Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Law Firm Directory
Apply to Paul, Weiss
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Forums
Law Firm Events
Law Firm Deadlines
TCLA TV
Members
Leaderboards
Premium Database
Premium Chat
Commercial Awareness
Future Trainee Advice
Hi Guest,
I just wanted to give you a heads up that we are hiring
future trainees
. This is for a range of roles, including
remote
and
full time
.
If you're interested, apply
here
ASAP
!
Forums
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
General Discussion
Returning application for Withers vac scheme
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jacob Miller" data-source="post: 46320" data-attributes="member: 5063"><p>I would always recommend changing your application up- even if you're using similar examples etc, look at changing structure/ phrases/ word choice used to make the application read differently. Not changing the application runs the risk of a Grad Rec member reading the application and remembering it from a previous cycle, interpreting it as 'lazy' (even though that is not necessarily the case) etc. If I were you, I would actually bring into focus the things that you've learned and done <strong>since the last app cycle</strong> to show that you're a better candidate than you were a year ago. [USER=2672]@Jessica Booker[/USER] might be able to give more insight from a GR perspective, but, if I were in their shoes, I would only consider letting the application progress if the candidate showed to a good standard how they had worked to improve since the last time they interacted with the firm.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jacob Miller, post: 46320, member: 5063"] I would always recommend changing your application up- even if you're using similar examples etc, look at changing structure/ phrases/ word choice used to make the application read differently. Not changing the application runs the risk of a Grad Rec member reading the application and remembering it from a previous cycle, interpreting it as 'lazy' (even though that is not necessarily the case) etc. If I were you, I would actually bring into focus the things that you've learned and done [B]since the last app cycle[/B] to show that you're a better candidate than you were a year ago. [USER=2672]@Jessica Booker[/USER] might be able to give more insight from a GR perspective, but, if I were in their shoes, I would only consider letting the application progress if the candidate showed to a good standard how they had worked to improve since the last time they interacted with the firm. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Our company is called, "The Corporate ___ Academy". What is the missing word here?
Post reply
Forums
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
General Discussion
Returning application for Withers vac scheme
Top
Bottom
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…