Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Law Firm Events
Law Firm Deadlines
TCLA TV
Members
Leaderboards
Premium Database
Premium Chat
Commercial Awareness
Future Trainee Advice
Forums
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
Applications Discussion
Challenge facing the firm at this current moment - Directly criticise the firm or be more generic?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jaysen" data-source="post: 2878" data-attributes="member: 1"><p>The question isn't asking you to criticise the firm, although if you find yourself making a critical comment about the firm, that's fine. You can choose something general (like Brexit or AI), or you can be specific to a firm (e.g. Freshfields trying to break into the US market). It's completely up to you.</p><p></p><p>Being specific just means you understand how an issue would impact the firm. So for example, if you were writing about the role of AI, you wouldn't say: "AI impacts international law firms because..." That's too generic. Instead, you might say: "While Freshfields is already using the AI-based software Neota Logic, rival magic circle law firms are using XYZ..." </p><p></p><p>The ease of finding this information obviously depends on your topic. But see what you can find about the impact of your challenge on the legal market and then think about how it would impact the law firm, factoring in its market position/competitors/global reach etc., or anything else you know about the firm.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jaysen, post: 2878, member: 1"] The question isn't asking you to criticise the firm, although if you find yourself making a critical comment about the firm, that's fine. You can choose something general (like Brexit or AI), or you can be specific to a firm (e.g. Freshfields trying to break into the US market). It's completely up to you. Being specific just means you understand how an issue would impact the firm. So for example, if you were writing about the role of AI, you wouldn't say: "AI impacts international law firms because..." That's too generic. Instead, you might say: "While Freshfields is already using the AI-based software Neota Logic, rival magic circle law firms are using XYZ..." The ease of finding this information obviously depends on your topic. But see what you can find about the impact of your challenge on the legal market and then think about how it would impact the law firm, factoring in its market position/competitors/global reach etc., or anything else you know about the firm. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Our company is called, "The Corporate ___ Academy". What is the missing word here?
Post reply
Forums
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
Applications Discussion
Challenge facing the firm at this current moment - Directly criticise the firm or be more generic?
Top
Bottom
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…