Planning to apply for winter, spring or summer vacation schemes? Join our dedicated threads for support, deadlines, and discussion:
Let’s make this your strongest application season yet 💼
Hi guys,
Posting this on Breezy’s behalf as he is currently on a Spring VS, so isn’t active on this account at the moment. I am a close friend of his and he has trusted me to manage his account until he comes back from his VS.
Breezy has received a first-round interview invite from Paul Hastings for their Phirst Steps SVS. Does anyone have any advice or insight into this interview? For reference Breezy said he applied 1-2 days before the deadline.
What office?Hi, received a TI invite for Browne Jacobson. Any specific tips/advice greatly appreciated!
I think they’re all thereDid anyone else apply for HCR Law? I just got a first round interview but it mentions that the AC, If successful is in Cheltenham, not sure if this is a mistake on my part where I applied, or if theyre all there
Did you get the email about still sorting through the shortlist?Anybody heard from the BBC legal diversity thing?
They said today in the emails...
At like 9:30pm yeah😅Did you get the email about still sorting through the shortlist?
Guys, for written exercises, is it okay to write "executive summary" as the first subheading? Or does it seem too rehearsed?
Hi! I was just wondering what everybody’s personal thoughts and opinions are on this:
If you have got upcoming VSs, are you still applying to DTCs to hedge your bets or do you prefer to focus on preparing for and converting your VSs (and take some rest from applications as well)?
Me tooGateley Manchester VS offer!!
Hi @ashwright and huge congrats on getting to the interview stage 🥳 🥳 I am sure you will nail it! My best advice for you to avoid sounding robotic is to not memorize your answers during your preparation. Instead, I think you should simply aim to remember how to link key competencies/motivations with aspects of a wide set of your experiences, and then to practice as much as you can coming up with good answers on the spot. This way, you will develop the most important interviewing skill of all: an ability to express your thought in articulate manner even if you have not considered the issue in the past. I believe this is essential because (i) no matter how much you prepare, it is unlikely that every single question you will be asked will be one you have memorized an answer for; (ii) even if they are, it is unlikely the exact form and framing of every question fits the specific phrasing you have memorized; and (iii) even if you are extremely lucky in this regard as well and everything fits perfectly, given the nerves you will naturally be experiencing during the interview, it is likely you will inadvertently deviate from your pre-prepared 'optimal' answer, which might then make you overthink the issue and end up derailing your entire performance.
More generally, to keep calm on the day, I have two central pieces of advice: to focus on doing well, not on being perfect, and to aim to speak at a slower pace. I have explained these two tips in a lot more depth in a previous post, I will quote it bellow:
Gateley Manchester VS offer!!
Me tooMaybe see you there!
Amazing, thank you @Ram Sabaratnam !Hiya @allenpopi
I think it really does depend on the context of the written exercise. If the task is framed as a memo, especially to a partner or client, starting with an “Executive Summary” is not only acceptable but often expected. It shows you understand how to frontload key information in a reader friendly way. During a previous vacation scheme, I was actually called up for failing to include an executive summary in a memo which involved providing advice, particularly since there were many different considerations on the table.
That said, it’s important to match your tone and structure to the specific scenario. If the exercise feels more like a short note, internal email, or something more informal, a labelled executive summary might feel slightly overengineered/rehearesed. In those cases, it’s often better to just incorporate your summary into the first paragraph without a heading. I think a good rule of thumb is to take your cue from how the written task is framed. If it resembles a formal legal memo or briefing note, using "Executive Summary" as a subheading shows you understand professional communication norms. Just make sure it’s actually a summary and not an introduction (keep it brief, focused, and clearly reflective of the content that follows).
Hope that's helpful!
turns out the sourcecode is on github, lol, so saves me re-implementing itapparently this is not an original idea.
Found this on LinkedIn
In just 24 hours, we built an AI system that:![]()
We won 1st place for the Best AI Hack (that isn’t just an LLM wrapper)! | Siddharth Shringarpure
We won 1st place for the Best AI Hack (that isn’t just an LLM wrapper)! 🥇 In a world where every other LinkedIn post is about another GPT-powered assistant, my team and I built something different at birmingHack 1.0. Enter SocratEase — an AI-powered platform that helps you level up your...www.linkedin.com
💬 Analyses your speech fluency — because “uh” and “like” shouldn’t form half of your vocabulary.
🎭 Tracks eye contact & facial expressions — helping you engage, not just exist in conversations
🧩 Evaluates logical flow — helping you sound more like a TED Talk and less like a hallucinating LLM
![]()
Hi @ashwright I am so happy to hear about your experience - moments like this are why I love doing this job 🥲 thank you so much for the kind words and keep us updated on the response!Hi, Andrei! Thank you so, so, so much for your message!! I really appreciate your kindness - it honestly means a lot to me. I followed your advice to a tee and, for the first time in a long time, I feel like the interview went really well!! By linking the key competencies with my experiences, I was able to answer every single question they fired at me! Like you said, there were some questions that I could/did not anticipate in my preparation but thanks to your approach, I was able to answer such questions pretty well, pretty quickly.
The best 'side-effect' of taking your approach was that I was way less anxious since I wasn't worried about forgetting a word in my 'script'. As a result, I was able to crack jokes (where appropriate!) and engage in casual conversation. Whilst I'll hear a response in a couple weeks, I feel content in knowing that my interviewers genuinely seemed engaged with and interested in me. Overall, the interview was a far cry from the gruelling interrogation I was fearing.
Thank you, Andrei. You're genuinely a fantastic person & we are genuinely so lucky to have you here on TCLA. You single-handedly helped me feel less anxious about an interview than anyone else I have come across in my life. The legal profession is going to be all the more better with you being part of it. 🤝