are we all waiting for the second batch of rejections?Who is still waiting for an update from Hogan Lovells?
are we all waiting for the second batch of rejections?Who is still waiting for an update from Hogan Lovells?
A few people have had AC’s and SVS offers for HL and I saw one person for RPC. 🙂Any ACs or offers for HL / RPC (Summer VSs)? Still waiting for a response and PFOs are making me check my junk email every 5 mins 😫😂
HL: applied 31/10, WG done 09/12
RPC: applied 24/10, WG done 05/12
I am in the same boat, I emailed them today and still waiting for a response. Did you apply for a VS or direct TC?I applied to HL in October, not had a WG invite or PFO yet - should I assume PFO ?
We’d still ask that such detail aren’t shared as the types of assessments can still be used across cycles.Sorry Jess! I should've clarified that my experience was from the previous cycle!
No - it really won’t matter which one you choose.hey guys - when a firm is running two separate vacation scheme dates - ie a June and July scheme - would picking the later one affect my chances of securing the TC in anyway?
100% agree.Is anyone else starting to get resentful? I feel like I have made so many sacrifices for the TC cycle and so far there's been no good news. I know people always say 'if you want it badly enough just keep going', but how badly does one ever want employment? 😭 I want to work as a lawyer and I want a job. That's all. This is beginning to feel like a waste of my time. Like paralegals get exploited and paid so little and everyone keeps doing these roles until they land a TC...I feel like I would be progressing more if I was doing something else. Negative dump post, sorry guys.
please let me know if you hear of anything, im wondering this tooAnyone got any updates from RPC? They have been awfully quiet 👀
You don’t need to overthink/worry about this - just contacting them with the details you have outlined here is fine.hi all! i need some advice about staying in contact with partners.
i had a meeting with a partner from one of the firms i'm interested in several months ago. i got this opportunity through a mutual contact. we had a great chat, he was very friendly, and i learned a lot about the firm and decided to apply there. i got rejected post-app (was sad at first but it's okay).
i would like to send an email to the partner, updating him on the progress of my application. i also would like to express my interest in a paralegal position at the firm after my graduation, and ask who can i talk to regarding this to understand whether i'd be suitable for them.
i am not sure how to approach this as i have never had a partner contact before. i would like to maintain this connection as he was extremely friendly, and i feel like i can learn a lot from him in general.
any advice on how to approach it would be appreciated!
38th percentile does not mean that 62% of people get through the process.My post was not too offend - but to emphasise my opinion in a tongue in cheek manner regarding the pointless nature of them having a WG, if their ’pass rate’ is gonna be so low.
have you heard any updates on this?does anyone know how many batches of RPC AC have been sent out or done? its almost end of jan so im wondering if theres any more left
i emailed them.When/where did they say this?
have you heard any updates on this?I would love to know this too, getting hopeless.. I did the WG in early dec
It will vary between firms - I have seen everything from the 17th percentile to the 65th for the WG.Just curious, does anyone know what the typical percentile for passing the WG is? does it vary by each firm? I scored in the 60s for CC this year and still passed the benchmark, I'm curious if it varies significantly across firms
Was this for spring or summer?Has anyone else heard back from Milbank post-AC?
Ah this makes so much sense! Often times the assumption questions catch me out but when I run the answer key through different AIs to check the rationale, they all come up with different answers. Makes me feel better but also broadens the scope for subjectivity of how law firms grade these. Many thanks JessicaIt will vary between firms - I have seen everything from the 17th percentile to the 65th for the WG.
The issue is they although the Watson Glaser is a standard set of questions (WG is effectively a copyrighted brand), how the answers are assessed can be very different between firms, so you could do exactly the same test with the same answers and get the 20th percentile with one firm and the 60th in the other, and pass the one where you got the 20th percentile and fail the one where you got the 60th percentile.
Jessica can correct me if I'm wrong but I think what she meant is not that there are different answers for different firms, but that firms apply their own weighting to each section and each question is not worth the same to every firm. For example Linklaters might value the Assumptions questions 2x as much as the other sections whereas CC might weight the Deduction part the highest, so even if all 40 questions were the same you could put the same answers for both and do better in CC's test if you got more of the Deduction ones right, leading to different percentiles.Ah this makes so much sense! Often times the assumption questions catch me out but when I run the answer key through different AIs to check the rationale, they all come up with different answers. Makes me feel better but also broadens the scope for subjectivity of how law firms grade these. Many thanks Jessica![]()