Reply to thread

Hiya [USER=34537]@sarahfw[/USER]


Completely get why this might be playing on your mind (notwithstanding all the unfortunate LegalCheek coverage of the issue). However, I’ll have to echo what [USER=2672]@Jessica Booker[/USER] has already said: unfortunately, clawback clauses do exist, and there have been instances where firms have asked individuals to repay SQE-related fees. I know several people who failed parts of the SQE while studying with me. Some had their training contracts withdrawn, but weren’t asked to repay their fees. In those cases, the firms seemed to recognise that the individuals had taken their studies seriously and were genuinely trying, but just found the exam itself difficult.


As Jess said, my advice would be not to dwell too much on this now. Once you’ve secured a TC and know which provider you’ll be studying with, focus on putting together a structured, consistent study plan that works for you. And if it’s weighing on your mind a lot, it’s okay to ask questions about clawback clauses during the offer stage. Some firms are more flexible than others, and this might factor into your decision-making. But for now, I'd recommend just taking things one step at a time. Good luck and don't let the negative press coverage of this issue get you down :)


Our company is called, "The Corporate ___ Academy". What is the missing word here?

About Us

The Corporate Law Academy (TCLA) was founded in 2018 because we wanted to improve the legal journey. We wanted more transparency and better training. We wanted to form a community of aspiring lawyers who care about becoming the best version of themselves.

Newsletter

Discover the most relevant business news, access our law firm analysis, and receive our best advice for aspiring lawyers.