Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Law Firm Events
Law Firm Deadlines
TCLA TV
Members
Leaderboards
Premium Database
Premium Chat
Commercial Awareness
Future Trainee Advice
Forums
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
Applications Discussion
TCLA Vacation Scheme Applications Discussion Thread 2023-24
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="trainee2025" data-source="post: 174909" data-attributes="member: 8482"><p>Although the overall LPC/SQE1 pass rate is potentially comparable, SQE1 has thrown up unprecedented numbers of failures amongst;</p><p>a. candidates from traditional course providers (BPP, Ulaw etc.). Proper engagement with the LPC through one of these ‘trusted’ providers was usually enough to ensure a pass, especially amongst extremely able TC holders. In the article you mention, the pass rate from some providers was 100%. The SQE1 averages are vastly lower than that wherever you look.</p><p>b. ‘sponsored’ candidates. Even those who hold TCs and are aware of the SQE1 workload are still failing the exam. That is what I think has been shocking and is materialising in far greater numbers than ever did for the LPC.</p><p>As I said before I think that with this in mind it’s very harsh that CC (and others?) are taking such a draconian approach.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="trainee2025, post: 174909, member: 8482"] Although the overall LPC/SQE1 pass rate is potentially comparable, SQE1 has thrown up unprecedented numbers of failures amongst; a. candidates from traditional course providers (BPP, Ulaw etc.). Proper engagement with the LPC through one of these ‘trusted’ providers was usually enough to ensure a pass, especially amongst extremely able TC holders. In the article you mention, the pass rate from some providers was 100%. The SQE1 averages are vastly lower than that wherever you look. b. ‘sponsored’ candidates. Even those who hold TCs and are aware of the SQE1 workload are still failing the exam. That is what I think has been shocking and is materialising in far greater numbers than ever did for the LPC. As I said before I think that with this in mind it’s very harsh that CC (and others?) are taking such a draconian approach. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Our company is called, "The Corporate ___ Academy". What is the missing word here?
Post reply
Forums
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
Applications Discussion
TCLA Vacation Scheme Applications Discussion Thread 2023-24
Top
Bottom
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…