[USER=2672]@Jessica Booker[/USER] Sorry for bringing this up again but it seems there's a lot of confusion about this BCLP question! For reference this is the question: What do you find attractive about Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner’s sectors/ departments and which area(s) are you interested in having exposure to in your Training Contract and why? (500 words)
For the first part of the question, regarding what we find attractive about BCLP's sectors / areas, I mentioned a lot of them, including M&A, finance, real estate, employment, and 1 or 2 others, and gave some small linking reasons as to why I'm interested in them. But the crux of my answer was that I'm interested in ALL of these areas, so I love the fact that BCLP has such a full-service approach, which is only complemented by their international presence.
I approached my answer to the 2nd part in a relatively broader way. I didn't refer to the specific group names which they might use on their website / Chambers Student, I just said I'm interested in real estate for XYZ reason, and litigation for ABC reason, and I'd love to engage with those two on the TC.
Do you think my approach to parts 1 and 2 of this question are good?
