Just remembered when I got asked “____ is there anything you want to add?” In my first group task at an AC.
Remember, there is a life outside work. These things are bound to impact personal relationships. Friendships, etc., will end up being paricitical and toxic. Often, people will not find peace in their later years in life (after their midlife crises). Maybe they'll never professionally or financially lose out. But it might impact them in more ways than you'd imagine.I really wish karma existed in corporate. Too often, it feels like the people who advance the furthest are the ones most willing to step on others. Big Law especially is not known for morality and ethics.
commercial disputes, mid-market m&a, pe - it’s for jones day - i was looking into these areas mainlyIt depends on the firm. What are their practice areas?
100% agree. I received feedback from an unsuccessful AC where they straight out told me 'It does not matter that you were covering for another member of your team who got confused..you still were slightly more dominant in the conversation because of it. Maybe try and focus on how you come across rather than trying to help your team mate for the exercise'.I really wish karma existed in corporate. Too often, it feels like the people who advance the furthest are the ones most willing to step on others. Big Law especially is not known for morality and ethics.
Exactly!! It's a cliche but at the end of the day you've got to be able to look at yourself in the mirrorApart from sabotage or actively immoral behaviour*
Sorry, I know it's not relevant and goes without saying, but bad behaviour long term will come round to bite you (well, that's my copium at least).
Recruitment is not a moral or fair process. You have to do what’s in your best interests always because everyone else is out for themselves.
hey! not sure if someone already asked this but how was it?? are they situational based or motivations? i feel like they have barely given any info1min prep from question (+ 5sec countdown), 2minutes answer.
I think the lack of info is by design, it's so applicants can think on their feet. However, my advice is to go over old posts for the same firm - as usually the format follows similarly. Most are situational/strengths based, with I think one motivation basedhey! not sure if someone already asked this but how was it?? are they situational based or motivations? i feel like they have barely given any info
Hey @floral.tcla ooh you always manage to come through with the questions that have me second guessing myself, but I'll try.hey @Afraz Akhtar and everyone else!
What advice would you have for developing verbal and written communication skills, particularly persuasion, especially the ability to remain articulate when under pressure like during an AC?
Hi Afraz, oh lol - I'll take it as a good sign 😆Hey @floral.tcla ooh you always manage to come through with the questions that have me second guessing myself, but I'll try.
With skills centred around verbal/written communication, I think confidence is key. So first of all, have confidence in your opinion whether you need to articulate it through speaking or writing and get straight to the point. Often or not, we tend to waffle and all this does is distract away from the point we are making, and take the reader/listener on a journey they don't need to be on, where they're most likely to get side-tracked and miss what you're actually trying to say. So, display confidence. Whenever you speak/write, answer the question directly, back-up your answer with examples if you're stating something that could be open to speculation.
Once you've become comfortable with your speech/words, you'll find that persuasion becomes a little more simpler. However, confidence is not the only thing that's needed here. You need to be able to think about what the contradicting opinion may be, and tackle that in advance. For example, in a typical AC negotiation you're tasked with persuading the Seller to up the purchase price, but before you make your proposal, think about what they may say in retaliation. Deconstruct your own arguments before you make them, and make your case accordingly, to pave way for any potential objections thus allowing you a chance to tackle it head on and stumble the opponent. This comes with practice, but once you've pinned it down, it'll be a great help,
As for articulation, I don't really know what to say. It's going to sound ridiculous, but I often talk a little slower in professional settings as it allows me to say the words clearly and at one consistent pace. To others it may not seem like anything is going on, but this also gives me the chance to think about what I am going to say as I am saying it. I found this really helps, but just like persuasion, it took time.
Although these are good skills to have, its not critical to be perfect, so don't put too much pressure on yourself at this stage. Nobody is expecting perfection, and you'll find there are still some Partners looming around who stumble when they speak. It is normal, just take your time, control your pace, and think about what it is you want to say.
I hope this helps![]()
Hey, when did you receive the test? I submitted my application today but haven’t received any.Hi does anyone know if RPC's online assessment has a VI element. They state that they test your motivations so I don't see how they do that apart from a VI unless they mean the traditional SJT motivations like testing whether you like tackling unfamiliar tasks.
hey theres no VI element!Hi does anyone know if RPC's online assessment has a VI element. They state that they test your motivations so I don't see how they do that apart from a VI unless they mean the traditional SJT motivations like testing whether you like tackling unfamiliar tasks.
your profile pic is making me hungry... I love kinder buenos yumhey theres no VI element!
your profile pic is making me hungry... I love kinder buenos yum