would do, whilst always communicating your thought process. I had an SJT interview last year and my feedback (which was entirely fair) was that I hadn’t structured my answers well enough sometimes which meant they were not always really clear and well directed. Try to think through these scenarios like this:</p><p></p><p>step 1. In the first instance I would do X because XYZ</p><p></p><p>Step 2. Following this, or instead of this if X was the case then I would do XYZ</p><p></p><p>clarity and structure are arguably as important as the substance of what you say <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>I hope this helps <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Alice G, post: 35666, member: 1160"] I agree with everything said above. With these questions at interview I’d say it’s good to take a moment to think through very carefully and come to a logical structure and a sort of step by step run down of what you would do, whilst always communicating your thought process. I had an SJT interview last year and my feedback (which was entirely fair) was that I hadn’t structured my answers well enough sometimes which meant they were not always really clear and well directed. Try to think through these scenarios like this: step 1. In the first instance I would do X because XYZ Step 2. Following this, or instead of this if X was the case then I would do XYZ clarity and structure are arguably as important as the substance of what you say :) I hope this helps :) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Our company is called, "The Corporate ___ Academy". What is the missing word here?
Post reply
Home
Forum Home
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
Applications Discussion
BCLP TC app question
Top
Bottom
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…