Hi! I also applied for the spring vacation scheme at HSF, if I haven't heard anything from them is it safe to assume that it's a rejection? I know they've held a fair few AC's already.Im reminded of a quote: “A bird in the hand is better than 2 in the bush!” Accept the HSF offer and wait to see what happens with S&M. No point in trying to rush them to make a decision- it can come across as somewhat manipulative if you think about it. You can use your HSF offer as leverage once you accept if you’re a creative thinker.
I think they are still doing AC's im not sure? I had my invite 31st Dec but I wouldn't assume rejection as someone else on this forum got an invite 3 days before their HSF AC!Hi! I also applied for the spring vacation scheme at HSF, if I haven't heard anything from them is it safe to assume that it's a rejection? I know they've held a fair few AC's already.
Sent you a message!anyone got insights into HSF AC? please reach out, thank you!
I applied at 5am on deadline day and received the invite on FridayHii, congrats to everyone with CRS VI offers for the London office. Could people please clarify when they applied? I applied on the deadline day but feel like it will be a PFO![]()
Would you have any advice for case-study based and competency based AC’s? Congrats on HSF!!!!Sent you a message!
I'd say the latter is far more common than the former for most firms. If the firm you are interviewing with is known to be traditional/conservative, you may want to edge towards a full suit but these days a more "business casual" (albeit on the smarter side) is more common for professional meetings in law firms.Girls who have been to AC’s did you wear a full suit or just a formal blouse and pants? I’d feel more comfortable in a blouse and pants but would not want to be the only one taking this approach if it comes across as not formal enough!
Any help/insight into the Goodwin interview would be greatly appreciated!
Same for me! Probably will give them out MondayLol okay I was wrong no AC slot confirmation from Taylor Wessing it seems 😂
Is the amberjack test for Paul, Weiss not the 12 situation judgement questions, 5 Applied Verbal Reasoning questionsI was thinking of applying to SH but I didn’t know they used amberjack…
Paul, Weiss test has traumatised me. I’m trying to avoid this amberjack test at all costs now. 😂
Looks like I won’t be applying to SH at all. 🥲
Is the amberjack test for Paul, Weiss not the 12 situation judgement questions, 5 Applied Verbal Reasoning questions
5 Applied Numerical Reasoning questions?
Thank you so much, that is incredibly helpful!Hiya @SteinsGate
If the interview is still similar to previous years, it will likely be with two senior fee earners and cover a mix of commercial, motivational, and competency-based questions. When preparing, I think it’s worth thinking about the key sectors that Goodwin’s London office is particularly well known for (i.e. private equity, real estate, life sciences, tech, and finance). If you can, I'd encourage you to reflect on the intersections between these areas, such as prop tech and fintech, which are also where the firm has developed strong capabilities. In my interview, I was also pressed on Goodwin’s place in the broader London legal market, so it’s worth thinking about that as well.
There was also a short case study, though it didn’t require much legal knowledge. Still, it’s useful to have a basic grasp of the kind of contractual issues and commercial factors that can affect business transactions. The exercise itself was quite straightforward, but I initially overthought some of the questions, and it took me a few prompts to get to one of the answers. My advice would be to approach it methodically and not to second-guess yourself too much. It’s more about demonstrating a logical, commercial approach rather than coming up with a technically perfect response.
Overall, I'd recommend getting comfortable discussing Goodwin’s sector strengths, considering how they fit into the London legal market and speak to your motivations. As always, if you approach it with a clear structure and a focus on practical reasoning, you should be in a good position. Hope that helps, and best of luck with the interview!