Gotta throw the Paul, Where Next? speculation somewhere in there too 🤣
Gotta throw the Paul, Where Next? speculation somewhere in there too 🤣
I would generally aim for two reasons at the expense of death of analysis, as recruiters will be well-aware that such a tight time limit will disable discussing anything but the headline point. That said, I think it can be fine to only present one point, provided that this is something of central importance to the firm and would by itself justify a strong interest in it. For instance, for Kirkland a single well-developed interest in PE point would likely do the job well here; but for Milbank, while the firm has good PE credentials, it probably wouldn't suffice.I would really appreciate anyone's thoughts on this. How many points would a firm expect you to include in why this firm question on a VI in a 60 second response? I've tried to include 2 points but after timing my response that's literally 3 sentences for each reason and they're not quite developed. Would it be okay to just mention one reason?
Do you mind sharing what your strengths and weakness was for the feedback report? i just got mine for the SVS and I'm curious to see if they are good enoughAshurst AC post-WE 🎉
Haven't hear anything yet, they are likely still going through spring apps. From what I can remember, they don't send PFOs until the beginning of Jan, with AC in the beginning/middle.has anyone heard back since passing the benchmark for HSFK Summer VS, be it PFO or AC?
A lot of ppl have said they have got pfo for spring, just wondering about summer
I got mine instantly, so should be pretty soonHow long after completing the Weil Amberjack assessment should I expect to receive the feedback report?
that’s a shout! Yes wake up to money is so good, I really like how they don’t assume prior background as a non-law/finance studentI saw someone posted on the forum recently about their commercial awareness resources and they’d referenced a podcast on Spotify called Wake Up To Money (BBC Radio 5 Live). I’ve been listening to it and ngl it’s lowkey good asf (better than trying to decipher the FT’s complicated jargon imo).
These sounds so focussed, thanks!I have a couple of ideas for this one. But here's the simple one: If you can pair FT's News Briefing with Unhedged and The Next Five, you'd do just fine. The first two should do the trick. They're usually a few-minute podcasts.
You need to game it.Just did the Mishcon SJT and got high verbal, high numerical and 6/7/7 for Applied Intellect, Creative Force and Digital mindset but only a 4 for Grit
Genuinely stumped by the "Grit" scores I'm getting - I'm yet to encounter a single question that I feel actually tests for grit and resilience. Perhaps I am misunderstanding the concept of grit in relation to these tests 🤪
Law Firms: "You can't study for the SJT, just be yourself!"
Me: *Answers SJT honestly*
Law Firms: "Eww"
Just an amberjack! no viDoes anyone know if the Mishcon SJT (stage 3) has a recorded video interview element?
I know that the AI Chat (stage 2) had a brief VI at the end, but it was not assessed.
i’ve gotten a VI extension from them before but it was bc i was in a&e lol so might depend on the reason? but i remember they also took maybe a day to reply - maybe follow up again? the extension was for a whole week though so quite useful!Guys how likely are W&C to give VI extensions? I really can't do my VI rn as I am travelling and emailed grad rec about it 2 days ago and no response. its due tomorrow
My scores vary massively in these tests depending on the questions so might just be that in this specific version of Amberjack you did better the other way around!I just completed the Mishcon de Reya test and got the impression that their scoring system was back to front.
I usually score highly for verbal reasoning but middling for maths (that is often my downfall with these tests).
But with Mishcon, I got top marks for maths and middling for verbal reasoning. The first time that has happened.
Anyone else notice that something was off?