• TCLA Premium: Now half price (£30/month). Applications, interviews, commercial awareness + 700+ examples.
    Join →

TCLA Vacation Scheme Applications Discussion Thread 2025-26

Abbie Whitlock

Administrator
Staff member
Gold Member
Premium Member
Sep 11, 2025
831
893
Hi - I have recently been invited to my first ever assessment centre (with Farrer & Co). I was hoping you might be able to offer some advice on how best to prepare. I believe there is a written exercise and then a group task. Thank you! @Abbie Whitlock
Hey!

Congratulations on receiving the assessment centre invite, that is fantastic news!!

Of course, happy to share my main thoughts after my experience with the Farrer & Co AC last cycle :)

Written Exercise

The main thing I would make sure to do is to have an understanding of the types of structures and document types that could come up. I would look up things such as attendance notes, memos, client emails, letters, and reports, and make a note of what elements you need to include and structure it in that way.

I also made use of headings and subheadings, and a mix of bullet points and prose, and I think that it made it easier to read and follow. Additionally, make sure you are clear on what practice area Farrers has - in my task, the hypothetical scenario included advising on certain areas of law and it was important to know whether Farrers actually advised on them.

Other than that, I honestly think just give it your best shot and you'll do well! During my first few ACs, I used to panic when under timed conditions, but I found that using a clear structure helped as it meant that I could tackle each bit at a time.

I have also written some more general written exercise posts that are largely based on my own experiences with them (including Farrers) - I have quoted them below.

Group Task

This type of exercise is usually much more about how you work with others rather than dominating the conversation. I would aim to contribute early, listen actively, bring quieter people in (if appropriate!), and help the group stay on track by keeping an eye on the time and making notes of agreed points. If you are debating views with another person or team, show that you have listed to the other side by addressing their argument directly and adapt your response from there, rather than defaulting to rehearsed points.

If there is a disagreement in the team, I would acknowledge the different views but ultimately try to move the group towards a decision. I also would try not to panic if you feel something goes slightly wrong - in my AC, I fell victim to being labelled the 'quiet person that needed to be brought into the conversation', but I still ended up with an offer! Additionally, aim to contribute where you can and facilitate the team working well together above saying as many points as you can - in my AC, 3 out of 4 of my group members ended up with a VS offer, so I think ensuring that you work well as a team and supporting each other through the exercise can really help!

I hope that provides some pointers - it can be hard to prepare in advance for both of these exercises, but having an idea of what to expect can be useful! Best of luck with the AC, I'm sure you'll do great! :)

Hello!

Congratulations on getting the invite! 🎉 Whilst I haven't completed the Ashurst written exercise, they will usually test your ability to communicate clearly and structure your arguments logically - similar to what you'd do as a trainee when drafting emails or internal notes.

I've outlined some previous tips that I always used when preparing for written exercises below:
  • Practice timed writing - pick a 30-45 minute slot, read a short business or news article, and summarise the key points in a structured 1-2 page memo with a clear conclusion summarising your findings.
  • Work on prioritisation - pick an article with a lot of information, and practice picking out the 3-4 most important issues rather than trying to summarise and include everything.
  • Use a clear structure - this was the main thing that I implemented that helped me score higher on written assessments! Follow a clear structure in your answer, and practice what this would be for each type of document.
  • Check clarity - after writing (potentially one of the above), ask yourself if someone with no context to the facts could follow along with the information and your reasoning.
  • Proofread under pressure - I would get used to quickly checking grammar and flow, as this is really important in a written exercise! I sometimes struggled with this, as the pressure made me skip parts of my writing, but I found that literally following along with a pen or your finger can make sure you don't miss anything.
  • Review sample case studies - I would have a look online and see if there are any free resources that you can have a go at. A true lifesaver during my last cycle was this forum post by Jacob Miller, and I would definitely give it a read!

The main thing that assisted me in written exercises is following a clear structure! I would go through and read all of the materials first, and then go back to pick out the key details. You should be looking for key issues, areas that you will require more information, and anything that you think is important for the client to know.

I would then follow a clear structure in your answer. There are a a few different types of documents that they could test you on - e.g. an email, memo, report, note, etc. I would have a look beforehand at the formatting of each, and have a go at writing them! If you are writing a letter / email to a client, make sure that you aren't including technical terms and writing in way that is easy for them to understand.

I would also try and find ways to showcase that you have the skills that they are looking for in trainees. For example, in one of my previous ACs I was asked to write an email to a supervisor. In this email, I outlined my arguments and recommendation, but I ended it by offering to draft the email / document for the client (e.g. proactivity). This will be dependant on each exercise, but if you can incorporate this in some way, I think it's a great way of standing out!

I hope that assists - best of luck with the written exercise, I'm sure you'll smash it! :)

Of course, no problem at all!!

Since client emails are such a common format in written exercises, it's definitely worth getting comfortable with how to approach them! A few things that I kept in mind when preparing:

Understand the Purpose and Audience

Before you start writing, clarify who you are writing to (e.g. a client, supervisor, or a colleague) and what information they need from you. The tone, level of formality, and structure will vary depending on whether it's an internal email or an email to an external client.

For example, if you are emailing a client, you want to ensure that they are able to understand any legal principles that you are outlining in your email. As such, it's important to make sure you write it in layman's terms and don't just recite the information given in the materials. However, if you are emailing a supervisor, I would focus on highlighting the most important pieces of information as you are effectively trying to save them time in going through the materials themselves. I would always aim to write in a professional way, and frame it like you would an actual email - such as a subject line and a closing sentence.

Use a Clear and Logical Structure

The main thing that I changed when approaching written exercises was making sure that I had a clear and logical structure. A good client email should be easy to follow. A simple structure could look like:

  1. Opening: A brief, polite greeting and context for why you're writing (and what you'll be discussing in the email). If you're emailing a supervisor, it might be useful to include a short summary of your findings at the top (i.e. an early conclusion), and then go into more detail below.
  2. Main Body: Summarise the key points or advice clearly and concisely, using short paragraphs. It might be appropriate to use headings and subtitles, especially if there is a lot of information. The goal is to make sure that the client can follow along, and that it isn't just a massive wall of text that is difficult to read.
  3. Closing: End with next steps, an offer of assistance, or a polite sign-off (e.g. "Please let me know if you'd like to discuss further"). These elements distinguish an email exercise from a general report or memo, and shows that you are following the brief exactly! If you are emailing a supervisor, I would try to show some proactivity in the closing parts - such as offering to write a first draft of a document or client email.

Keep your tone professional and approachable

I would aim for clear, confident language without being overly formal (but still professional). This can be tricky, but phrases such as "I'd recommend..." or "It may be helpful..." strike a nice balance. Avoid overly technical language or long-winded phrasing - simplicity often conveys professionalism! As stated above, I would definitely avoid legal jargon if you are writing to a client, unless you are certain that a client would understand it.

Also remember that tone can shift slightly depending on the client's relationship with the firm. If you are told this information, a longstanding client might suit a warmer tone, whilst a first-time contact may call for a more formal approach. However, if in doubt, I would always go for a more formal approach - especially in a professional context!

Be precise and client-focused

Remember the purpose for why you are actually writing to the client, and tailor your response to the client's actual issue. I would avoid copying large chunks of background information from the brief (as the client will already have this information!) - instead, demonstrate understanding of their issue by reframing the key points in your own words and applying them directly to the client's situation. Make sure to keep your advice practical - clients care more about what they should do next than about the legal theory behind it. You might find it useful to use signposting phrases such as "In summary..." or "Based on the information provided..." to make your reasoning easy to follow. If there are uncertainties, I would make sure to address them but be reassuring - e.g. "Further details would be needed to confirm this position, but at this stage...".

Check for clarity and tone at the end

Before your time runs out, take a moment to review your email. I always found it helpful to read it aloud (if possible) or follow along with my finger - this helps you catch sentences that are too long, unclear, or sound abrupt. Look for opportunities to simplify, and if a sentence takes more than one breath to read, it's probably too long! Make sure your sign-off fits the context (things such as "Kind regards" or "Best wishes" usually work best). The graduate recruitment team / assessors will be looking for professionalism in formatting and presentation - consistent spacing, clear paragraphing, and correct spelling and grammar will all make a strong impression.

As a practical tip to practice: You could start by taking short case studies and draft sample emails that summarise your advice in 200-300 words. This helps you get used to organising your thoughts quickly and writing in a professional, accessible way.

I hope that helps!
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: Jojo25 and Hugo2004

Novaa

Legendary Member
Dec 2, 2022
372
1,369
EU: 🤮
Public: 🥰
Contract: ☺️
Criminal: 😐
Tort: 😘
Land: 🙄
Trusts: 🥱🤔🤯
EU: 🫠
Public: 🫥😓 (made me cry)
Contract: 🥰
Criminal: 😘🥰
Tort: 🤕☺️ (great content but also made me cry)
Land: 😘🤨🥇
Trusts: 😘🤨🥇

Land and Trusts make me giggle, because I really didn’t understand what was going on, but that third-year pressure made me lock in 😭😭😭

Me opening my results:

Shocked Album Of The Year GIF by VaynerSpeakers
 

Abbie Whitlock

Administrator
Staff member
Gold Member
Premium Member
Sep 11, 2025
831
893
hey all!! @Abbie Whitlock @Abbie Whitlock

I have a written assessment coming up and I was wondering do i need to know any key legal terms?? I have just been practising written tasks in timed condition but im worrying about not knowing key terms.
Hey!

Congratulations on being invited to the written assessment!

This is a great question, and it is totally understandable to be worried! For most written assessments, you are not expected to know lots of technical legal terms - they are typically designed to test how you think and communicate, not what you already know legally.

That said, I would definitely make sure that you understand common commercial concepts such as warranties, indemnities and representations (although you won't be expected to know them in technical depth). An exercise might utilise these concepts, and it can be helpful to have an understanding of how they're used to allocate risk, and whether they are advantageous / disadvantageous to your hypothetical client.

However, for most written exercises, the assessors will be more interested in whether you can identify potential risks, think about their impact on the client, and explain your reasoning clearly. Therefore, I would try not to stress about learning lots of technical legal terms before the exercise :)

Best of luck!!
 

Donna Paulsen

Legendary Member
  • Sep 23, 2025
    312
    1,016
    EU: 🫠
    Public: 🫥😓 (made me cry)
    Contract: 🥰
    Criminal: 😘🥰
    Tort: 🤕☺️ (great content but also made me cry)
    Land: 😘🤨🥇
    Trusts: 😘🤨🥇

    Land and Trusts make me giggle, because I really didn’t understand what was going on, but that third-year pressure made me lock in 😭😭😭

    Me opening my results:

    Shocked Album Of The Year GIF by VaynerSpeakers
    What is this public hatred???? Me and @Lord Sumption will not stand for this x
     
    • Haha
    Reactions: Novaa

    Abbie Whitlock

    Administrator
    Staff member
    Gold Member
    Premium Member
    Sep 11, 2025
    831
    893
    Hiya! Does anyone have any experience of attending Irwin Mitchell’s AC and have any advice/what types of questions do they ask? Guidance says it’s a strength based interview
    Ty :)
    Hello!

    Congratulations on the AC invite, that is amazing news!!

    Whilst I haven't completed Irwin Mitchell's AC before, I have previously shared some advice on strengths-based interviews - I have quoted it below. Hopefully it is useful in your preparation! Wishing you the best of luck with the AC, I'm sure you'll smash it! :)

    Hi!

    Just to add to Andrei's advice, I thought I'd share my past experiences with strengths-based interview questions!

    For these types of of questions, the important element is to answer truthfully and be yourself. They are typically looking to see how you would handle specific problems, your general working style, and the traits that you naturally possess that would make you a good fit for the firm. In preparation for the interview, I would make a note of what your key strengths are, and how they align with the skills needed to be a trainee (and what the role involves).

    If you are given a hypothetical scenario, I'd talk the interviewer through each step that you would take to address the situation, and how you would use your personal strengths to aid you in handling anything that comes up.

    Additionally, I've also found that the questions can be reflective in nature and may ask you specific questions about your way of workings. For an interview I did on a vacation scheme, I was asked "What type of person are you under pressure?" (which definitely threw me off!). There isn't necessarily one right answer here, and I would take a moment to actually think your answer through and consider how you usually approach these situations. It might be helpful to reflect on your past experiences and weave these into your answer, so that the interviewer can see that you are rooting your answer in concrete examples.

    I hope that helps! :)

    Hey!

    It's totally normal to feel nervous, but I'd try to remember that they've progressed you this far for a reason! From my experience with strengths-based interviews, I would try to build rapport with the interviewers by being warm, engaged and genuine - try to treat it as a discussion rather than a formal assessment (whilst still remaining professional, of course!). Interviewers are human too, and sometimes asking genuine questions about their roles and career journeys can go a long way to show your interest in the firm.

    When answering strengths-based questions, I'd focus less on giving a "model answer" and more on explaining how you naturally think and work. They are likely trying to see what motivates you, what you enjoy doing, and how you respond in real situations. In a previous strengths-based interview I completed, I was asked questions such as "What kind of person are you under pressure?" - this definitely threw me off, but the important part is to just be honest! You don't need long STAR-style answers, as short and specific examples are usually more than enough to demonstrate your point.

    It can also help to link your answers back to the kind of environment BCLP offers (e.g. collaboration, adaptability, etc.), while still remaining genuine. The goal is to show that your strengths would translate well into how trainees at BCLP actually work day to day, and that you are motivated to work in the kind of environment that BCLP has.

    I hope that assists, and wishing you the best of luck with your interview - I'm sure you'll do great! :)
     
    • Love
    Reactions: Aug123

    Abbie Whitlock

    Administrator
    Staff member
    Gold Member
    Premium Member
    Sep 11, 2025
    831
    893
    Hi @Abbie Whitlock, hope you are well!

    Just wanted to ask how long my answer to why this firm should be in an interview. I timed myself and it's 5 mins, which is quite long. But I used the same lengthy answer in the initial interview (with grad recruitment) and they invited me back to the AC. Not sure whether this long answer would go down well with partners.

    Thank you so much!
    Hello!

    I am doing well (despite the endless rain in the UK...), thank you! I hope you are doing well too! :)

    Congratulations on being invited to the AC! I would say that 5 minutes is likely a bit on the long side for a "why this firm" answer. Even if it worked well with the graduate recruitment team, as you mentioned, partners tend to prefer clear and structured answers that get to the point more quickly.

    As a general rule of thumb, I would aim for around 2-3 minutes - you could start with a strong opening that signposts the rest of your answer, and then move onto 2-3 well-chosen reasons. You can always expand if they prompt you or ask follow-up questions!

    The fact that your longer answer worked before is a good sign, as it shows that the content is strong! The key now is refining it so that it is concise, rather than cutting entire ideas out.

    I hope that assists, and best of luck!! :)
     
    • ℹ️
    • Like
    Reactions: floral.tcla and londonlawyer

    About Us

    The Corporate Law Academy (TCLA) was founded in 2018 because we wanted to improve the legal journey. We wanted more transparency and better training. We wanted to form a community of aspiring lawyers who care about becoming the best version of themselves.

    Get Our 2026 Vacation Scheme Guide

    Nail your vacation scheme applications this year with our latest guide, with sample answers to law firm questions.