Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Law Firm Directory
Apply to Paul, Weiss
Forums
Law Firm Events
Law Firm Deadlines
TCLA TV
Members
Leaderboards
Premium Database
Premium Chat
Commercial Awareness
Future Trainee Advice
Forums
Aspiring Lawyers - Interviews & Vacation Schemes
Commercial Awareness Discussion
Financial Crisis 2008
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jaysen" data-source="post: 1929" data-attributes="member: 1"><p>Here's Lehman's chief administrative officer arguing why Lehman should have been saved: <a href="https://www.ft.com/content/c86fbb48-af98-11e8-87e0-d84e0d934341" target="_blank">https://www.ft.com/content/c86fbb48-af98-11e8-87e0-d84e0d934341</a>.</p><p></p><p>A quick summary:</p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">The Fed wouldn't give them a loan despite Lehman having adequate collateral</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">They were prevented from becoming bank holding company (even though the Fed did it for Goldman and Morgan Stanley later), which would have saved the bank</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Bad decisions were made because of political pressure</li> </ul><p>He also points to how we could prepare for next time:</p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">The Basel Committee should assess whether the capital and liquidity requirements that were put in place after the crisis are appropriate</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Policymakers should review the rules put in place after the crash about rescuing banks.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">An "industry-financed fund", backed by the Fed, should be created to fund the rescuing of banks. Banks should contribute according to their level of systemic risk.</li> </ul><p>Or, if you want to argue the other point of view -- Why Lehman should not have been saved: <a href="https://www.ft.com/content/f96f2134-a15b-11de-a88d-00144feabdc0" target="_blank">https://www.ft.com/content/f96f2134-a15b-11de-a88d-00144feabdc0</a></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jaysen, post: 1929, member: 1"] Here's Lehman's chief administrative officer arguing why Lehman should have been saved: [URL]https://www.ft.com/content/c86fbb48-af98-11e8-87e0-d84e0d934341[/URL]. A quick summary: [LIST] [*]The Fed wouldn't give them a loan despite Lehman having adequate collateral [*]They were prevented from becoming bank holding company (even though the Fed did it for Goldman and Morgan Stanley later), which would have saved the bank [*]Bad decisions were made because of political pressure [/LIST] He also points to how we could prepare for next time: [LIST] [*]The Basel Committee should assess whether the capital and liquidity requirements that were put in place after the crisis are appropriate [*]Policymakers should review the rules put in place after the crash about rescuing banks. [*]An "industry-financed fund", backed by the Fed, should be created to fund the rescuing of banks. Banks should contribute according to their level of systemic risk. [/LIST] Or, if you want to argue the other point of view -- Why Lehman should not have been saved: [URL]https://www.ft.com/content/f96f2134-a15b-11de-a88d-00144feabdc0[/URL] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Our company is called, "The Corporate ___ Academy". What is the missing word here?
Post reply
Forums
Aspiring Lawyers - Interviews & Vacation Schemes
Commercial Awareness Discussion
Financial Crisis 2008
Top
Bottom
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…